Brexit, Disaster or new beginning

[mbrownn]

Brexit, Disaster or new beginning.

Just interested in peoples points of view over the British exit from the European Union. Feel free to give your opinion.

Is it a good or a bad thing?

What did you think about how the two sides handled the debate?

[quantumfanatic]

BREXIT
Most readers of the news will rejoice over Britain’s exit from the EU, as reported. It’s not that we have a stake in Britain’s internal affairs, but because this issue has as much to do with global government as it does with national prosperity. In other words, this is a setback for the BIG strategy to put elitist politicians and bankers into control of the entire world – and that affects all of us at the macro level.
It is tempting to give a victory shout and boast that this is the beginning of the end for the globalists, but we know from long experience that they do not give up that easily. Even before the Brexit vote took place, undoubtedly they had prepared Plan-B for just such an outcome.
It is not hard to imagine what such a plan would include. The proven technique for herding the masses into places they would not otherwise choose is to cause them to experience fear and panic. In modern times, this has become an important part of political science in which grotesque enemies are engineered and manufactured with great precision. False-flag attacks are the new normal, and there even is a talent agency that provides ‘crisis actors’ to corporate and government clients around the world.
Everything is possible – including a return to the EU – if people are in fear for their lives as a result of war, terrorism, economic collapse, or civil disorder, all of which can be arranged. It is an eerie feeling knowing that there are people in high places, like Maurice Strong, a UN icon for internationalism, who, not only long for the economic destruction of advanced countries, but are in positions to bring it about. It was Strong who said:
What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principle risk to the earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? … The group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?
The current victory over the EU is not the beginning of the end, but the end of the beginning of a long and fierce contest between the forces of global tyranny and personal freedom. It is good to rejoice and celebrate, but the next battle is coming, and we must now prepare

[mbrownn]

@quantumfanatic

I like your analysis and agree with your position of caution

[Danny B]

The Kalergi Plan

In his book Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism), Kalergi declared that the people of the future “United States of Europe” will not be the original peoples of the Old Continent, but a kind of bestial subhumans made by miscegenation. Kalergi stated in no uncertain terms that you must cross the peoples of Europe with Asian races and color, to create a multiethnic flock without quality and easily controllable by the ruling.

“The man of the future will be of mixed blood. The future Eurasian-Negroid race, very similar to the ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples, with a variety of personalities.”

Austrian writer Gerd Honsik describes the essence of the Kalergi plan:

Kalergi proclaims the abolition of the right of self-determination and, subsequently, the elimination of nations by means of ethnic separatist movements or mass allogeneic (genetically dissimilar) immigration. In order for Europe to be mastered by the elite, homogeneous peoples are transformed into a mixed race of whites, blacks and Asians. Kalergi characterized these mestizos as cruel and unfaithful, and maintained that the elite must deliberately create the mestizos to achieve their own superiority.

https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/201...hite-genocide/
Rense; Lord Rothschild Demands Britain Stay In Europe!

I've been in the tomb of Tuthmosis III in the valley of the Kings. The frescoes show very clearly that the Egyptians were a Semitic people. There are black Nubians pictured very clearly but, the Egyptians are very well distinguished from the Nubians

"Europe’s political leaders know that Kalergi was the author of the European Union. Though unknown to the public and untaught in schools, Kalergi is the father of Maastricht and multiculturalism, "
"[White] genocide is also the basis of the UN’s welcoming policy toward millions of immigrants to compensate for Europe’s low birth rate. According to a UN report released in January 2000, entitled “Replacement Migration: a solution to declining and aging populations,” Europe would need 159 million immigrants by the year 2025. "
"As G. Brock Chisholm, former director of the World Health Organization (WHO) and a good disciple of Kalergi, said [in 1955]:

“In all places, people must practice the limitation of births and racially mixed marriages so as to create a single race in a new world dependent on a central authority.”

