about the Ferrocell (ferrolens)

[dyetalon]

Thanks for the advice Bi Will follow it. But generally, as Brian showed, any wire should be usable.

This is a great experiment.

Save yourself a lot of time and money-

remove the voice coil from an old speaker (preferably one rated over 50 W).
A razorblade will help.
You can even power it with an audio amplifier. Download an tone generator app for your phone and use it as an input signal. Home speakers are generally 8 ohm and auto speakers are usually 4 ohm. You will produce a magnetic field, but using a sine wave won't heat up the wire as quickly as pure DC.

[Selfsimilarity]

Perfect tip tim, will do Ill surley find some old speaker lying around

[Markoul]

I don't believe a 50W 8 Ohms (I = 2.5 Amps) voice coil will produce any effect on a ferrocell even if it has 3000 turns which I doubt.

[Markoul]

There are no particles. All matter being manifestations of standing waves

Dear All,

Here is the person who confirmed the de Broglie waves (modification) explaining matter!

Dr. Milo Wolff mathematical physicists.


Explaining Dr. Milo's work about all matter being manifestations of standing waves:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BTcmuGdLCU




Dr. Milo Wolff Connecting de Broglie waves with Special Relativity
(The man who discovered the spherical standing wave model of mass in space. Discovery of the Wave Structure of Matter (WSM))



Milo Wolff :
Dr Milo Wolff: Sagnac Award 2010, Natural Philosophy Alliance (NPA). WSM Physics.
(video) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zU3UUwSHp-Y
(full interview with Milo) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRv6WYWyOYA



(biography) https://www.spaceandmotion.com/Wolff-Biography.htm

https://www.amazon.com/Schroedingers.../dp/1432719793

Article: https://www.spaceandmotion.com/Wolff...ure-Matter.htm


EM

[Iamnuts]

Problem 4 2day.

Were Patroclus and Achilles lovers?

[Selfsimilarity]

Guys,

Check this out Ferrocell on repulsion setup
and a brand new NASA Goddard computer simulation of two equally spinning black holes (equally spinning, just like in two equal magnetic pole repulse).

Notice any pattern similarities?

https://www.google.ch/search?biw=192...8et8WA95DA7OM:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2u-7LMhwvE

[Markoul]

Yes another confirmation of the vortex nature of magnetism. Both vortices spin ccw therefore their waves clash at the middle and therefore repel. Also notice the third vortex forming in the middle the same as shown on the ferrocell strongly indicating that ferrocell is showing actual magnetism and not the ferromagnetic sensors like iron filings and normal commercial magnetometers. The black hole in the middle is the center of repulsion, there were the maximum flux clashing occurs.

The magentic field terminates at the black holes. After that the vertical dielectric field flows which is actually the centripetal magnetic flux of the vortices inside the pole centers. The iron filings actually believe it or NOT show not the magnetic field of a magnet but its (d)ielectric field, net suction force flow of a magnet at its poles which vertical to the magnetic vortices planes.

CFMF ⊥ CPMF = M ⊥ E



EM or better MΣ (cryptic message )

[Markoul]

As a side note to the above, when vortices have counter rotation (one CW and the other CCW), this results to attraction and the dielectric plane is formed holding (but not merging) the two vortices together.



EM

[Selfsimilarity]

Exactely Markoul,

As can be seen with Brians experiment using the coil.
When coil and ring magnet in the middle attract, due to opposite spin direction, they become like one, connecting one with the other.

The field extends/connect from ring magnet all the way out to the coil, just like your example of the two pool vortecies shows equivalently.




Just imagine the impact of humanity having an incorrect understanding of the magnetic field. Due to the fact that ferrocell shows a different symmetry for the magnetic field, our understanding of electric fields and electric potential which is ultimately linked to magnetic fields will be enormously affected by this finding as well.
Everything we know will be impacted by this finding - All of our modern technology, believe & understanding. You feel it Timm? Your invention is of Nikola Tesla like importance <3

A friend of mine linked me a very nice webpage of standing waves being accounted to electrons. Maybe CERN should focus on understanding the electron and its associated standing-wave behaviour rather than trying to explain everything with particles, completely lacking energy understanding.
Have a look, I really liked it!

