Philosophy of Physics / Science ?

[TheoriaApophasis]

I see youre incredibly delusional



quantum BS




You have utterly NO connection to Platonic dialectics or its ontology.

[socratus]

I see youre incredibly delusional

quantum BS

You have utterly NO connection to Platonic dialectics or its ontology.

" We are all agreed that your theory is crazy.
The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough
to have a chance of being correct.
My own feeling is that it is not crazy enough."
Niels Bohr
==..
My ideas so crazy that they are "incredibly delusional "
and therefore they must be right. / according to Niels Bohr /
I hope that in the future a physicist on the level Einstein, Bohr
will confirm this idea.
=.
P.S.
" Einstein was a giant.
His head was in the clouds, but his feet were on the ground.
Those of us who are not so tall have to choose! "
/ Richard Feynman,
as quoted in Collective Electrodynamics : Quantum Foundations
of Electromagnetism (2002) by Carver A. Mead, p. xix /
==..

[socratus]

An alternative to the "big bang", “black hole”, “ideal gas”
=
In the 1973 the Universe was in the condition T=2,7K. ( Nobel prize )
Today in the 2014 this condition is a little less than T=2,7K
and " tomorrow" this condition will be T=0K.
Therefore I will say:
It was, is, it will be forever an infinite, eternal, absolute reference frame T=0K.
On this infinite scene there are located gravity systems
on which human tries to understand the reality.
==
In the T=0K exists some kind of "virtual" negative imaginary particles.
These imaginary quantum particles are as real particles as positive Newtonian ones.
#
Kirchhoff's black body - light go in and don't come back.
Black holes - light go in and don't come back.
Zero Vacuum - light go in and don't come back.
===
Black - holes have temperature about absolute zero
(60 nanokelvin - 60 billionths of a kelvin).
" Ideal Gas" has temperature T=0K.
The Cosmos as whole has temperature T=0K.
===
My conclusion.
a)
Kirchhoff's black body, black holes , "ideal gas" are models of zero vacuum.
b)
All laws of an "ideal gas" and "quantum theory" can be used
to explain the initial / primary conditions of the Existance.
c)
It seems that in the future heat death of the universe can come.
(according to the logic of big bang )
But thanks to Planck's and Hawking radiations
( vacuum fluctuation, tunneling barrier )
the Universe can escape heat death.
====.

Black holes mathematically impossible: Study
/ Sep 29, 2014 /
However, in her new work, Mersini-Houghton showed that
by giving off this radiation, the star also sheds mass.
So much so that as it shrinks it no longer has the density
to become a black hole.

Before a black hole can form, the dying star swells one last time and then explodes.
A singularity never forms and neither does an event horizon.

The take home message of the work is clear:
there is no such thing as a black hole, researchers said.

Black holes mathematically impossible: Study - The Times of India
==…

[socratus]

God / gods and Mathematics / Physics / Quantum theory.
=.
" Mathematics is the language in which the gods speak to people."
/ Plato /
It means that religion without mathematical / physical background
can be fiction. It means that all different gods / religions must have one
common mathematical / physical basis.
It means that Brahman, Zeus, YHWH , God, Allah, . . . Supreme Creator,
the Supreme Being . . . and so on . . . . must know physical laws and
formulas to create Existence. It means that Brahman, Zeus, YHWH , God,
as the ONE (!) cannot create Universe without physical laws and formulas.
#
Charles de Montesquieu wrote:
" Everybody creates his God according to his own image and spirit.
If triangles made a God they would give him three sides."
/ Charles de Montesquieu . Persian Letters, 1721 /
But if physicists make a God, they would give Him concrete
mathematical / physical parameters.
#
Eddington wrote:
The Reasons of a modern science give, maybe
the opportunity to make the conclusion
that the religion became acceptable
for sensible scientific mind, since 1927.
/ Arthur Stanley . Eddington /.
It means that from 1927 the modern science ( quantum theory )
can explain "religion" by math / physical laws and formulas.
It means that Quantum theory can explain not only the earthly
matters but the heavenly matters too and unite them together,
#
" Realistically, . . . . Physically. . . . "
“ Everything we call real is made of things that cannot be regarded as real.
If quantum mechanics hasn't profoundly shocked you,
you haven't understood it yet.”
/ ― Niels Bohr /
If my idea that " The secret of God, Soul and Existence
is hidden in the Quantum theory of Vacuum and Light "
hasn't shocked you, you haven't understood it yet.
=====.. .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus
====. .

Gödel’s Proof that God Exists
==..
How Modal Logic Proved Gödel was Right, and God Exists
/ October 31, 2013 by Mike DeHaan /
A recent headline claimed that Computer Scientists
‘Prove’ God Exists. What is the real story beneath the headline?
Who wrote the proof?
How did the scientists prove that God exists?
Finally – just what is “modal logic”?

Gödel’s Proof that God Exists

Christoph Benzmüller and Bruno W Paleo wrote a brief article
describing the verification of Kurt Gödel’s proof of God’s existence.
- - - - - - - -
Both Gödel and Euclid Used Axioms and Logic
- - - - - - - -
What is Modal Logic?
Modal logic deals with statements, or propositions, that express
“possibility” and “necessity.”

Many of us are more familiar with less expressive
“propositional logic,” limited to “if something exists” or
“if all somethings have this property.”

Benzmüller and Paleo’s paper states that they used several different
modal logic systems to verify Gödel’s proof.
Those are different logic systems, not just different computer programs
- - - - - - - -
God Exists, Says Math: Modal Logic and Software Prove Gödel's Logic
/ October 31, 2013 /
====…
One problem.
" Both Gödel and Euclid Used Axioms and Logic"
And from one of Euclidian axiom the Non-Euclidian
(Lobachevsky, Bolyai, Riemann) geometry was created.
===…

[socratus]

Two epochs: Planck's and Weinberg's.
=.
On October 7. 1900 Heinrich Rubens told Planck that Wien's formula
did not fit the long wavelengths. That evening Planck had the correct
formula. For many – many physicists this discovery was quiet enough.
But Planck did a second step, a step farther. He asked:
why can this formula fit for all wavelengths remarkably well?

" I had to find a theoretical explanation at any cost . . . ." . . . . .
" . . . . eventually after some weeks of the hardest work of my life,
light entered the darkness, and a new inconceivable perspective
opened up before me. ..."
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/h...es/Planck.html

And this " new inconceivable perspective" was "quant".
==…
Today nobody asks "why?": if calculations are right and engineering
system works - it is enough. And what is about the meaning?
Meaning?
‘ Most scientists use quantum mechanics every day in they
working lives without needing to worry about the fundamental
problem of its interpretation.
. . .they do not worry about it. A year or so ago . . . . .
our conversation turned to a young theorist who had been quite
promising as a graduate student and who had then dropped
out of sight. I asked Phil what had interfered with the
ex-student’s research. Phil shook his head sadly and said:
‘ He tried to understand quantum mechanics.’ (!)
/ Book ‘Dreams of a final theory’. Page 66. By Steven Weinberg.
The Nobel Prize winner in Physics 1979 /
Many – many (including Bonzes of Physics with Nobel Prize)
put far aside attempts to understand QM.
They say: "As long as I can calculate the engineering quantum
system and it works, I'm OK - I can live with the side-effects."
====.
Two different epochs: epoch of searching the "why" it works
(new era) and epoch of "how" to calculate an engineering
quantum system (technological progress). But what is the value
of technological progress without understanding?
( . . . but . . . on the other hand . . .
. . . . not every year History makes "a new era")
===…