about the Ferrocell (ferrolens)

[Markoul]

Extraordinary!!

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0vFWo4BLM8[/VIDEO]


Watch the nanoparticles chains get polarized from the magnetic field applied.

How the **** he did that!! He said magnifications is small!! Are you kidding me, these are 10 nanometers nanoparicles, chains must no be longer than 1-2 μm


Amazing!!

[dyetalon]

...

Watch the nanoparticles chains get polarized from the magnetic field applied.

How the **** he did that!! He said magnifications is small!! Are you kidding me, these are 10 nanometers nanoparicles, chains must no be longer than 1-2 μm


Amazing!!

Yes, it is.

When the field is applied, the particles begin to chain together and form double-helix's. This activity is what takes the cell a minute to form a display clearly.

Movement of the chains is provided by the Lorentz force creating a 'pull' toward one pole (I don't remember which N or S?). This is a 'twisy-torque' resulting from spin (I won't call it electron, just spin).

As the chains grow longer, their combined magnetism pushes the other chains away (like fields repel) and all of the chains are in magnetic equilibrium with each other.

What I have always found most interesting is the helical shapes the particles make when chaining. There's something important about it, but I just can't 'nail it'.

Here's something to think about:
We have iron moving thru a magnetic field.
What happens when you move iron thru a field?

You create potential differences, that's what !

Also, the helix's may be holographic and not really two chains twisted together.
Here's an image from a published paper on magnetite particle chains:



Their cuboctahedral shape may contribute to the appearance of double-chains but in reality, there are only 1 strand per chain ?

[Ufopolitics]

@Markoul

Markoul,

Thanks for your answers...it don't matter time involved.

The flow that I have shown is not the SPECIFIC way magnetism works...
You are right...there are not one single straight line in magnetism.

Shown flow is the adding (resultant) of all partial-angular spins, where each one has its centrifugal-centripetal cycles...as each one is enclosed within a perfect circle.

Only tool available We have so far, that indicates flow direction is the B&W CRT with a horizontal SCANLINE...that I have previously shown.

North & South are nothing but ONE SINGLE DIRECTIONAL SPIN...Therefore, both discharge to center plane in the opposite direction...a way Nature balances spins...and not "splashing" center plane in opposite directions...as you wrote.

You have mentioned many times the inner poles "entry points" or Inlets towards the center plane...and that is correct, it enters in opposite directions to pole spin...HOWEVER, have in mind that this takes place ONLY on the Higher Pressure layers...which go from pole to pole....and I know you do not believe in such flow.

Now, please give Us your logical explanation to....how could it be possible that Higher Strength Magnetism (which is perfectly measurable at each POLE) is based on RETURNING (INLET) FLOW and Not a STRONG MAGNETIC EXHAUSTING OUTPUT INTO SPACE?

Like I have cited before...the best comparison to this "dilemma" is a Hydraulic Pump example...understanding magnetism is a type of flow.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Looks like

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0vFWo4BLM8[/VIDEO]


Watch the nanoparticles chains get polarized from the magnetic field applied.

How the **** he did that!! He said magnifications is small!! Are you kidding me, these are 10 nanometers nanoparicles, chains must no be longer than 1-2 μm


Amazing!!

.

Yep, pretty cool. Sorta looks like a bunch of compass needles.

Thanks for the link.

bi

[Markoul]

Final Proof

Yes, it is.

When the field is applied, the particles begin to chain together and form double-helix's. This activity is what takes the cell a minute to form a display clearly.

Movement of the chains is provided by the Lorentz force creating a 'pull' toward one pole (I don't remember which N or S?). This is a 'twisy-torque' resulting from spin (I won't call it electron, just spin).

As the chains grow longer, their combined magnetism pushes the other chains away (like fields repel) and all of the chains are in magnetic equilibrium with each other.

What I have always found most interesting is the helical shapes the particles make when chaining. There's something important about it, but I just can't 'nail it'.

Here's something to think about:
We have iron moving thru a magnetic field.
What happens when you move iron thru a field?

You create potential differences, that's what !

Also, the helix's may be holographic and not really two chains twisted together.
Here's an image from a published paper on magnetite particle chains:



Their cuboctahedral shape may contribute to the appearance of double-chains but in reality, there are only 1 strand per chain ?

Timm,

Watch here at that point of the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0vFWo4BLM8&t=123s

When he repositioned the magnet so that light could freely hit the microscope slide at the exact moment the field was induced and chains got polarized they turn into full reflection mode and became ****ing bright!!

