about the Ferrocell (ferrolens)

[Markoul]

Ken on Dielectric-Magneto conjugate field

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=No0TqvC9OeI[/VIDEO]

[Markoul]

First time ever - Complete torus field seen of the pole of a cube magnet

First time ever - Complete torus field seen of the pole of a cube magnet


part 1: [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhgb8dYupXM[/VIDEO]

part 2: [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24yHmnrVxeE[/VIDEO]

I have magnetically confined a small neodymium cube magnet at the center of a ferrite magnet under a ferrolens.

Complete torus field of the cube magnet pole emerges.

I am using a 6mm - 2 mm thick (i put the magnets under the 6mm thick glass), two optical glass disks demonstration ferrocell so ferrite ring magnet field is too weak to show up in the ferrolens and only the field of the much stronger neodymium cube magnet shows.

This video proves all dipole magnets have the same field geometry on their poles, namely a torus, independent physical shape of magnet.

Except the inner ring magnet field all other magnets extend their poles field on a ferrolens all the way up to the LED light strip of the ferrocell. However with this trick I have confined the field so it can curl as it would do in free space and show up in its complete geometrical shape on the ferrolens.

I used in addition a iron cup under the ferrolens for further magnetic confinement.


copyrightŠEmm Markoulakis TEI of Crete 2018

[Markoul]

Enormous holographic depth of field shown by magnetically confined ferrolens

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asiTMTKkMZc&feature=youtu.be[/VIDEO]


Pole view of the field of a cube magnet.

Notice the holographic depth of the field shown as I zoom in and out.

Specially at the the end of the video we can see the spiraling effect of the highlighted flux lines into the pole (black hole).

An iron cup (Rio Mare Tuna can) was used to under the ferrolens to magnetically confine the field for increased holographic depth of field effect.

This time I didn't use a ring magnet to confine the field but only the tuna can.

copyrightŠEmm Markoulakis TEI of Crete 2018

[Markoul]

Very important question concerning the ferrocell operation for Mike Palazolla

Very important question concerning the ferrocell operation only Mike Palazolla
can answer with his microscope!

Dear Mike,


if it is not much trouble for you, this is very important.

Specially for the field light lines on the Bloch domain wall (side view of magnet)

and for the lines on the poles (side view of magnet).

Do the nanoparticle chains forming, align (in parallel) with these light lines we observe on the ferrocell ? Or are the chains oriented perpendicular to these light lines we observe on the ferrocell?

This is the ultimate experiment for proving once and for all that the lines we see in the ferrocell are the actual flux or else called force lines of the magnetic field we observe with the ferrocell and also proves the torus field geometry observed with the ferrocell in contrast to the iron filings experiment.

In order the above to be true, case (a) of the following fig.1 must be the correct:



fig.1

Kind Regards,

EM

[dyetalon]

Very important question concerning the ferrocell operation only Mike Palazolla
can answer with his microscope!

Dear Mike,


if it is not much trouble for you, this is very important.

Specially for the field light lines on the Bloch domain wall (side view of magnet)

and for the lines on the poles (side view of magnet).

Do the nanoparticle chains forming, align (in parallel) with these light lines we observe on the ferrocell ? Or are the chains oriented perpendicular to these light lines we observe on the ferrocell?

This is the ultimate experiment for proving once and for all that the lines we see in the ferrocell are the actual flux or else called force lines of the magnetic field we observe with the ferrocell and also proves the torus field geometry observed with the ferrocell in contrast to the iron filings experiment.

In order the above to be true, case (a) of the following fig.1 must be the correct:



fig.1

Kind Regards,

EM

My tests and observations have shown 'A' to be correct.
They align parallel to the applied field, but can 'migrate' in clusters depending on the direction of the Lorentz force.

[Markoul]

My tests and observations have shown 'A' to be correct.
They align parallel to the applied field, but can 'migrate' in clusters depending on the direction of the Lorentz force.

Thank you Timm for you confirmation didn't know you had an optical microscope.

Then there is nothing else left essentially to prove.

Ferrocell is picking up a magnetic field and translating it 100% accordingly to light information. The light pattern matches 100% the magnetic field pattern and is projected holographically in a 2D surface.

The ferrocell is showing the flux of a magnetic field on its purest undisturbed form due the superparamagnetic single domain properties of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles thus the Quantum field of a magnet with all its details at the Bloch region.

Iron fillings imprint of magnetic field is an interference pattern of the iron filings with a magnet and therefore can not be considered as revealing the true geometry of a magnetic field and only show how ferromagnetic materials interact with the field of a magnet but not the magnetic field itself.

