Productivity vs distribution
Keynes was childless when he left this world but, he left behind his great BASTARD. Recent developments in Japan have shown the true colors and results of his great failure. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-1...man-apologizes
At the same time, Herr Weidmann has clearly shown that the Keynesian failures in Europe are a huge contrast to the rational management in Germany. Kudos To Herr Weidmann For Uttering Three Truths In One Speech | David Stockman's Contra Corner
A purely capitalist economy would have a relatively large demarcation in the difference of living standards between the producers and the non-producers.
A collectivist economy attempts to make this demarcation much smaller. The non-producers would have a higher standard of living under collectivism than under free-market capitalism.
This theory sounds good to the non-producers. BUT, being non-producers, they have no understanding of motivation. They were never afflicted with this malady. Socialism appears rational to those who would most benefit from it. Those who work the hardest feel no temptation to give away the fruits of their labor. The socialists say, " from each, as to his abilities, to each, as to his needs". Socialism promises no rewards so, it is nothing more than a distribution system, NOT a producing plan.
The world is flooded with needy bureaucrats and lawyers that all "merit" a huge salary. They don't produce anything but, they wear nice suits. They ferociously fight against any reduction in their standard of living. They ferociously deny that they are superfluous. They increase the taxes and decrease the motivation. With 100 million + Americans of working age no longer in the work force, the tax base shrinks. It will crash. It always does.
Keynes was childless when he left this world but, he left behind his great BASTARD. Recent developments in Japan have shown the true colors and results of his great failure. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-1...man-apologizes
At the same time, Herr Weidmann has clearly shown that the Keynesian failures in Europe are a huge contrast to the rational management in Germany. Kudos To Herr Weidmann For Uttering Three Truths In One Speech | David Stockman's Contra Corner
A purely capitalist economy would have a relatively large demarcation in the difference of living standards between the producers and the non-producers.
A collectivist economy attempts to make this demarcation much smaller. The non-producers would have a higher standard of living under collectivism than under free-market capitalism.
This theory sounds good to the non-producers. BUT, being non-producers, they have no understanding of motivation. They were never afflicted with this malady. Socialism appears rational to those who would most benefit from it. Those who work the hardest feel no temptation to give away the fruits of their labor. The socialists say, " from each, as to his abilities, to each, as to his needs". Socialism promises no rewards so, it is nothing more than a distribution system, NOT a producing plan.
The world is flooded with needy bureaucrats and lawyers that all "merit" a huge salary. They don't produce anything but, they wear nice suits. They ferociously fight against any reduction in their standard of living. They ferociously deny that they are superfluous. They increase the taxes and decrease the motivation. With 100 million + Americans of working age no longer in the work force, the tax base shrinks. It will crash. It always does.
Comment