I recommend that you stick with evidence-based research, published in peer-reviewed journals. For instance, the work of Professors Harrit and Jones and Griffin. The explanation for the fine dust and many thousands of bone fragments is found in the use of explosives in the WTC buildings on 9/11, including thermitic materials.
Here are some references to peer-reviewed papers along with comments on those insightful papers:
1. Find the April 2009 published article at this link.
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/co...001/7TOCPJ.SGM
Deseret News article on the paper:
Traces of explosives in 9/11 dust, scientists say | Deseret News
Comment on the paper:
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe | 911Blogger.com
2.. First peer-reviewed paper to appear in a Civil Engineering journal:
Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction
Authors: Steven E. Jones, Frank M. Legge, Kevin R. Ryan, Anthony F. Szamboti, James R. Gourley
The Open Civil Engineering Journal, pp.35-40, Vol 2
http://www.bentham.org/open/tociej/a...2/35TOCIEJ.pdf
.DesNews article commenting on this paper: 9/11 theorist not curtailing his research | Deseret News
3. Another peer-reviewed paper in a mainstream, peer-reviewed journal (the Environmentalist): SpringerLink - The Environmentalist, Volume 29, Number 1
Dr. Jones on kutv2… YouTube - BYU prof on Utah TV discusses evidence of demolitions at WTC
Earlier scientific papers:
1. First major 9/11 paper (2006): http://journalof911studies.com/volum...ade_Center.pdf
2. Second major 9/11 paper (2007): http://journalof911studies.com/volum...1SciMethod.pdf
3. 3rd major paper, Jan. 2008 WTC Dust Study, iron-aluminum microspheres: http://journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp.pdf
Explosive Residues: Energetic Materials and the World Trade Center Destruction
Has a discussion of "nano-thermite 101" (in brief) and is well done. Should be readable by all IMO.
WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0GHVEKrhng - part I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtKLtUiww80 - part II
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vz43hcKYBm4 - part III
Here are some references to peer-reviewed papers along with comments on those insightful papers:
1. Find the April 2009 published article at this link.
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/co...001/7TOCPJ.SGM
Deseret News article on the paper:
Traces of explosives in 9/11 dust, scientists say | Deseret News
Comment on the paper:
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe | 911Blogger.com
2.. First peer-reviewed paper to appear in a Civil Engineering journal:
Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction
Authors: Steven E. Jones, Frank M. Legge, Kevin R. Ryan, Anthony F. Szamboti, James R. Gourley
The Open Civil Engineering Journal, pp.35-40, Vol 2
http://www.bentham.org/open/tociej/a...2/35TOCIEJ.pdf
.DesNews article commenting on this paper: 9/11 theorist not curtailing his research | Deseret News
3. Another peer-reviewed paper in a mainstream, peer-reviewed journal (the Environmentalist): SpringerLink - The Environmentalist, Volume 29, Number 1
Dr. Jones on kutv2… YouTube - BYU prof on Utah TV discusses evidence of demolitions at WTC
Earlier scientific papers:
1. First major 9/11 paper (2006): http://journalof911studies.com/volum...ade_Center.pdf
2. Second major 9/11 paper (2007): http://journalof911studies.com/volum...1SciMethod.pdf
3. 3rd major paper, Jan. 2008 WTC Dust Study, iron-aluminum microspheres: http://journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp.pdf
Explosive Residues: Energetic Materials and the World Trade Center Destruction
Has a discussion of "nano-thermite 101" (in brief) and is well done. Should be readable by all IMO.
WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0GHVEKrhng - part I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtKLtUiww80 - part II
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vz43hcKYBm4 - part III
Comment