Matter is made of waves

[Markoul]

Very nice, this is actually also explained in this video:

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BTcmuGdLCU[/VIDEO]


Only one objection, these standing waves are made from vortices.

It is the only mechanism which can produce inward and outward waves at the same time when there are no boundary conditions.

EM

[Selfsimilarity]

Well, the toroid can look like a vortex (centripetal, concentration towards center) OR like a sphere (centrifugal, expansion from center). For standing waves, centrifugal and centripetal CW&CCW would need to be in balance.

Ken would say: A point-sourced energy structure, in toroidal&hypertrochoidial balance, of di-electro&magnetic nature

EM, how do bounderys work on fractals?
A fractal is quantized (specified), yet has infinite information at every spot.

I think Nature's fractal is the mandelbrot
The heart shape can be observed so often in light phenomena



I imagine nature as Bubbles, and vortecies - like soap bubbles, sharing surfaces, overlapping forming hexagons etc. Just imagine the bubble to be an standing wave toroidal energy. For energy, she spirals, like vortecies, two opposed spins in equilibrium, and matter arranges like a bubble, on the centrifugal maxima, on the toroidal energy-sphere's aequator

Bubbles and vortecies ) Nature's Simplicity



Bubbles (of light/matter)



Light accumulates at centrifugal maxima, and is to todays physics directly connected to matter



Bubbles



Vortecies



And opposed spin equilibrium (permanent)



The hurricane follows that principle. Overall, it would fit into a sphere, with two opposed spins, centrifugal vs centripetal in a balance system (see gif, notice the opposed spin motion). One spin is stronger than the other one, therefore it moves, changes



imagine the sphere/toroid, with many vortecies going back into the center of origin



Look at cloud base structure. They look like many many mini tornados of various sizes and one main tornado, just like ferroliquid shows for magnetic fields, one spherical main structure, and many small pinecones/inverse vortecies coming out of it.

[Markoul]

SSML,

Yes of course, Dr. Milo Wolff was also talking about spherical standing waves. Sphere is the most space efficient shape and therefore natures's choice.

It's not like vortices on a water surface but more like vortices inside a medium like underwater whirlpools in water or tornadoes in air. The reversed folded hyperbola vortex is a torus. A vortex inside a 3D space filled with a medium will essentially form a toroid due to the 3D centrifugal flow.

Dr. Milo Wolff says that inward centripetal flow of standing spherical waves is due outward waves bouncing off to other mass waves therefore all mass matter waves in the Universe are interacting and there is no such thing like empty space, space IS THE MEDIUM THE AETHER!!. It's like a fish tank. Does the fish know about the water it is in?

However, Dr. Milo came to this mechanism because standing waves can not exist without a boundary conditions (i.e. something the outward waves can bounce off and come back as inward flow).

In my opinion this model is too chaotic and could not sustain a stable nature of mass and vibrations, too many variables. A self generated form of energy flow is needed to sustain a stable mass structure.

The only mechanism in nature which can generate standing waves without boundary conditions and sustain them is the vortex.

Therefore vibrations of the aether responsible for all matter and energy radiation in the universe must have the form of spherical vortices, I submit.

EM

[Markoul]

The Science of Vortex Rings - Vortex in a medium forms a torus

The Science of Vortex Rings - Vortex in a medium forms a torus

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjgACB7urOo[/VIDEO]

There is difference of a vortex on a 2D surface with a 3D vortex inside a medium like water or air for example.

These 3D vortices inside a medium always result to a toroid ring shape.

That is why magnetism shown on the ferrocell thus magnetic vortex inside the ferrofluid thin film of the ferrocell results to a torus.

Also vortex is the most efficient way of nature to transfer energy and mass inside a medium.

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OIzclGkqHY[/VIDEO]

EM

[Markoul]

MUST SEE!! Video for every serious magnetism researcher

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbMUB7usKPQ[/VIDEO]

[Iamnuts]

Frequency Staff

Staff: Mentor A static magnet does not have a frequency in the same way an object lying on the floor does not have a frequency (it does not oscillate). To have a frequency, you need some oscillation of the field - you can rotate the magnet, for example. The frequency will be the rotation frequency then.

Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/thread...magnet.697149/