Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

California Courts Served - "Collusion", "RICO", Conflict of Interest, Fraud!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • California Courts Served - "Collusion", "RICO", Conflict of Interest, Fraud!

    Its one big happy family at the top.

    There is no such thing as "branches" of government. There is only sub divisions of the united states, no different than personal, marketing, manufacturing, accounting, purchasing ceo and board(s) of directors etc etc of any other company. none

    They got this one bang on target!


    Courts in California get served


    On October 25, 2011, In Foreclosures, Fraud, Stop Foreclosure, By

    The Occupy Wall Street movement has served the courts as seen by this California demonstration on YouTube. What they have demanded is Federal and State of California Judges Recuse themselves on cases involving banks because they have a vested conflict of interest with their retirement fund invested in banks and Mortgage Backed Securities in Fannie [...]
    Share and Enjoy:


    Superior Courts of Los Angeles Served!!!


    The Occupy Wall Street movement has served the courts as seen by this California demonstration on YouTube. What they have demanded is Federal and State of California Judges Recuse themselves on cases involving banks because they have a vested conflict of interest with their retirement fund invested in banks and Mortgage Backed Securities in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, etc.


    Banks as servicers, not even the owner of the notes, have been getting away with judges ruling in their favor by dismissing cases without having the banks prove they even have a claim to a mortgage. Servicers file fraudulent Robo Signed documents and these federal and state judges don’t even allow homeowners to get to a trial and have discovery. I hope this sends a message that judges hear how there lives are tied to the success of the banks and that will certainly impair there judgements.


    When Attorney general are working out a 20 billion dolor settlement for improper filing of recorded documents but home owner that sue for the same thing get dismissed with prejudice there is something very broken with the courts. We at the foreclosure Legal Rights Commend Occupy Wall Street to standing up and being heard by the citizens of the United States of America. They get a big Thumbs Up!!!!!

    Occupy Wall Street Serves Courts in California and Washington | Foreclosure Legal Rights



    and that is only the tip of the iceburg!




    Judicial Racketeering RICO ACT on www.fulldisclosure.net - YouTube


    Judicial Racketeering Prompts Call For RICO ACT Prosecutions
    Internet Exclusive Video News Blog: 7:45 min
    Release Date: August 29, 2011

    Los Angeles, CA Former U. S. Prosecutor Richard I. Fine, Ph.D. appears in this exclusive video report where he outlines the criminal activity where members of the California Judiciary, are involved. He says this activity qualifies as "organized crime" and explains why their activities should qualify for prosecution under the RICO ACT ( Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act). Read Transcript Here

    Rico Act
    According to Wikipedia the RICO ACT is a United States Federal Law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. The RICO Act focuses specifically on racketeering, and it allows for the leaders of a syndicate to be tried for the crimes which they ordered others to do or assisted them, closing a perceived loophole that allowed someone who told a man to, for example, murder, to be exempt from the trial because they did not actually do it.

    Judicial Crimes
    Richard Fine described each of offenses involving 90% of California Judges among them are:

    Repeatedly taking illegal payments from parties appearing before them
    Denial of Due Process by failure to disclose those payments to litigants
    Obstruction of Justice
    Misprison of Felony
    Extrinsic Fraud

    Responsibility For Disclosure
    During the video Richard Fine reveals who are the officials responsible for informing litigants of the illegal payments received by parties who are involved in the case. He says the JUDGE and the COUNTY COUNSEL have an obligation to disclose the illegal payments (to all litigants, civil and criminal and their attorneys).
Working...
X