One big idea has been banned from Physics.

[socratus]

One big idea has been banned from Physics.
=====…
“ . . . . . at least one big idea is missing.
How do we find that missing idea? “
/ Book: “ The trouble with Physics” By Lee Smolin, page 308 /

Sorry, the “big idea” is not missing in Physics.
In my opinion is more correct to say:
“One big idea has been banned from Physics”
What big idea is banished?
The big banished idea in Physics is the endless infinite void –
- the Vacuum, the Zero Vacuum: T=0K.
=======…
Some scientists wrote:
#
When the next revolution rocks physics, chances are it will be
about nothing—the vacuum, that endless infinite void.
Nothingness of Space Could Illuminate the Theory of Everything | DiscoverMagazine.com
#
“ The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? “
/ Paul Dirac /
#
"Vacuum -- the very name suggests emptiness and nothingness –
is actually a realm rife with potentiality, courtesy of the laws
of quantum electrodynamics (QED). According to QED,
additional, albeit virtual, particles can be created in the vacuum,
allowing light-light interactions."
| American Institute of Physics
#
“The most fundamental question facing 21st century physics will be:
What is the vacuum? As quantum mechanics teaches us, with
its zero point energy this vacuum is not empty and the word
vacuum is a gross misnomer!”
/ Prof. Friedwardt Winterberg /
#
"Now we know that the vacuum can have all sorts of wonderful effects
over an enormous range of scales, from the microscopic to the cosmic,"
said Peter Milonni
from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.
#
etc . . . . .
============. . .
Today the “official physics” does not recognize the absolute,
endless and infinite kingdom of vacuum: T=0K.
Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’ by Steven Weinberg. Page 138.
‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
simple have no meaning.’
/ Steven Weinberg. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1979 /
But . . . .
S. Weinberg wrote another book: “The First Three Minutes”
(A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe . . . after big bang)
So, he know very well that in 1973 the temperature of the Universe
as whole was 2,7K and in the time “X” it will come to absolute zero.
But if the “temperatures below absolute zero simple have no meaning”
then . . . “ Big Bang” also doesn’t have meaning.
Someone must decide: “Where is logic in the Physics?”
===============…

[socratus]

Not standard model of physics.
==..
In the study of particle physics, the most powerful tool is
the accelerator. Two most important things need for accelerator:
high energy and deep vacuum.
The higher the energy and the deeper the vacuum levels that
can be reached – and the tinier the structures that can be explored.
#
The picture of modern particle physics is saddled with Standard Model.
The Standard Model embraces a total of 18 particles.
Thanks to accelerators more than 20 Nobel Prizes have been awarded
to scientists who contributed to the Standard Model.
====…
a)
If the accelerator is model of Nature then Nature itself must have
infinite high energy and the deepest vacuum level. Then there isn’t
place for the hot (!) singular point as beginning of existence.
b)
Temperature requires separation and movement of particles.
A singularity is defined as to have no separation, no movement.
Without movement there isn’t temperature.
c)
The high density of singular point is equal to the singular point of deep
vacuum, therefor it is possible that nature started from singular point of
vacuum, it means from singular quantum particle in the point of vacuum.
d)
The deepest vacuum level in Nature is the cosmic vacuum: T=0K.
This deepest vacuum (T=0K) is itself some kind of infinite energy.
This infinite energy gives birth to “virtual particles”: E=Mc^2.
These virtual particles” was called “dark matter and dark energy”.
“Dark masses and energy” of these “virtual particles” are more
than 90% in the nature and they created a few % of visual matter
in Nature.
============…

[socratus]

