Tweet
A Path Beyond Radionics
Part 1
From:
Eastern Washington
Aaron Murakami
Saturday, June 07, 2008, 10:43 a.m.
Dear Friends,
Many people wonder if PATHS[1] is radionics. PATHS is not radionics. That is the short answer so let’s explore the longer answer as to why.
Radionics as we know it today originated from Albert Abrams[2] in the early 1900’s. Today, the most popular type of radionics device for diagnosing or treating utilizes a rub pad and dials with different digits. The digits can be put together to form numbers, which correspond to different ailments or treatments.
The practitioner focuses on the “patient.” He or she then rubs their fingertips across a “rub pad” that is rubbery. While asking different questions in mind, a yes answer is made known when the fingertip(s) perspire enough to cause the fingers to stick to the pad and stop sliding. This is made possible because of a reaction from the ideomotor effect[3].
The nervous system first responds to stimulus from the collective when picked up from the subconscious mind and that in turn triggers the events to cause perspiration at the fingertip in order for the practitioner to know the answer.
For example, one hand can be slowly turning a dial while the other hand is rubbing the pad. When the fingers stick to the pad, the number is recorded. This is one of many variations of operation. This is repeated for however many numbers are desired and that number will correspond to a pre-existing list of numbers where each one equals an ailment. Therefore, the ailment of a person can be known by this method.
In the 1930’s, Dr. Ruth Drown, supposedly involved with the Philadelphia Experiment, extended radionics by showing the diagnosis and treatment could be done at a distance through the aether[4] as well as having many other innovations in radionics.
A full model of synchronicity[5] showing and explaining the simple connection between the collective, subconscious mind and the conscious thinking mind is recommended for furthering your understanding of this concept.
This is really a bare-bones explanation of radionics but suits the purpose of showing a comparison of radionics to PATHS. There are plenty of free resources and references available on the Internet.
The radionics concept basically boils down to this: Each person, place, thing, treatment or any other thing you can imagine has an associated rate or frequency associated with it.
If a person has a headache, then there is a frequency that is supposed to be a treatment for headaches and there would be multiple different frequencies corresponding to the many different types of headaches. The radionics practitioners can use a machine, piece of paper or other modality to join this treatment frequency together with the person’s personal information or “witness” such as their blood, saliva, hair sample or other item from them.
The idea is that through the innate intelligence of the collective, it is known that the treatment is intended for that particular person. That person’s energetic self will pick up on the treatment frequency. It is known in the collective what that frequency corresponds to and therefore, they are supposed to experience the benefit of having their headache healed.
There are many radionic computer programs and systems that combine a person’s information together with a treatment. The treatment may work because of the principles of the effects of intention and the intention’s influence on the collective.
Tom Bearden has an incredible lecture called Radionics - Action at a Distance[6]. This video is the best explanation I have heard and it is technically deep. There is one part in his presentation of serious significance in regards to PATHS. Tom Bearden mentions it is a matter of time until we can put an entire PhD into someone’s consciousness. We’re still a ways off from this being a reality but it is my firm belief that it is undoubtedly the PATHS technology that is the precursor to this possibility because of the principles involved.
How effective is Radionics? There are as many people that swear by radionics as there are people who swear it is quackery. The concept of radionics is entirely in accordance with what we know today in regards to quantum physics regardless of what the debunkers want to believe. Nevertheless, the validity of a theory is a separate issue from effectiveness. Effectiveness has as much a part to do with the practitioner knowing what they’re doing as the methods alone.
There are however, quite a few radionics methods that are operator independent and have boosted the effectiveness as well as the credibility.
Again, the purpose of this letter is not give an in depth explanation of radionics but a general feel for the methods and principles involved.
All Action-at-a-Distance phenomena has been labeled as radionics by some people. PATHS does have an Action-at-a-Distance principle as part of its method but does not have anything in common with some of the above examples of radionics or any other principle that has been explained elsewhere. Also, be aware that PATHS’s Action-at-a-Distance principle is only one of three methods by which PATHS is communicated.
A distinction that I would like to make is that radionics is a subcategory of Action-at-a-Distance methods and is not the umbrella. PATHS is a totally different method under the umbrella of Action-at-a-Distance methodologies as it is a totally different method and technology that has only been discovered and understood by the developers of PATHS.
How does PATHS differ? Simply, it is a totally different principle that has never been utilized by any radionics technology or method. It is not an enhancement to known radionics principles, rates, or broadcast methods. It is not an offshoot of radionics. It is virtually impossible for any expert in radionics to comment on what PATHS is unless they themselves know the exact principle of the technology.
Various key principles involved with the PATHS technology was independently discovered and partially developed through Technical Remote Viewing[7].
In the next newsletter, part 2 of this letter will explain what makes PATHS different.
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami
p.s. To gain a deeper insight into how PATHS works, please read the article, “What’s so Quantum about PATHS?” You can find this by searching for it online or asking any PATHSÔ affiliate for it.
[1] PATHS – http://www.energeticforum.com/paths
[2] Abrams: An Appreciation, http://www.borderlands.com/Abrams.pdf
[3] Ideomotor Effect, http://www.indopedia.org/Ideomotor_effect.html
[4] The Quantum Key, Chapter 1, Aether, White Dragon Press | The Quantum Key | Aaron Murakami
[5] Murakami’s Model of Synchronicity – http://www.energeticforum.com/person....html#post6509
[6] Radionics – Action at a Distance, buy "Tom Talks Tesla" DVD
[7] Technical Remote Viewing, http://www.energeticforum.com/psychi...-sessions.html, http://www.energeticforum.com/psychi...ng-part-i.html
Part 1
From:
Eastern Washington
Aaron Murakami
Saturday, June 07, 2008, 10:43 a.m.
