One logical problem.
=.
On the one hand:
We cannot reach constant speed of photon (c=1)
but we say that photon exists.
One the other hand :
We cannot reach absolute zero ( T= 0K) but we can read:
‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
simple have no meaning.’
/ Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’ . Page 138.
by Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 /
==,
The logical problem is:
Why to one and the same problem ( we cannot reach , , . )
we give two different solutions:
a )photon exist and has meaning , , but
b) there is such a thing as absolute zero . . . . .but it has no meaning ?
==..
Maybe therefore someone wrote:
' If you try to search for 'reference frame ' for the photon
'emission & re-emission', you will find only some
'Quantum-Mechanics' Mumbo jumbo and very little else.'
==..
=.
On the one hand:
We cannot reach constant speed of photon (c=1)
but we say that photon exists.
One the other hand :
We cannot reach absolute zero ( T= 0K) but we can read:
‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
simple have no meaning.’
/ Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’ . Page 138.
by Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 /
==,
The logical problem is:
Why to one and the same problem ( we cannot reach , , . )
we give two different solutions:
a )photon exist and has meaning , , but
b) there is such a thing as absolute zero . . . . .but it has no meaning ?
==..
Maybe therefore someone wrote:
' If you try to search for 'reference frame ' for the photon
'emission & re-emission', you will find only some
'Quantum-Mechanics' Mumbo jumbo and very little else.'
==..
Comment