The circulation and creation of high-power money
Bank loans are called "low power money". They are created out of nothing and carry an interest burden. If you borrow $ 100,000, you must repay $ 300,000. The additional $ 200,000 is not created with the original principle and must be taken from low-power funds created for later loans. It is obvious that credit must continuously expand to provide the funds to service previous loans. There can be no interruption in expansive credit creation.
When the West crashed into a low-wage competitor, employment crashed. If remunerative employment has crashed, how can credit creation continue to expand? That $ 200,000 must come from somewhere to service all the endangered debt.
The brother of low-power money is high-power money.
"For the United States, the components of high-powered money are
gold coin or certificates and other money fully backed by gold; paper
money or deposit balances not secured by gold reserves but constituting
a liability of the Treasury or (since 1915) of Federal Reserve Banks"
http://www.nber.org/chapters/c1642.pdf
In a general sense, high-power money ( base money ) is gold or GOV notes that do not carry an interest burden.
In 2008, when credit crashed, enormous amounts of debt were in danger of default. There was not enough low-power money circulating to supply the demand. The system lacked low-power money so, the difference had to be made up with high-powered money.
TARP was created so that FED money could be created to rescue endangered debt. In reality, the employment crash was hugely deflationary. TARP money could not reflate the economy if it was debt money subject to repayment on interest and principle. Senator Inhofe reported that the TARP money was not repaid. That solved the problem of how to inject high-power money into the economy when low-power money was insufficient.
Possibly, Sen Inhofe angered somebody because a plane fell out of the sky that was carrying his son.
Low-power money is highly deflationary because of the interest drain. In the good times, new credit creation supplies the funds that pay the ever-increasing interest burden. The Treasury supplies high-power money to top off the system when there are temporary hiccups in the supply of low-power money. The Western crash into a low-wage competitor is not a temporary retraction in employment. It is not a temporary retraction in the demand for new credit. The FED has only one set of tools in it's bag of tricks.
It can lower interest rates and / or inject high-power money.
In the final analysis, the lower loop of the economy must depend on employment and value-added industry to supply it's needs. Without these 2 assets, it can not escape the high deflation of the interest drain that accompanies low-power money. The upper loop of the economy can count on the injection of high-power money to sustain itself.
Previously, high-power money was created gold-backed. In today's world, high-power money is created ex nihilo much the same as low-powered money. This blurring of distinction is responsible for the blurring of inflation / deflation.
A return to gold backing for ( purportedly ) high-power money would severely reduce the ability of the PTB to create free money for themselves.
Without the limitation of gold backing, there is no limitation of "money" creation. The limitation on the creation of low-power money is the creditworthiness of the would-be receiver.
GOV and banks are non-producers and most certainly do not want their access to funds to be restrained by their creditworthiness.
This is true of all non-producers; beggars, bankers and bureaucrats. NONE of them want to be limited by their creditworthiness. They are NOT ABLE to blow a bubble in low-power money so, they blow a bubble in high-power money. The crash in the producing economy is mostly a crash caused by a low-wage competitor. This circulates in the lower loop that depends on low-power money.
Those who live in the upper loop of the economy don't wish to participate in the crash of the lower loop. They escape the crashing deflation of the lower loop by debasing / printing high-power money. Unfortunately, there is some bleed-over from the upper loop to the lower loop. All that free money has raised prices somewhat. Would-be consumers in the lower loop have cut back on consumption so, prices haven't risen as much as they could have.
None of that free money has seeped into wages because it is too convenient to just outsource or automate whenever wages are perceived as being a burden. Once again, our crash into a low-wage competitor.
The upper loop continues to party on, fueled by free money from the debasement of high-powered money.
With a slight nod to the lower loop, the upper loop engages in currency wars to try to maintain employment in the value added industries. The inflation of the currency wars diminishes the purchasing power of the lumpen in the lower loop so, it really doesn't help.
The head is surviving but, the body is decomposing. It must be time for gun control.