One Sisyphus project in modern Physics.
=====…
Scientists try to unify four fundamental forces:
electromagnetic, strong, weak and gravity.
a)
In 1979 the Nobel Prize was awarded to physicists who
merged electromagnetic and the weak nuclear forces in a single
framework: electroweak theory.
b)
Uniting the strong force with the electroweak picture has not been easy.
However, many physicists believe that at very high energies, the
electroweak and the strong forces would behave as one.
That unification is known as the search for a “grand unified theory”
c)
The theory that may finally include all four fundamental forces as one
(electromagnetic, strong, weak and gravity) is known as the search
for a “theory of everything”.
============…
My opinion.
So, on a large macro cosmic scale scientists gathered all masses and
energies into “ singular point” and on a micro scale this picture repeat
itself when scientists try to merge all four forces at very high
energies as one singular force.
I call this scientific plan to understand micro world as a “Sisyphus project”.
Why?
Because behavior of particles at very high energies was explained
by Paul Dirac in 1928. According to Dirac at a “sea of vacuum”
quantum particles (forces) will be changed into virtual particles
with negative energy / mass: -E= Mc^2. (!)
This “sea of vacuum” is an infinite continuum and it is some kind of
infinite energy and it is full with infinite numbers of particles: –E=Mc^2.
From these Dirac’s negative particles the creation and evolution of existence
was started. “ The theory of everything” only begins its way from Dirac’s
“sea of vacuum” and particles of negative energy/mass: -E= Mc^2.
====…
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
===…

[marathonman]

Dreaming

All the billions and billions of dollars wasted trying to find a particle that doesn't exist. not all the money is used for it anyway, redirected to corporate pockets.
just another ploy to Steel tax payers money.

yah ! we need another accelerator like America needs another Obama or Hitler bush.

just think of all that money getting in the hands of free energy people. i could build millions of Figuera devices and sit back and laugh at Qm SR followers in their faces.

imagine what Walter Russel could of done with that money.

you pic above is exactly what present day scientist and physicist are doing today except the large ball is a ball bull crap.

[socratus]

Scientific “logic” as logic of science. / by Israel Socratus /
===…
Part one: macro – cosmic scientific logic.
a)
14 billion years ago the billions and billions of galaxies were
compressed into a “hot singular point”. It means that the four
forces of nature (electromagnetic, strong, weak and gravity) also
were compressed into one “singular point”- into one “singular force”.
b)
During the earliest moments following big bang explosion –
- roughly the first 10^-43 seconds – the temperature and density
of the universe had cooled to a balmy 10^15 degrees Celsius
and the four forces of nature went their separate ways.

Part two: micro – quantum scientific logic.

Scientists try to unify four fundamental forces of nature:
a)
In 1979 the Nobel Prize was awarded to physicists who
merged electromagnetic and the weak nuclear forces in a single
framework: electroweak theory.
“ Although these two forces appear very different at everyday
low energies, the theory models them as two different aspects
of the same force. . . . . .
The existence of the electroweak interactions was experimentally
established in two stages, the first being the discovery of neutral
currents in neutrino scattering by the Gargamelle collaboration
in 1973, and the second in 1983 by the UA1 and the UA2
collaborations that involved the discovery of the W and Z
gauge bosons in proton–antiproton collisions at the converted
Super Proton Synchrotron.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroweak_interaction
b)
Physicists believe that at very high energies, the electroweak and
the strong forces would behave as one.
That unification is known as the search for a “grand unified theory”
c)
Physicists believe that at very – very high energies (!) all four
fundamental forces of nature would behave as one. That project
is known as the search for a “theory of everything”.
============…
My conclusion.
At the earth’s conditions we cannot reach the cosmic conditions.
It means we cannot merge all four fundamental forces of nature.
It means we don’t need more powerful LHC (useless machine)
It means the CERN project can be taken in archives.
=============…

“But I don’t want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can’t help that," said the Cat:
"we’re all mad here. I’m mad. You’re mad."
"How do you know I’m mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn’t have come here.”
― Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland

============

[socratus]

You can test and understand scientific plan to unify all four forces
(electromagnetic, strong, weak and gravity) at very high energies
into one singular force in your home conditions:
a) take four eggs ,
b) break them,
c) make omelet with homogeneous structure,
d) try to understand, what chicken is.

Good appetite, and remember,
in our eggs – our forces (more than four).
=====…

[socratus]

To have an omelet takes an outside energy source to make it happen.
Exactly in this way the physicists work.
They use outside energy and deep vacuum (LHC) to create
new quantum particles.
They don’t think about nature of energy itself.
As Feynman said:
“ It is important to realize that in physics today,
we have no knowledge of what energy is.
We do not have a picture that energy comes in little
blobs of a definite amount.”
===…
Again.
LHC needs deep vacuum and high energy to create new tiny
quantum particles. If LHC is model of the Universe then the
absolute vacuum T=0K with infinite energy can also create
tiny quantum particles: -E=Mc^2.
And . . . if LHC isn’t model of the Universe (!) . . .
. . then . . . why we need this big machine.
===========…

[socratus]

Remember:
In the Alice’s Wonderland the people in the cosmology,
gravity and particle programs don’t ask question
“Where did the masses and forces (for singularity, big bang
and existence) come from?”
====..

