about the Ferrocell (ferrolens)

[Selfsimilarity]

point-sourced Fractal electromagnetic field

Hey Markoul
Nice that you got fascinated by ferroliquid.

It seems to me that ferroliquid shows the fractal aspect of magnetism.
In your video above you can see that the closer the magnet to the ferroliquid, the more spikes you see, the further he moves it away, the less spikes there are. from 19.20min to 19.35min

The closer to the bloch wall, the more spikes.



When you use a super strong magnet, you can see that there is a cone forming on top of the larger size cone. A clear energy transition, with pattern repetition!



Pointsource polarization into a line (2D Blochwall) that can be further polarized into 3D magnetism (3D sphere/toroid).

[bistander]

Vortex or spin?? NOT

I don't see it.



Image from: https://www.bing.com/images/detail/s...im=0,1,2,3,4,6

[Selfsimilarity]

Vortex And Spin, there is no "or"

Combine image of ferrocell and image of ferrofluid. 1 sphere, two vortecies, fractally breaking into smaller and smaller vortecies when approaching bloch wall.
Nature's standing wave is a point-oscillation. Like a breathing donout/toroid. Two opposed spinning wave. Two pulses. The vortex is included in toroidal symmetry.

[bistander]

Either or

Vortex And Spin, there is no "or"

OK. I do not see vortex and spin.

If neither is present, both are not present.

Point is: Why is there no vortex and spin in the ferrofluid patterns? I say it is because vortex and spin is not inherent to the static magnetic field resulting from a permanent magnet.

Regards

bi

[Iamnuts]

Hi Pascal,
do you consider the vortex to be rotational or irrotational?
I can't see how it's possible for a vortex to expand at C.
John.

[Iamnuts]

Photo.

Current Attachments (232.6 KB)
jpeg.gif 121DE846-2BDA-48F2-8B94-C61DB6A7263C.jpeg (232.6 KB)

[Selfsimilarity]

Hi Pascal,
do you consider the vortex to be rotational or irrotational?
I can't see how it's possible for a vortex to expand at C.
John.

Hey John,

Fair question! Well, I assume nothing is really static in the universe. What we assume to be static would be two opposed spinning rotations, resulting in a standing-wave like pattern that appears like a static object but its actually not.
How the spinning/pulsing toroid and light velocity c are connected I could not yet figure out. What Im certain of is that c is not the limit of nature. We have validated spooky action at a distance over and over again and this type of action is instantaneous over distance invalidating c as the limit of information transfer for nature dynamics

I imagine it like this: Think in terms of soap bubbles and how they optimally share surfaces (magnetic bloch walls) and interact with each other, now imagine soap bubbles to be electromagnetic "space"-bubbles/toroids.
The electromagnetic toroid is like the fundamental "sphere/space-bubble". Nassim Haramein would call them Planks-spheres. Spheres only exist, because they are connected to their geometric center point, which is a point-source dielectric energy potential. Many spheres create macroscopic, such as 4 spheres form a tetrahedronal pattern through optimal spacial sphere packing. A pulse between spheres is limited by c, but the sphere/toroid/space-bubble itself, which is an opposed spin/pulse-like oscillation to a center point is not limited by c

[Markoul]

Sure, SSML.

Dipole Magnetism is a nested double torus fractal field.

EM

[Markoul]

Hi Pascal,
do you consider the vortex to be rotational or irrotational?
I can't see how it's possible for a vortex to expand at C.
John.

Hi John,

It is the same like saying, you can not feel a tornado close to you but not upon you.

Think about it.

EM
p.s. magnetic vortices are irrotational

[Selfsimilarity]

Markoul, im not so sure if its not rotational.
Why else would a iron cylinder not produce a vortex in water when electrified but a neodymironboron permanent magnet does?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaMf1aq6Njg

The difference is the coherent spin present in atoms of permanent magnet. The coherency creates the scaling effect of the field. Every atom is most likely like an electrified permanent magnet, but as spins are non-coherent, the field rests on the size of the atom, only through spin alignment, the spin-field is scaled/amplified into macroscopic size as seen in video or tornado or spiral galaxy.

In a magnet, there must be always 2 spins, 2 opposed spins, one CW and one CCW in an equilibrium. Appearing static when equilibrated (standing wave), moving if non-equilibrated (superimposed waves of standing waves, doppler-effect). If one of the two spins is stronger than the other, it rotates. The larger the spin difference, the faster the motion. Every object in the universe has a dominant net spin of two spins, just like the earth turns clockwise, yet there is counterclockwise motion present at the same time, just in reduced amount in comparison to its main dominant clockwise motion.



Notice the two spins? How one is dominant, yet there is the weaker one present as well? One is "sucking"/aspirating/compressing, the other is radiating/expanding?
Like our breath or our heart, compression - expansion - compression - expansion -->how the toroid pulses. The wave would be from one breath to the next one, this pulse velocity is the frequency, scale through spin coherency is the standing wave's amplitude
Everything in nature works according to this opposed spin equilibrium

[Iamnuts]

Vortex

http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...1&d=1540026690

From Guava physics.

[Iamnuts]

Amazing

https://youtu.be/A1_3Xz6wfjw

This is for Markoul, simple little experiment... Enjoy!

John.

[Markoul]

cheers

[Markoul]

Agreed.

But all these vortices you show are irrotatioanal.

In a rotational vortex angular speed increases as you go further away from the vortex eye.

The period of circulation is therefore the same for every ring trajectory.

Also if the vortex on a magnet were rotational the inverse cube law with distance would not apply.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex

EM

[Markoul]

My ferrocell wih USB microscope

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAHWWInU2Aw&feature=youtu.be[/VIDEO]

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ideiT_SqvUQ&feature=youtu.be[/VIDEO]


EM