Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

about the Ferrocell (ferrolens)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fizzled out!

    The Ferrocell seems to have died out, yet again!
    I found this interesting.
    Grandchildren have toy trains that couple in any order.
    I was puzzled..
    See image, simple when you know how.
    !sketch-1541148833805.jpg

    John.
    Attached Files

    Comment


    • Wrong?

      SERF magnetometer achieves very high magnetic field sensitivity by monitoring a high density vapor of alkali metal atoms precessing in a near-zero magnetic field.[2] The sensitivity of SERF magnetometers improves upon traditional atomic magnetometers by eliminating the dominant cause of atomic spin decoherence caused by spin-exchange collisions among the alkali metal atoms. SERF magnetometers are among the most sensitive magnetic field sensors and in some cases exceed the performance of SQUID detectors of equivalent size. A small 1 cm3 volume glass cell containing potassium vapor has reported 1 fT/√Hz sensitivity and can theoretically become even more sensitive with larger volumes.[3] They are vector magnetometers capable of measuring all three components of the magnetic field simultaneously

      Comment


      • Question.

        Is there anybody out there??

        Comment


        • Originally posted by bistander View Post
          Maybe ferrocells are showing us ferroelectric behavior instead of ferromagnetic.

          https://www.sciencealert.com/hypothe...cle-discovered
          VIDEO 111 UNCOVERING SECRETS OF MAGNETISM
          VIDEO 112 UNCOVERING SECRETS OF MAGNETISM


          Al

          Comment


          • Eddy

            Hi Al,

            Eddy currents.



            You can clearly see how the magnetic field concentrates near the outer edge of the pole face of the magnet. The strong field induces more and stronger eddies in the moving brass. Near the center of the pole face the magnetic field diminishs and induces little eddies in the spinning brass.

            Regards,

            bi

            Comment


            • Originally posted by bistander View Post

              You can clearly see how the magnetic field concentrates near the outer edge of the pole face of the magnet.
              Monster magnet meets magnetic fluid


              Al

              Comment


              • Dictionary.

                There's no way I can see there being a vortex involved in
                the field perturbation caused by a permanent magnet.

                (in Cartesian philosophy) a rapid rotatory movement of cosmic matter about a center, regarded as accounting for the origin or phenomena of bodies or systems of bodies in space.

                The bodies in space appear to get angular momentum from gravitational means.
                For all intents and purposes, as far as I can see, a permanent magnet is a dead
                thing, just like a spring, any work done is put there by the hand of the experimenter.

                John.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Iamnuts View Post
                  There's no way I can see there being a vortex involved in
                  the field perturbation caused by a permanent magnet.

                  (in Cartesian philosophy) a rapid rotatory movement of cosmic matter about a center, regarded as accounting for the origin or phenomena of bodies or systems of bodies in space.

                  Graphic depiction of the magnetic field around a D82 disc magnet
                  Magnets Are Weird


                  Al

                  Comment


                  • What's the question?

                    The question is, does a Ferrocell show us a unique view of
                    magnetism?
                    After looking at available evidence I can't see anything to
                    indicate that it does.
                    In my view there is no vortex, a vortex is a dynamic thing
                    and of necessity that would show up as an energy source.
                    And as we well know, a permanent magnet isn't an energy
                    source.
                    Come on you guys out there, show me I'm wrong, I'd love
                    to be proved wrong.
                    John.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Iamnuts View Post
                      The question is, does a Ferrocell show us a unique view of
                      magnetism?
                      After looking at available evidence I can't see anything to
                      indicate that it does.
                      In my view there is no vortex, a vortex is a dynamic thing
                      and of necessity that would show up as an energy source.
                      And as we well know, a permanent magnet isn't an energy
                      source.
                      Come on you guys out there, show me I'm wrong, I'd love
                      to be proved wrong.
                      John.
                      https://magnetismtoroidaldynamics.com/
                      https://magnetismtoroidaldynamics.co...t-electricity/


                      Al

                      Comment


                      • Interesting quote

                        A quote from second link:

                        Noone has published any answers so far to what we observe when looking at a permanent magnet through ferrocell, its not understood. It doesnt show the magnetic field as we currently understand it:
                        bi

                        Comment


                        • Well guys, since we dont understand what can be observed in ferrocell, we should focus on the individual parameters present in the ferrocell.

                          Its up to us.
                          Ferrocell has permanent magnetism and light in one experiment. Without either of them, the effect cant be observed.

                          Therefore, its up to us to decide, whether we dont understand magnetism, or we dont understand light, or even the both of them

                          What i see:
                          -point geometric constructive destructive wave interferrence (wheter an effect of light or an effect of magnetism or the both remains to be proven)

                          -A toroidal point-symmetric pattern
                          - Nothing like we understand of electric nor magnetic field symmetry, yet its an effect of light+magnetism, whereas light is an EM-wave. So - do we understand EM fields?

                          -My conclusion, no we dont. If we would, we could explain the geometric pattern of a magnet under ferrocell.
                          Why do we think there is magnetism without electricity and electricity without magnetism and electromagnetism? Isnt it logic to think there is only electromagnetism, and what we think of isolated electricity and magnetism is simply an incomplete understanding of electromagnetism?

                          According to platonic retroduction, there can only be one thing in a unified theory.
                          Electromagnetism, which is fields of ether, opposed spinning/pulsing point-sourced waves that do something. To ask in general what something is should rather be what something does Waves do things, particles dont.
                          Last edited by Selfsimilarity; 11-07-2018, 06:53 PM.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by bistander View Post
                            A FULL quote from second link:
                            Noone has published any answers so far to what we observe when looking at a permanent magnet through ferrocell, its not understood. It doesnt show the magnetic field as we currently understand it:

                            The full magnetic field symmetry is only visible (illuminated), when energy such as photons (ferrocell) or electrons (CRT) are applied.

                            The ferrocell reveals the electromagnetic field to include permanent opposed spins and standing wave patterns!

                            Comment


                            • Faraday.

                              I didn't realise Faraday had got this far.


                              https://youtu.be/XhU-nNiAgtI

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Iamnuts View Post
                                I didn't realise Faraday had got this far.
                                https://youtu.be/XhU-nNiAgtI
                                MICHAEL FARADAY ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE AETHER, AND THE NATURE OF ACTION-AT-A-DISTANCE


                                Al

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X