What do I have that is worth anything?
I think this is a question people should ask. If you want any personal power or freedom you need to have some resources. As Mr. Wemmick in Great Expectations might say, everyone should have some portable property. (That is a good book, by the way. I recently read it for the first time.)
You should have portable assets, including tools of your trade, if you have valuable skills. With these portable items of value you can, perhaps, survive in difficult times.
I bring this up to answer a question from several days ago. The question has to do with government assets and government financial assets in particular.
As long as people attribute value to paper currency and there is "enough" paper currency to transact business, they will transact business and the government will be able to pay its enforcers and the enforcers will enforce the decrees of the government figureheads.
Look at what has happened in Zimbabwe in the recent weeks or days. The common citizen has been stripped of cash (the ATMs are empty) but the soldiers and police are paid in US dollars, aka "hard" currency. Never mind the fact that the only real hard currency is gold and silver.
Note the evil behavior on the part of the powers that run the Zimbabwe state government. They are corrupt and can't hide their unethical behavior.
OK. Here is what I am getting at. The electronic dollars and the contracts and agreements at the government and CB level are pretty much irrelevant when ethics breaks down at those higher levels. It does not really matter what the Consolidated Statements of Assets of the various States and Agencies say or don't say. The decision makers will do whatever they think is necessary to protect their position or reputation and the accountants and auditors will make whatever bookkeeping entries are called for to cover their tracks. The bankers will move money around, create loans, etc. so things look "reasonable" on the surface. People, by and large, will accept anything as long as they have something to eat and something to entertain them.
Analysts and commentators will make both reasonable and outlandish statements and a few people will adjust their behavior to protect what they can. The majority of people will "suddenly" wake up and find they are not prepared.
So, do what you can to prepare.
I expect the situation to evolve into some sort of police state. Perhaps some public entities will set aside real assets beside guns and ammo. They have land and buildings, but can they act independent of the higher levels of gov? The Federal, State and County levels with their agencies and police are pretty much locked together in one vast interlocking bureaucratic monolith.
Here and there, there may be a few ethical politicians, but they are rare. Where is the critical mass that can effectively move the needle?
I think this is a question people should ask. If you want any personal power or freedom you need to have some resources. As Mr. Wemmick in Great Expectations might say, everyone should have some portable property. (That is a good book, by the way. I recently read it for the first time.)
You should have portable assets, including tools of your trade, if you have valuable skills. With these portable items of value you can, perhaps, survive in difficult times.
I bring this up to answer a question from several days ago. The question has to do with government assets and government financial assets in particular.
As long as people attribute value to paper currency and there is "enough" paper currency to transact business, they will transact business and the government will be able to pay its enforcers and the enforcers will enforce the decrees of the government figureheads.
Look at what has happened in Zimbabwe in the recent weeks or days. The common citizen has been stripped of cash (the ATMs are empty) but the soldiers and police are paid in US dollars, aka "hard" currency. Never mind the fact that the only real hard currency is gold and silver.
Note the evil behavior on the part of the powers that run the Zimbabwe state government. They are corrupt and can't hide their unethical behavior.
OK. Here is what I am getting at. The electronic dollars and the contracts and agreements at the government and CB level are pretty much irrelevant when ethics breaks down at those higher levels. It does not really matter what the Consolidated Statements of Assets of the various States and Agencies say or don't say. The decision makers will do whatever they think is necessary to protect their position or reputation and the accountants and auditors will make whatever bookkeeping entries are called for to cover their tracks. The bankers will move money around, create loans, etc. so things look "reasonable" on the surface. People, by and large, will accept anything as long as they have something to eat and something to entertain them.
Analysts and commentators will make both reasonable and outlandish statements and a few people will adjust their behavior to protect what they can. The majority of people will "suddenly" wake up and find they are not prepared.
So, do what you can to prepare.
I expect the situation to evolve into some sort of police state. Perhaps some public entities will set aside real assets beside guns and ammo. They have land and buildings, but can they act independent of the higher levels of gov? The Federal, State and County levels with their agencies and police are pretty much locked together in one vast interlocking bureaucratic monolith.
Here and there, there may be a few ethical politicians, but they are rare. Where is the critical mass that can effectively move the needle?
Comment