The torus field geometry for magnetic dipoles shown in the ferrocell is the correct one and not the shortcircuit one N-S shown by the iron filings.

Mission accomplished.

EM

[dyetalon]

A720 Migration to Donut Magnet 001-small.jpg

Thank you Timm for you confirmation didn't know you had an optical microscope.

Then there is nothing else left essentially to prove.

Ferrocell is picking up a magnetic field and translating it 100% accordingly to light information. The light pattern matches 100% the magnetic field pattern and is projected holographically in a 2D surface.

The ferrocell is showing the flux of a magnetic field on its purest undisturbed form due the superparamagnetic single domain properties of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles thus the Quantum field of a magnet with all its details at the Bloch region.

Iron fillings imprint of magnetic field is an interference pattern of the iron filings with a magnet and therefore can not be considered as revealing the true geometry of a magnetic field and only show how ferromagnetic materials interact with the field of a magnet but not the magnetic field itself.

The torus field geometry for magnetic dipoles shown in the ferrocell is the correct one and not the shortcircuit one N-S shown by the iron filings.

Mission accomplished.

EM

We did extensive examinations using microscopes back in 2007-8. I have hundreds of images and many movies of particle chaining and their motion.
Too bad my research partner died in 2008, or he would have continued taking great images like this one:


here's a hi-res image: http://www.ferrocell.us/images/A720%...gnet%20001.jpg

[bistander]

Circles of Apollonius

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=No0TqvC9OeI[/VIDEO]

Interesting vid. I assume the image on the left is like this (b, lower) although I never got a good look at it.


From: https://www.safaribooksonline.com/li...level1_1.xhtml

Also see: Circles of Apollonius… and magnetism! | Mathematical Gemstones

Ken discussed the pattern at length and says he'd have it tattooed if, you know, he had more surface area. He doesn't really get into the fact that his two images, of similar patterns, result from different causes. Obviously the image on the right side of his screen is a ferrocell stimulated by a PM. I'd really like to see what the ferrocell image would be resulting from a current carrying conductor (or pair of conductors) passing through the ferrocell perpendicularly. Like this.



Or this.



So I realize nobody is going to punch a hole in their cell to run the wire(s). But Michael had a cell with a one inch hole in the center. And there was a video posted here of two rectangular cells used to provide a slot in the middle for pass thru of a PM. Something like that would suffice, I think.

While researching the subject, I found this.



From: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/...fig1_252063502

You can download the article. It was very interesting to me. They use Fe-oxide superparamagnetic nanoparticles in fluid which appears similar to ferrofluid in the cells. Also of possible interest to others on this board is the use of micro Tesla coils.

Regards,

bi

[dyetalon]

Interesting vid. I assume the image on the left is like this (b, lower) although I never got a good look at it.


From: https://www.safaribooksonline.com/li...level1_1.xhtml

Also see: Circles of Apollonius… and magnetism! | Mathematical Gemstones

Ken discussed the pattern at length and says he'd have it tattooed if, you know, he had more surface area. He doesn't really get into the fact that his two images, of similar patterns, result from different causes. Obviously the image on the right side of his screen is a ferrocell stimulated by a PM. I'd really like to see what the ferrocell image would be resulting from a current carrying conductor (or pair of conductors) passing through the ferrocell perpendicularly. Like this.



Or this.



So I realize nobody is going to punch a hole in their cell to run the wire(s). But Michael had a cell with a one inch hole in the center. And there was a video posted here of two rectangular cells used to provide a slot in the middle for pass thru of a PM. Something like that would suffice, I think.

While researching the subject, I found this.



From: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/...g1_252063502Dr

You can download the article. It was very interesting to me. They use Fe-oxide superparamagnetic nanoparticles in fluid which appears similar to ferrofluid in the cells. Also of possible interest to others on this board is the use of micro Tesla coils.

Regards,

bi

The link doesn't work.

I have some glass with 1" hole in the center. They are left over from when I made that cell for Michael Snyder. I could build another cell with a couple disks, but these are the most difficult cells to make! Sealing the outer and inner edges are a *****.

Using a couple of rectangular cells would be much easier, but not the same. You are correct in the way the field looks in a hollow-center cell, the lines appear exactly where you expect them to be.
If he used two magnets, you would see the same image as Ken's- (the power line view).

Here's one of Michaels pix of a magnetic pole in the center of a hollow-center cell. There is a black cloth wrapped around the magnet and stuffed into the hole.