This is the proof i was seeking, the light lines we see on the glass surface of the ferrocell are generated by the reflective polarized nanoparticle chains and the lines of light of the glass surface coincide spatially with the chains beneath inside the thin film!!

Case closed, the image we see in the ferrocell is not some kind of light interference phenomena or effect but 100% produced and controlled accordingly by the induced external magnetic field.

This is for some here in this thread telling that ferrocell is not showing the magnetic field of a magnet but is just some play of light.

No. Lines of light shown by the ferrocell are coinciding 100% with magnetic lines. Period.

As Mike said in his video:

"The polarized nano chains are creating a light defraction grid"

It is amazing!

You could not get this with the electro microscope but you got it with an optical microscope!!

same picture but with a electron microscope:




Mike is certainly reading this thread here! not even a day passed that i have proposed the microscope experiment.

Thank You Mike!




EM

[Markoul]

Movement of the chains is provided by the Lorentz force creating a 'pull' toward one pole (I don't remember which N or S?). This is a 'twisy-torque' resulting from spin (I won't call it electron, just spin).

Timm,

That is not possible everything in the ferrofluid is dielectric, insulator to electricity. Therefore there can not be any Lorentz Force. Only when highly ionized but there is no such strong electric field present. It is just magnetism.

[Markoul]

Markoul,

Thanks for your answers...it don't matter time involved.

The flow that I have shown is not the SPECIFIC way magnetism works...
You are right...there are not one single straight line in magnetism.

Shown flow is the adding (resultant) of all partial-angular spins, where each one has its centrifugal-centripetal cycles...as each one is enclosed within a perfect circle.

Only tool available We have so far, that indicates flow direction is the B&W CRT with a horizontal SCANLINE...that I have previously shown.

North & South are nothing but ONE SINGLE DIRECTIONAL SPIN...Therefore, both discharge to center plane in the opposite direction...a way Nature balances spins...and not "splashing" center plane in opposite directions...as you wrote.

You have mentioned many times the inner poles "entry points" or Inlets towards the center plane...and that is correct, it enters in opposite directions to pole spin...HOWEVER, have in mind that this takes place ONLY on the Higher Pressure layers...which go from pole to pole....and I know you do not believe in such flow.

Now, please give Us your logical explanation to....how could it be possible that Higher Strength Magnetism (which is perfectly measurable at each POLE) is based on RETURNING (INLET) FLOW and Not a STRONG MAGNETIC EXHAUSTING OUTPUT INTO SPACE?

Like I have cited before...the best comparison to this "dilemma" is a Hydraulic Pump example...understanding magnetism is a type of flow.


Regards

Ufopolitics,

I believe what is the cause of disagreement we have here:

<== | ==> (you) , <== -- ==> (me)

The line in the middle between the arrows is the Bloch axis.

Regards,

EM

[itzon]

Markoul,

Like I have cited before...the best comparison to this "dilemma" is a Hydraulic Pump example...understanding magnetism is a type of flow.


Regards


Ufopolitics

I couldn't agree more, but the pumps inlets are facing, or is, the poles. The exhaust is the outer periphery of the pumps housings.

Magnetic flux field flows quite readily through a lot of materials like the palm of your hand, a sheet of wood or plastic, but not so much for a sheet of steel, iron or other ferromagnetic substance. Since we know magnetic flux doesn't flow through ferromagnetic materials all that well, it sure appears that they are being sucked into the pole of the magnet and that is the direction of flow. If the flow was the other direction we would see some kind of attraction at the Bloch region I would guess.

The only example I can think of that demonstrates anything coming out of the pole of a magnet is a piece of diamagnetic material such as pyrolytic graphite. But that reaction is very weak compared to the field of the magnet.

This might sound too simplistic, but I think the flow is that simple.

[Markoul]

itzon,

Interesting...

[TheoriaApophasis]

I couldn't agree more.

All you peeps dont realize that magnetism is just the 'dielectric field'

To think magnetism is something autonomous is as dumb as thinking water is one thing and ice is another, and steam another again.


1. magnetic attraction doesnt exist, thats not magnetism
2. a magnet isnt emitting anything,
...“There is no energy in matter other than that received from its environment (as meant the Ether).” – Nikola Tesla


Center of ALL magnetic fields there is no magnetism, center of gravity there is no gravity. Retroductive logic necessitates that there is ONLY ONE FIELD, the dielectric, since magnetism is the dielectric field being express in force of loss of inertia, and electricity is the construct of magnetism and dielectricity working in unison to create a self-reproducing energy construct which propagates, and gravity is merely incoherent dielectric acceleration, or point non-specific mutual mass acceleration towards counterspace.