"piano kalergi, un genocidio legalizzato ..... De Hollande et Sarkozy ą Merkel, de Juncker ą Cameron et Obama,"
Immigration massive: Le plan Kalergi de destruction des peuples européens. : Laurent Leisi, résistant citoyen

The Angles and Saxons have had enough of this c-r-a-p. The Normans (Hollande) are embracing it. The Huns think it is great. (Merkel)

[Danny B]

Not even close to politically correct

There are 3 great "movements" at this present time. Israel is in great danger of being over run by Islam. They orchestrated the bombing in NYC and the follow-up wars. This created HUGE amounts of islamic enemies. Thanks to the miracle of jet travel, they can be here in a jiffy. Islam was/is a danger to israel. Until we stirred up the hornet's nest, they were no particular danger to America. BUT, Islam has long been a danger to the world,, particularly if you are Christian; https://www.opendoorsusa.org/christi...ld-watch-list/

Israel wanted to give us a wake-up call to the danger. We were / are the slowly boiling frog. Maybe they think they did us a favor by blowing up the towers. These neo-con wars have inundated Europe with lots of trash. BUT, America is starting to perceive that islam might just be a danger.
That is plot one.

Many of our "leaders' are trying to squeeze us into world socialism with the attendant one-world control. They figure that total control and a police State is the answer to total automation. I'm no friend of the .001% BUT, the 1% mostly worked hard for their money,, NOT all of their money. GOV largess has given them quite a windfall lately. They amount to 33 million Americans and foreigners. Elon Musk is from South Africa,,, to name just one. That is quite a big cohort.
World socialism. That is plot two

Then, there is an ongoing effort at population reduction. The unfolding crash will probably stop international credit. You never know who is broke. Many States will bring back gold and still do international commerce. America's natural gold is gone. John Bedini's acquaintance, Sajeka (sp) said that America can make elemental gold by transmutation,,, dunno. A crash in international commerce will starve out many millions of people,,, many of them muslims.
Population reduction is plot three.
There are other plots of course. Minor things like world domination, et al.

Obviously, these plots are formulated by men. Hollande has admitted that he wants to stupidize and darken the European population. Women are going to have a BIG say in the matter. Women are looking for the most successful mate that they can find. They don't want to marry a jerk. That is the main reason for arranged marriages,,, so the jerks can have kids.. Women just aren't going to go for the idea of being hooked up with "kind of bestial subhumans"

What kind of economy would we have with a stupidized population?
" I discussed the low average African IQ of 70 reported by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen in their path-breaking book IQ and the Wealth of Nations.

As their IQ map of the world illustrates, the average IQ for all countries is 90 (The Wealth of Nations is mapped by their IQ, By Glen Owen, November 10, 2003). Less than one in five countries has national IQs equal or near the British norm of 100. Almost half the countries have national IQs of 90 or less.

If IQ and the Wealth of Nations is correct that an average IQ of 90 forms the threshold for a technological economy, this poses a serious problem."
How is It Possible that Africans Have an Average IQ of 70? | Daily Stormer
" Finally, I'm going to go over a relatively new hypothesis for why Sub-Saharan Africans score lower than other races on IQ tests... the Microcephalin gene.

Sub-Saharan Africans differ from all other world populations in that they do not have any Neanderthal ancestry. When the ancestors of all humans were first leaving Africa, they split into two groups, one stayed in Africa (Sub-Saharan Africans) and the other moved into the Middle East (the ancestors of all other non-Sub-Saharan humans). The second group mated with some Neanderthals, and gained the MCPH1 Microcephalin, which causes a significant increase in brain size during development. "
https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenandHone...stently_score/

Mother Nature wants her children to be the best that they can be. I think that she would frown on any kind of regression.

[Danny B]

Farage and Stockman

Nigel Farage on Brexit; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woaS1b_seEM

Stockman on Brexit; Stockman: "At Last The Tyranny Of The Global Financial Elite Has Been Slammed" | Zero Hedge

[quantumfanatic]

Have you noticed how hard the controlled alternative press are working to convince you that the globalists / NWO / banksters are frightened by the BREXIT result?…
drudgeglobalists
brxb
brxc
…From the Drudge Report, Breitbart, and Infowars

Well nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, the collapse of the European Union is a necessary step in building the New World Order the Rockefellers and Kissinger outlined back in their late 1950’s NWO implementation plan…
nwovision26su
…From Prospect for America: The Rockefeller Panel Reports

Take special note of the first passage: “The hoped-for result is peace in a world divided into smaller units…” So is the EU a “smaller unit”? No, an EU superstate with its own army is a larger unit than its constituent nation-states, so it clearly wasn’t built to be part of the real New World Order. Rather, it was built as an expendable tool to help the globalists get to the New World Order.

