The timing of the meltup
It was assumed that Killary would win and nobody covered their tracks. "As soon as Hillary lost the election, all the foreign governments, including Saudi Arabia, withdrew their “donation” for a smoke-screen charity."
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/i...bi-about-time/
It was assumed that Merkel would win so, the pension crisis was held off until after the election. It is not working out that way. Germany, like England is coming apart.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/w...crisis-begins/
Grantham wrote about the coming Meltup. His graphs were showing about a 3 1/2 year peak area. John Hussman has good replies showing that 3 1/2 years may be a bit too long. https://twitter.com/hussmanjp/status...825984/photo/1
https://www.themaven.net/mishtalk/ec...YEyaYMtegR-LkQ
What happens is; Everybody is afraid of missing out (FOMO) This keeps reluctant money-renters from leaving the markets. At some point, the rise is just too steep and, fear overcomes greed. The CBs are hard at work trying to inspire greed. IF the CBs have truly dialed back stimulus, one would expect fear to make a pretty fast appearance.
Don't look now, but Morgan Stanley wealth just took their high yield allocation to zero. They have exited the junk-bond market. How many others will take this as a cue to get out?
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4135751-wants-junk
Just how much of the market can the CB buy?
"The average pension fund assumes it can achieve a 7.6% rate of return on its assets in the future."
"The trouble is that for stocks to return anywhere near 8% they would need to fall more than 50% first. "
"Currently, the index trades at roughly 2,690 thus it would take a major stock market crash for investors to have the opportunity to invest at a level that would enable them to achieve anything close to what pensions now require."
The stupidity here is frightening. If the stock market crashes 50%, consumption will crash with that. These knuckleheads expect dividends to stay static if consumption crashes.
https://thefelderreport.com/2018/01/...-same-fashion/
"Shares are expensive – keep buying them. That appears to be investors’ consensus view. “Looking into 2018, we believe that the concerns about a bubble for US equities are overdone,” he says. “Compared to past crises [2000, 2007], we don’t see excess in terms of flows." Open your effing eyes.
"Prices have climbed so high that the average yield on stocks in the S&P 500, the broadest US index, has slipped below 2%. "
"One flashing light was the extreme difference between the performance of US “value” stocks – the type of reliable profit and dividend-earners he tends to prefer – and “growth” companies. The disparity was “greater than at any stage in stock market history”, Woodford said – yes, even including the 1929 Wall Street crash.
Woodford, who manages £15bn, famously sat out the dotcom bubble of the late 1990s and cleaned up afterwards."
"Grantham is the British-born veteran fund manager who in 1977 co-founded Boston-based GMO, which today manages $75bn (£55bn) of assets. The firm’s fame partly derives from its skill in having identified, and dodged, the last two big market blow-ups – the dotcom bubble of 1998-2000 and the US housing crisis that preceded the financial crash of 2007-09."
"He defines a bubble as being “excellent fundamentals euphorically extrapolated”.
https://www.theguardian.com/business...jeremy-bentham
1/08 11 Saudi princes sent to supermaxes for protesting utility bills – Bloomberg MbS wants to show everybody that he is ruthless. Sooner or later, the other royals are all going to chip in a few Rouble and hire a good Russian hitman.
1/07 China unveils world’s first solar-powered highway – Green Matters
Thieves shut China's solar highway after just five days | South China ...
1/08 Ron Paul: Sessions should be fired over marijuana move – CNN A LOT of Americans are going to need to be stoned to cope with the coming collapse.
It was assumed that Killary would win and nobody covered their tracks. "As soon as Hillary lost the election, all the foreign governments, including Saudi Arabia, withdrew their “donation” for a smoke-screen charity."
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/i...bi-about-time/
It was assumed that Merkel would win so, the pension crisis was held off until after the election. It is not working out that way. Germany, like England is coming apart.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/w...crisis-begins/
Grantham wrote about the coming Meltup. His graphs were showing about a 3 1/2 year peak area. John Hussman has good replies showing that 3 1/2 years may be a bit too long. https://twitter.com/hussmanjp/status...825984/photo/1
https://www.themaven.net/mishtalk/ec...YEyaYMtegR-LkQ
What happens is; Everybody is afraid of missing out (FOMO) This keeps reluctant money-renters from leaving the markets. At some point, the rise is just too steep and, fear overcomes greed. The CBs are hard at work trying to inspire greed. IF the CBs have truly dialed back stimulus, one would expect fear to make a pretty fast appearance.
Don't look now, but Morgan Stanley wealth just took their high yield allocation to zero. They have exited the junk-bond market. How many others will take this as a cue to get out?
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4135751-wants-junk
Just how much of the market can the CB buy?
"The average pension fund assumes it can achieve a 7.6% rate of return on its assets in the future."
"The trouble is that for stocks to return anywhere near 8% they would need to fall more than 50% first. "
"Currently, the index trades at roughly 2,690 thus it would take a major stock market crash for investors to have the opportunity to invest at a level that would enable them to achieve anything close to what pensions now require."
The stupidity here is frightening. If the stock market crashes 50%, consumption will crash with that. These knuckleheads expect dividends to stay static if consumption crashes.
https://thefelderreport.com/2018/01/...-same-fashion/
"Shares are expensive – keep buying them. That appears to be investors’ consensus view. “Looking into 2018, we believe that the concerns about a bubble for US equities are overdone,” he says. “Compared to past crises [2000, 2007], we don’t see excess in terms of flows." Open your effing eyes.
"Prices have climbed so high that the average yield on stocks in the S&P 500, the broadest US index, has slipped below 2%. "
"One flashing light was the extreme difference between the performance of US “value” stocks – the type of reliable profit and dividend-earners he tends to prefer – and “growth” companies. The disparity was “greater than at any stage in stock market history”, Woodford said – yes, even including the 1929 Wall Street crash.
Woodford, who manages £15bn, famously sat out the dotcom bubble of the late 1990s and cleaned up afterwards."
"Grantham is the British-born veteran fund manager who in 1977 co-founded Boston-based GMO, which today manages $75bn (£55bn) of assets. The firm’s fame partly derives from its skill in having identified, and dodged, the last two big market blow-ups – the dotcom bubble of 1998-2000 and the US housing crisis that preceded the financial crash of 2007-09."
"He defines a bubble as being “excellent fundamentals euphorically extrapolated”.
https://www.theguardian.com/business...jeremy-bentham
1/08 11 Saudi princes sent to supermaxes for protesting utility bills – Bloomberg MbS wants to show everybody that he is ruthless. Sooner or later, the other royals are all going to chip in a few Rouble and hire a good Russian hitman.
1/07 China unveils world’s first solar-powered highway – Green Matters
Thieves shut China's solar highway after just five days | South China ...
1/08 Ron Paul: Sessions should be fired over marijuana move – CNN A LOT of Americans are going to need to be stoned to cope with the coming collapse.
Comment