People are confused as to why a more powerful magnet has a SMALLER spatial footprint of influence!
This is due to the fact that a magnet is FAR FAR LESS a MAGNET as implied a MAGNETISM OBJECT than it is a DIELECTRIC DOUBLE VORTEX magneto-dielectric field conjugate system with both field incommensurability but also field coherency.

A more POWERFUL “magnet” is a far more powerful COUNTERSPATIAL dielectric HYPERBOLIOID geometry which sits over either pole. Typically a N35 GAUSS magnet has a large spatial (IE MAGNETIC!) field, and as you increase the power of the magnet to N40, N50 it becomes much smaller, and ultra high power permanent magnets rated at N55 and higher have much smaller spatially palpable magnetic fields.

ALL POWER in a “magnet” is translational UPON and TO the dielectric, …not to magnetism

[bistander]

Magnetic field analogy

...
Magnetic flux field flows quite readily through a lot of materials like the palm of your hand, a sheet of wood or plastic, but not so much for a sheet of steel, iron or other ferromagnetic substance. ...

Hi itzon,

The relative permeability of steel is about 4000. That means, for equal volumes, steel will have 4000 times less reluctance than air, or the palm of your hand.

And there is no flow associated with magnetic flux. It is a field, like gravity. That is a problem associated with using hydraulic analogies. The magnetic field is like a football or soccer field. Nothing going on until the teams occupy it and the game begins. After the game is over, or the work has been done, the field remains. All the work, energy, motion, mass were brought into, or onto, the field. The field just provided a "place" for the event.

That's the way it is.

Regards,

bi

[dyetalon]

...

You could not get this with the electro microscope but you got it with an optical microscope!!

same picture but with a electron microscope:



...
EM

Actually that green image was made with an optical microscope. A friend and research partner of mine did that with a 4000x darkfield setup back in 2008, shortly before he died. I'm the one who tinted it green in Photoshop to enhance the contrast. That pix is all over the internet by now.

[TheoriaApophasis]

It is a field, like gravity.
bi

meaningless statement

NO branch of "science" (read mathematician slime) EVER defined a field itself
EVER, period,


Gravity is not a unique or stand-alone or "diff kinda" field itself.

[dyetalon]

Timm,

That is not possible everything in the ferrofluid is dielectric, insulator to electricity. Therefore there can not be any Lorentz Force. Only when highly ionized but there is no such strong electric field present. It is just magnetism.

I think the particle chains create potential while the field is present. They are moving streams of ferrous metal, and the Lorentz force will apply.
I haven't found a reliable way to measure this activity (only visually), but I do keep thinking of other ways to detect it. Any ideas?

Notice in Mikes movie how the chains align with the field orientation, but they are drifting in one direction together. Like a school of fish caught in the currents. I relate this to Lorentz.

It's the 'twist'


But hey, it wouldn't be the first time I was wrong...its only a theory.

[dyetalon]

Markoul,

Thanks for your answers...it don't matter time involved.

The flow that I have shown is not the SPECIFIC way magnetism works...
You are right...there are not one single straight line in magnetism.

Shown flow is the adding (resultant) of all partial-angular spins, where each one has its centrifugal-centripetal cycles...as each one is enclosed within a perfect circle.

Only tool available We have so far, that indicates flow direction is the B&W CRT with a horizontal SCANLINE...that I have previously shown.

North & South are nothing but ONE SINGLE DIRECTIONAL SPIN...Therefore, both discharge to center plane in the opposite direction...a way Nature balances spins...and not "splashing" center plane in opposite directions...as you wrote.

You have mentioned many times the inner poles "entry points" or Inlets towards the center plane...and that is correct, it enters in opposite directions to pole spin...HOWEVER, have in mind that this takes place ONLY on the Higher Pressure layers...which go from pole to pole....and I know you do not believe in such flow.

Now, please give Us your logical explanation to....how could it be possible that Higher Strength Magnetism (which is perfectly measurable at each POLE) is based on RETURNING (INLET) FLOW and Not a STRONG MAGNETIC EXHAUSTING OUTPUT INTO SPACE?

Like I have cited before...the best comparison to this "dilemma" is a Hydraulic Pump example...understanding magnetism is a type of flow.


Regards


Ufopolitics

You've made some good points.

I don't see it as 'in' or 'out', but more chiral or handed-ness that gives the appearance of in/out.