So what was the EU’s raison d’etre, you ask? To tie as many European nations as possible into a political and currency union, then crash the union to create political and economic chaos. And on the currency side of it, they put the planned result of this crash right on the cover of The Economist back in 1988…
ecophoenixxx
…From Mainstream globalist propaganda reveals East/West conflict is a farce

On the cover, you see national currencies burning in a bonfire (The Great Economic Crisis of 2016), as well as a phoenix arising from the flames (in 2018). This phoenix represents a new global currency, and this is what the article said about it…

>>> THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency. Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let’s say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favoured by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today’s national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the last twentieth century…

…The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power…

…The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF…

…Governments are far from ready to subordinate their domestic objectives to the goal of international stability. Several more big exchange-rate upsets, a few more stockmarket crashes and probably a slump or two will be needed before politicians are willing to face squarely up to that choice…

…Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes. <<<
As the article suggests, national currencies will not disappear after this year’s crisis (although the Euro will). But they will become increasingly disused as the banksters make it more attractive to use the new global currency. As for the euro, it is a component of the IMF’s SDR, so the IMF might make arrangements to allow its member nations to exchange their worthless euros for a special allotment of SDRs (the citizens would trade their euros for their new national currencies, then their governments would trade the amassed euros for IMF SDRs). This would turn the world’s existing euro reserves into SDR reserves in a single stroke, thus aiding the new global currency in its rise.

It is worth noting that the “evil Western globalists'” supposed opponents, the Chinese, are fully cooperating in this “SDR to phoenix” plot. Just have a look at a 2009 speech from China’s central banker, Zhou Xiaochuan, titled Reform the International Monetary System. Here are some key excerpts…

>>> The desirable goal of reforming the international monetary system, therefore, is to create an international reserve currency that is disconnected from individual nations and is able to remain stable in the long run, thus removing the inherent deficiencies caused by using credit-based national currencies…

The scope of using the SDR should be broadened, so as to enable it to fully satisfy the member countries’ demand for a reserve currency.

> Set up a settlement system between the SDR and other currencies. Therefore, the SDR, which is now only used between governments and international institutions, could become a widely accepted means of payment in international trade and financial transactions.

> Actively promote the use of the SDR in international trade, commodities pricing, investment and corporate book-keeping. This will help enhance the role of the SDR, and will effectively reduce the fluctuation of prices of assets denominated in national currencies and related risks.

> Create financial assets denominated in the SDR to increase its appeal. The introduction of SDR-denominated securities, which is being studied by the IMF, will be a good start.

> Further improve the valuation and allocation of the SDR. The basket of currencies forming the basis for SDR valuation should be expanded to include currencies of all major economies, and the GDP may also be included as a weight. The allocation of the SDR can be shifted from a purely calculation-based system to a system backed by real assets, such as a reserve pool, to further boost market confidence in its value. <<<
Isn’t it remarkable how the Chinese are calling for the very same role for the SDR that the “evil Western globalists” have been planning all along? Can you think any others who’ve been screaming about the need to move away from “credit-based national currencies” in favor of currencies “backed by real assets, such as a reserve pool” and gold? That would be practically all of the alternative media, right? This is because practically all of the alternative media either work for the globalists or parrot the globalist message out of lack of discernment.

Now if we look at the political side of the EU collapse, what happened last year during the globalists’ aborted attempt to start the collapse using the Greek debt crisis…

“…the globalists intend to take down the EU central government and break Europe into smaller units bound by a new regional multilateral framework.” – From The Greek “People’s Revolution” and the New European Renaissance, brought to you by the NWO

Prospect for America: The Rockefeller Panel Reports
From Mainstream globalist propaganda reveals East/West conflict is a farce
From the Drudge Report, Breitbart, and Infowars

[quantumfanatic]

George Soros


And wouldn’t you know it, George Soros chimed in over the weekend to talk about “thoroughly reconstructing” the EU…
soroseu
…From Fortune

So what form will the new “EU” take, you ask? It will no longer be a strong federalizing force for its member nations; most likely, it will be a relatively weak “multilateral framework for cooperation” that offers a-la-carte conventions onto which the nations of the region can sign (if they so wish). And getting them to wish to participate in the new framework is where the “smaller units” concept comes into play.