Dear Friends,
Many people wonder if PATHS[1] is radionics. PATHS is not radionics. That is the short answer so let’s explore the longer answer as to why.
Radionics as we know it today originated from Albert Abrams[2] in the early 1900’s. Today, the most popular type of radionics device for diagnosing or treating utilizes a rub pad and dials with different digits. The digits can be put together to form numbers, which correspond to different ailments or treatments.
The practitioner focuses on the “patient.” He or she then rubs their fingertips across a “rub pad” that is rubbery. While asking different questions in mind, a yes answer is made known when the fingertip(s) perspire enough to cause the fingers to stick to the pad and stop sliding. This is made possible because of a reaction from the ideomotor effect[3].
The nervous system first responds to stimulus from the collective when picked up from the subconscious mind and that in turn triggers the events to cause perspiration at the fingertip in order for the practitioner to know the answer.
For example, one hand can be slowly turning a dial while the other hand is rubbing the pad. When the fingers stick to the pad, the number is recorded. This is one of many variations of operation. This is repeated for however many numbers are desired and that number will correspond to a pre-existing list of numbers where each one equals an ailment. Therefore, the ailment of a person can be known by this method.
In the 1930’s, Dr. Ruth Drown, supposedly involved with the Philadelphia Experiment, extended radionics by showing the diagnosis and treatment could be done at a distance through the aether[4] as well as having many other innovations in radionics.
A full model of synchronicity[5] showing and explaining the simple connection between the collective, subconscious mind and the conscious thinking mind is recommended for furthering your understanding of this concept.
This is really a bare-bones explanation of radionics but suits the purpose of showing a comparison of radionics to PATHS. There are plenty of free resources and references available on the Internet.
The radionics concept basically boils down to this: Each person, place, thing, treatment or any other thing you can imagine has an associated rate or frequency associated with it.
If a person has a headache, then there is a frequency that is supposed to be a treatment for headaches and there would be multiple different frequencies corresponding to the many different types of headaches. The radionics practitioners can use a machine, piece of paper or other modality to join this treatment frequency together with the person’s personal information or “witness” such as their blood, saliva, hair sample or other item from them.
The idea is that through the innate intelligence of the collective, it is known that the treatment is intended for that particular person. That person’s energetic self will pick up on the treatment frequency. It is known in the collective what that frequency corresponds to and therefore, they are supposed to experience the benefit of having their headache healed.
There are many radionic computer programs and systems that combine a person’s information together with a treatment. The treatment may work because of the principles of the effects of intention and the intention’s influence on the collective.
Tom Bearden has an incredible lecture called Radionics - Action at a Distance[6]. This video is the best explanation I have heard and it is technically deep. There is one part in his presentation of serious significance in regards to PATHS. Tom Bearden mentions it is a matter of time until we can put an entire PhD into someone’s consciousness. We’re still a ways off from this being a reality but it is my firm belief that it is undoubtedly the PATHS technology that is the precursor to this possibility because of the principles involved.
How effective is Radionics? There are as many people that swear by radionics as there are people who swear it is quackery. The concept of radionics is entirely in accordance with what we know today in regards to quantum physics regardless of what the debunkers want to believe. Nevertheless, the validity of a theory is a separate issue from effectiveness. Effectiveness has as much a part to do with the practitioner knowing what they’re doing as the methods alone.
There are however, quite a few radionics methods that are operator independent and have boosted the effectiveness as well as the credibility.
Again, the purpose of this letter is not give an in depth explanation of radionics but a general feel for the methods and principles involved.
All Action-at-a-Distance phenomena has been labeled as radionics by some people. PATHS does have an Action-at-a-Distance principle as part of its method but does not have anything in common with some of the above examples of radionics or any other principle that has been explained elsewhere. Also, be aware that PATHS’s Action-at-a-Distance principle is only one of three methods by which PATHS is communicated.
A distinction that I would like to make is that radionics is a subcategory of Action-at-a-Distance methods and is not the umbrella. PATHS is a totally different method under the umbrella of Action-at-a-Distance methodologies as it is a totally different method and technology that has only been discovered and understood by the developers of PATHS.
How does PATHS differ? Simply, it is a totally different principle that has never been utilized by any radionics technology or method. It is not an enhancement to known radionics principles, rates, or broadcast methods. It is not an offshoot of radionics. It is virtually impossible for any expert in radionics to comment on what PATHS is unless they themselves know the exact principle of the technology.
Various key principles involved with the PATHS technology was independently discovered and partially developed through Technical Remote Viewing[7].
In the next newsletter, part 2 of this letter will explain what makes PATHS different.
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami
p.s. To gain a deeper insight into how PATHS works, please read the article, “What’s so Quantum about PATHS?” You can find this by searching for it online or asking any PATHSÔ affiliate for it.
[1] PATHS – http://www.energeticforum.com/paths
[2] Abrams: An Appreciation, http://www.borderlands.com/Abrams.pdf
[3] Ideomotor Effect, http://www.indopedia.org/Ideomotor_effect.html
[4] The Quantum Key, Chapter 1, Aether, White Dragon Press | The Quantum Key | Aaron Murakami
[5] Murakami’s Model of Synchronicity – http://www.energeticforum.com/person....html#post6509
[6] Radionics – Action at a Distance, buy "Tom Talks Tesla" DVD
[7] Technical Remote Viewing, http://www.energeticforum.com/psychi...-sessions.html, http://www.energeticforum.com/psychi...ng-part-i.html
Comment