A crazy thoughts about structure of an Electron.

[socratus]

A crazy thoughts about structure of an Electron.
=.
Electron isn’t a point.
Electron has a geometrical form.
Electron’s geometrical form isn’t static, isn’t firm.
Electron’s geometrical form can be changed by his own inner spin.
Electron’s own inner spin can be described with three ( 3 ) formulas:
Plank: h=Et,
Einstein: h=kb,
Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck: h*=h/2pi.
The speed of photon is minimal : c=1.
The speed of electron is c>1
Quantum of light, photon and electron are one and the same
particle in different conditions.
=.
Question:
Where did electron come from?
Answer:
Electron came from the Kingdom of Coldness: T=0K.
=.
All the best.
Israel Socratus
===.

[socratus]

Electron’s fine structure constant.
=.
It is interesting to understand the Sommerfeld formula:
a= e^2 / h*c, where {a} is fine structure constant: 1/137
Feynman expressed (a ) quantity as
‘ by the god given damnation to all physicists ‘.
But the fine structure constant is not independent quantity,
it is only part of formula of an electron: e^2=h*ca .
The constant {a} is only one of three constants which
belong to the formula of electron: e^2=h*ca.
(a), (c), (h*) are three constants which created the electron.
And if we don’t know (a) then we don’t know what electron is.
Therefore in the internet is possible to find 100 different models
of electron. For example.
The book "What is the Electron?"
Volodimir Simulik
Montreal, Canada. 2005. /
In this book:
‘ More than ten different models of the electron are presented here. (!!!)
More than twenty models are discussed briefly. (!!!)
Thus, the book gives a complete picture of contemporary theoretical
thinking (traditional and new) about the physics of the electron.’

ftp://210.45.114.81/physics/%CA%E9%B...Simulik%20.pdf

All of these models are problematical.
We can read hundreds books about philosophy of physics.
But how can we trust them if we don’t know what electron is.
And somebody wrote:
If I well remember Einstein once said about particle physics:
"why do we study some many particles?
Understand really what is an electron would be enough."
. . .
‘ Finding the structure of the electron will be the key
to finding the origin of the natural laws.’
=.
By my peasant logic at first it is better to understand
the closest and simplest particle photon /electron and
then to study the far away spaces and another particles.
=.
Best withes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus

==.

[socratus]

P.S.
What is the electron configuration ?
Is the electron a photon with toroidal topology?

http://www.cybsoc.org/electron.pdf
#
A New Limit on Photon Mass.
Physics News Update

===.

[theFireRises]

I agree 100%. What is an electron?

[socratus]

I agree 100%. What is an electron?

The simple quantum particle electron has six ( 6 ) formulas:
+E=Mc^2 and -E=Mc^2 , E=h*f , e^2=ah*c,
E=-me^4/2h*^2= -13,6eV and E= ∞.
If we would try to bind them together ( kipping in the mind
* The Law of conservation and transformation of energy/ mass*)
then, maybe, we could understand what the simple electron is.
==.

[socratus]

" The most incomprehensible thing about the world is that it is comprehensible."
/ Albert Einstein /
==.
We have a geniuses technology ( as a comprehensible conception) )
and a comic philosophy ( as an incomprehensible thing) .
===..

[socratus]

Why the simple quantum particle electron has six ( 6 ) formulas:
+E=Mc^2 and -E=Mc^2 , E=h*f , e^2=ah*c,
E=-me^4/2h*^2= -13,6eV and E= ∞ ?
Because an antielectron, quantum of light- photon and electron are
one and the same particle in different conditions.
==.

[socratus]

Quote by Heinrich Hertz on Maxwell's equations:
"One cannot escape the feeling that these mathematical formulae
have an independent existence and an intelligence of their own,
that they are wiser than we are, wiser even than their discoverers,
that we get more out of them than was originally put into them."
==.
Mathematical formulas and physical laws explain more
than modern physicists try and cannot understand.