As we go forward, the globalists will go beyond merely breaking up the EU. They’ll also be breaking many EU nations into smaller units. This is what I wrote about it last year in The globalist plan to break up the great nations…

BEGIN EXCERPT>>>

The globalists want the NWO to consist of “smaller units” because smaller nations are less likely to be self-sufficient in maintaining their security and a modern standard of living. They want all the nations to be dependent on the multilateral framework for their security and economic wellbeing.

Besides the Rockefellers’ NWO architects, can you guess who else is talking about “smaller units”? Ron Paul (in this interview on RT)…

“I happen to believe in smaller units of government; the larger the unit of government, the worse things are…

So I think people should have the right to leave a larger unit of government.”

And what else is Ron Paul talking about? Secession in the US…
paulsecession
…Note that he gave this speech at a Mises Institute conference called Breaking Away: The Case for Secession…

[Starting from the 1:20 mark] – “I would like to start off by talking about the subject, and the subject, of course, is secession and nullification — the breaking up of government. And the good news is it’s gonna happen. It’s happening. And it’s not gonna be because there will be enough people in the US Congress to legislate it — it won’t happen. It will be de facto.”
So we know the globalists are aiming to break up the EU (which is the Interim World Order in Europe), and Greece is where that will begin. But will they also break up the USA so it can never rise again as the power it once was? Will Russia and China meet the same fate at some point?

With that last question in mind, have a look at an Economist article I ran across today…
breakrussia
…”UNDER Vladimir Putin’s presidency, Russia is seen in the outside world as an expansionist power trying to revise post-Soviet borders and rebuild an empire. But what if Russia itself—a country of nearly 200 nationalities that stretches across 11 time zones—is in danger of crumbling?”

It is quite interesting to see this coming out of the Economist. If we look back to the their infamous cover from early this year, we see Putin (and other major leaders including America’s Obama, China’s Xi, and India’s Modi) presented in the color of ash….
Economist2014_cover_“ü¨eol
…which is the color of the phoenix eggs on the woman’s hat. This would indicate that those leaders will be part of the ash heap from which the NWO phoenix will rise.

After seeing the Economist article, I decided to check into China and came across this Wall Street Journal article…
breakchina
…”Despite appearances, China’s political system is badly broken, and nobody knows it better than the Communist Party itself. China’s strongman leader, Xi Jinping, is hoping that a crackdown on dissent and corruption will shore up the party’s rule. He is determined to avoid becoming the Mikhail Gorbachev of China, presiding over the party’s collapse. But instead of being the antithesis of Mr. Gorbachev, Mr. Xi may well wind up having the same effect. His despotism is severely stressing China’s system and society—and bringing it closer to a breaking point.”

Interesting.

Upon checking into India, I came across this academia.edu paper from Arshi Saleem Hashmi. Here is a germane passage…
breakindia1
breakindia2
…(from pages 38-39)

It makes sense that the globalists will want to break up the large nations because it fits in to their PR strategy of restoring the appearance of sovereignty (while actually undermining sovereignty by making the divided peoples less able to resist the power of the globalist institutions). Once separated from their central governments, the newly-minted nations will need assistance in getting started, and to whom will they turn for guidance and help? To the United Nations and the multilateral institutions of course! They will turn away from the old power centers of Washington, Moscow, Beijing, and New Delhi and turn towards the new power center, the UN Complex. And this predictable dynamic gives us a clue as to the timeframe during which the breakups will occur.

Common sense suggests that the great nations will be broken up once the multilateral institutions and agreements that will pick up the pieces are finalized. That way, when they break up into their smaller components, those components will be offered continued membership in the multilateral institutions their former central governments set up. And since they’ll need help, they’ll accept that continued membership and thus become dependent on the UN and the regional and functional multilateral institutions (just like the Rockefellers planned back in the 1950’s). Given that the BRICS institutions have been rushed into existence this year, I would expect the breakups to occur sometime between September of this year and 2020, with most of it done by 2018.
<<<END EXCERPT

Are you starting to see the big picture now?