Bank loans are called "low power money". They are created out of nothing and carry an interest burden. If you borrow $ 100,000, you must repay $ 300,000. The additional $ 200,000 is not created with the original principle and must be taken from low-power funds created for later loans. It is obvious that credit must continuously expand to provide the funds to service previous loans. There can be no interruption in expansive credit creation.
When the West crashed into a low-wage competitor, employment crashed. If remunerative employment has crashed, how can credit creation continue to expand? That $ 200,000 must come from somewhere to service all the endangered debt.
The brother of low-power money is high-power money.
"For the United States, the components of high-powered money are
gold coin or certificates and other money fully backed by gold; paper
money or deposit balances not secured by gold reserves but constituting
a liability of the Treasury or (since 1915) of Federal Reserve Banks"
http://www.nber.org/chapters/c1642.pdf
In a general sense, high-power money ( base money ) is gold or GOV notes that do not carry an interest burden.
In 2008, when credit crashed, enormous amounts of debt were in danger of default. There was not enough low-power money circulating to supply the demand. The system lacked low-power money so, the difference had to be made up with high-powered money.
TARP was created so that FED money could be created to rescue endangered debt. In reality, the employment crash was hugely deflationary. TARP money could not reflate the economy if it was debt money subject to repayment on interest and principle. Senator Inhofe reported that the TARP money was not repaid. That solved the problem of how to inject high-power money into the economy when low-power money was insufficient.
Possibly, Sen Inhofe angered somebody because a plane fell out of the sky that was carrying his son.
Low-power money is highly deflationary because of the interest drain. In the good times, new credit creation supplies the funds that pay the ever-increasing interest burden. The Treasury supplies high-power money to top off the system when there are temporary hiccups in the supply of low-power money. The Western crash into a low-wage competitor is not a temporary retraction in employment. It is not a temporary retraction in the demand for new credit. The FED has only one set of tools in it's bag of tricks.
It can lower interest rates and / or inject high-power money.
In the final analysis, the lower loop of the economy must depend on employment and value-added industry to supply it's needs. Without these 2 assets, it can not escape the high deflation of the interest drain that accompanies low-power money. The upper loop of the economy can count on the injection of high-power money to sustain itself.
Previously, high-power money was created gold-backed. In today's world, high-power money is created ex nihilo much the same as low-powered money. This blurring of distinction is responsible for the blurring of inflation / deflation.
A return to gold backing for ( purportedly ) high-power money would severely reduce the ability of the PTB to create free money for themselves.
Without the limitation of gold backing, there is no limitation of "money" creation. The limitation on the creation of low-power money is the creditworthiness of the would-be receiver.
GOV and banks are non-producers and most certainly do not want their access to funds to be restrained by their creditworthiness.
This is true of all non-producers; beggars, bankers and bureaucrats. NONE of them want to be limited by their creditworthiness. They are NOT ABLE to blow a bubble in low-power money so, they blow a bubble in high-power money. The crash in the producing economy is mostly a crash caused by a low-wage competitor. This circulates in the lower loop that depends on low-power money.
Those who live in the upper loop of the economy don't wish to participate in the crash of the lower loop. They escape the crashing deflation of the lower loop by debasing / printing high-power money. Unfortunately, there is some bleed-over from the upper loop to the lower loop. All that free money has raised prices somewhat. Would-be consumers in the lower loop have cut back on consumption so, prices haven't risen as much as they could have.
None of that free money has seeped into wages because it is too convenient to just outsource or automate whenever wages are perceived as being a burden. Once again, our crash into a low-wage competitor.
The upper loop continues to party on, fueled by free money from the debasement of high-powered money.
With a slight nod to the lower loop, the upper loop engages in currency wars to try to maintain employment in the value added industries. The inflation of the currency wars diminishes the purchasing power of the lumpen in the lower loop so, it really doesn't help.
The head is surviving but, the body is decomposing. It must be time for gun control.
Comment