Another example of scientific “logic” as logic of science:
What big bang creates black hole takes away . . . (into singular point?)
========…

[socratus]

T=0K and Reality.
==..
a)
We cannot reach the absolute vacuum T=0K by experiments
but this physical fact doesn’t say that the absolute vacuum is
hollow inside.
b)
In absolute vacuum exists infinite numbers of potential “virtual
particles”. We cannot reach the density and other parameters of
“virtual particles” by experiments but this physical fact doesn’t
say that these “virtual particles” are pure abstraction.
The examples:
#
“ Its effects can be observed in various phenomena
(such as spontaneous emission, the Casimir effect, the
van der Waals bonds, or the Lamb shift), and it is thought
to have consequences for the behavior of the Universe
on cosmological scales. “
/ Vacuum energy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

#
Theoreticians say that leaving our ‘atomistic- matter’
paradigm behind, and taking ‘virtual antiparticles’,
we realized that the Cosmos / Vacuum ‘polarized ‘
itself, and the result of this polarization we know as our world.
Vacuum polarization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

#
In quantum field theory, and specifically quantum electrodynamics,
vacuum polarization describes a process in which a background
electromagnetic field produces virtual electron–positron pairs that
change the distribution of charges and currents that generated
the original electromagnetic field. It is also sometimes referred
to as the self energy of the gauge boson (photon).
Vacuum polarization was observed experimentally in 1997 using
the TRISTAN particle accelerator in Japan.

Vacuum polarization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
#
Light Created from a Vacuum:
Casimir Effect Observed in Superconducting Circuit
/Science Daily (Nov. 18, 2011) /
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1118133050.htm
#
Chalmers scientists create light from vacuum
Chalmers scientists create light from vacuum | Chalmers

==============…

[socratus]

Can God create a Universe which physicists could not understand?
No.
Why?
Because at the moment when God began to create the material world,
He needed to use physical laws, formulas and equations. Then we can
come to the moment of His creation and grip His hand, look His features
and understand the picture of the Existence.
But here is one problem.
The problem is, that at the moment when we grip His hand,
He disappears (according to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle)
in His an infinite unseen house: T=0K.
So, we see the beginning of creation (quantum vacuum’s polarization /
fluctuation / transformation) but cannot understand the essence
of what is happened because physicists banned T=0K from Physics.
=======…

[socratus]

For example.
2014 : WHAT SCIENTIFIC IDEA IS READY FOR RETIREMENT?

Infinity / by Max Tegmark /

Our challenge as physicists is to discover this elegant way and
the infinity-free equations describing it—the true laws of physics.
To start this search in earnest, we need to question infinity.
I'm betting that we also need to let go of it.

https://www.edge.org/response-detail/25344

============…

Without “INFINITY” as T=0K we cannot understand
the essence of the true laws, formulas and equations of physics.
Israel Socratus
=====….

[socratus]

The essence of motion.
==..
There are two states of love:
a) The state “I love”
b) The state “ to be loved”
Everybody knows that they are two different states.

There are two states of motion:
a) The state “I move” (self-motion)
b) The state “ to be moved”
Everybody knows that they are two different states.

#
What set particles / objects in motion?
a) Newton’s theory explains movement as subject of
“ to be moved”: outwards forces set objects in motion,
b) Quantum theory explains movement as subject of “ I move”
(self-motion): internal forces (h and h*) set particles in motion.
This deference doesn’t understand in Physics.

#
Newtonian macro-world was created from quantum micro-world.
It means that the source of all motion and change in Nature is
quantum’s own self-impulses: h and h*
This situation doesn’t understand in Physics.
====…

Newton wrote:
“‘For the basic problem of philosophy seems to be to discover
the forces of nature from the phenomena of motions and then
to demonstrate the other phenomena from these forces.”
===..
It means to take the quantum forces of nature h and h* and then
try to demonstrate all the other phenomena from these forces.
===..
Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
====…