Wikileaks Poll #1

[Mad Scientist]

This makes perfect sense if you’re goal is to teach the military to willingly attack the very people they are suppose to be protecting.
Of course what they don’t tell these military guys is that when their tour of duty is over and they get out of the military they now are the ones who will be considered terrorists. How can anyone that has had military training be trusted? They obviously know military tactics and weapons therefore they are a danger. But that is OK because they are now training the boy scouts to defend us against disgruntled veterans.

It just gets sicker and sicker.

[noises]

This is for the 180 people who have read the thread but haven't voted. In spite of there being an option that says you're undecided.


YouTube - Pt. 2/10 - What You've Been Missing - Ep. 1 - Exposing The Noble Lie - WYBM

(Language warning, contains quite a bit of swearing around the middle.)

Use your brains, think, form an opinion of your own, it won't kill you.

[future pather]

Do you think people are more likely to vote if you berate them lol?

There's also the possibility that people who have already voted are going back to the thread to see the current poll results. And I'm sure there are plenty of people who read stuff here at the forum but never log in and/or post. . .

[Mad Scientist]

(Language warning, contains quite a bit of swearing around the middle.)

Use your brains, think, form an opinion of your own, it won't kill you.

Carlan got it right, he actually understood what was going on. Although his language might be a little rough, but I think for the dumbed down, drugged down, and fluoridated masses that’s what it takes to get them to respond .... If things are too intellectual they will glaze over and go back to sleep.

[ImBill]

Do you think people are more likely to vote if you berate them lol?

Exactly?

There's also the possibility that people who have already voted are going back to the thread to see the current poll results. And I'm sure there are plenty of people who read stuff here at the forum but never log in and/or post. . .

I haven't voted because I really don't see the point. What is going to change because of this poll? What is the purpose of the poll? I would guess it would be twofold. One would be to provide a view of how posters here feel about the situation. Second would be to provide information about the subject so that those who aren't as informed about the situation might be able to learn more about it. If it was just a poll, there would only really be one purpose. What can we learn by people making tick marks on a web page? That the majority of a minority feel one way or another about a certain issue?

I'm ambivalent. While I strongly feel that all of the world's governments should be open, transparent, truthful, and full of checks and balances, I don't have enough information to make a decision regarding Julian and his actions. I can see where this might possibly be a catalyst to get people to wake up and demand transparency from their respective governments. However, ultimately it will be up to those in government to decide whether our demands will be met or not. So while I will hope for change and will encourage change in discussions with others on the subject, I don't really feel like I need to find out any more information about Julian. I don't care if he's a friend, I don't care if he's a foe, and I don't care enough about the poll to vote (hopefully it's not mandatory for continued permission to post ). For those of you who enjoy polls like this, I encourage you to participate. Much joy and love to you all!