The coils you show on top of the magnets have their fields oriented in the same direction as the magnets. And, the fluid you describe is definitely ferrofluid.

[bistander]

Link fixed

You need to click from the linked page to get the full article. It's not too long or deep into math.

I just don't see anything done with EM (electromagnetism) and ferrocells.

bi

[dyetalon]

You need to click from the linked page to get the full article. It's not too long or deep into math.

I just don't see anything done with EM (electromagnetism) and ferrocells.

bi

Look at this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMssut5ik9A

I'm making a 'ring' in the cell with a laser and rotating the ring with electromagnets. Each quadrant is pulsed with a square wave 90 deg apart.

Margoul has modulated a Ferrocell with his low frequency transmitter (RF) which is a form of EM.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...194?via%3Dihub

My new generation Ferrofluid mixture is sensitive enough to respond to very weak magnetic fields. This makes electromagnetic experiments much easier to do now. Thick glass is no longer a problem. A pencil wrapped with enameled wire should generate a strong enough field to see in these new cells.

[Markoul]

Margoul has modulated a Ferrocell with his low frequency transmitter (RF) which is a form of EM.

That's right, although ferrofluid does not respond to electric fields since it is an electric current insulator.

However, under a very strong electric field it can be ionized and an ion current can flow. On the surface of the ferrocell my pulsing electric field from the RF antenna rod (telescopic antenna) was 450KV/m therefore the ferrocell in my experiment was showing besides the magnetic field also ion current flow at the Bloch region (black strip) of the field thus it was showing the EM field and not just the magnetic field part of the the transmitted radio signal.

EM inside an antenna rod or for that matter any electric cable is essentially a coaxial field. On the video of my experiment below you observe the magnetic field (red halo) of the antenna rod with its Bloch region (black strip at the middle) in a small segment of the antenna rod. In reality the field is extending all the way along the length of the antenna rod conductor. Ion current produced is the ripple effect observed on the dielectric plane of the the field namely the Bloch region (black strip):

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGcvh4Rb0G4[/VIDEO]

https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...04885317319194

EM

p.s. The radio signal feed into the antenna is a RF pulsing field (On-Off). My next phase of research was to use a professional high-speed camera (60,000 fps) to record the on-off transitions of the field. They are there but you can not see them because the frequency is too high for the eye to catch so you see a constant red halo present. In reality this red halo switches rapidly on and off. Unfortunately, the camera costs about 50,000 US dollars and I am not under a grand or other founding and can not purchase it. So my investigation has stopped on that matter.

[Markoul]

Brian showing complete torus field of combined cube with ring magnet

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl3FMJyMf_M[/VIDEO]

Very genius what he has done here. The cube magnet on top of the ring magnet "sucks" out the inner field of the ring magnet but at the same time magnetically confines the outer ring field so it culrs before it reaches the LED strip and therefore we can see the complete torus field of both cube and outer ring combined on the ferrocell.

Excellent!

[Ufopolitics]

What do we use then...to replace electron with?

There is no such nonsense as electrons.


Tesla said it

Heaviside said it

Dollard said it.


"Mother nature is not a hooker on crack with a bag of bumping particles"- Myself

Hello Ken,

Ok, so there are no electrons...no photons...no ions...resuming, no particles whatsoever.

Sorry, I completely forgot your part of the Book..."The Electron Lie"

But then, please, could you answer what do we see in a Simple Black and White (not complicating it with RGB 3 Guns please) CRT Electron Beam, clearly shown as a Ray?



What are Particle Accelerators then?...Accelerators of what?

We can clearly see that whatever this beam is composed of...the main part is that it "REACTS" to Magnetism, showing magnetic spins directions pretty accurately...

And please, let's not complicate language with exotic wordings...but plain and simple, black and white descriptions...in order that We, simple and common beings could understand it.

And...am sorry, but just an "Aether Disturbance" is not a specific answer...too general.

Thanks in advance..


Regards


Ufopolitics

EDIT 1: We still have "electrons" as a negatively charged "entity" attached to ATOMS...Do Atoms exist in your opinion?
In water we have molecules formed by Three atoms...Two Hydrogen and One of Oxygen...bound at the end level by electrons in common...sorry, whatever "entities" are at the final orbits of the Oxygen.

In reality, to build a really efficient Water Pump...we do not need to know exact composition of water at atomic levels...but at Physical Experimenting like pressures reactions, compression levels as flow behavior etc,etc...

[Markoul]

Where the **** you have been?

Good to have you back my friend!!

EM