I'm on the following four modules:
Successful Living Phase 1
Gratitude
Synchronicity
X Module
Synchronistically, I decided to read some of my old NLP books again to see if there was anything "new" in them for me. I found something really interesting.
Bandler explains, basically, that a lot of people are not experiencing true intimacy with others because they are wrapped up making internal pictures, hearing voices, and checking in with their feelings--and so they fail to notice any of the other person's nonverbal cues, and can be utterly surprised when the other person reacts in a way that is unexpected. He says that the meaning of a communication is the reaction it elicits.
Well I decided to test it, so I went out with a friend and focused on being the observer, rather than focusing on myself. I realized that he was having this very one-sided experience with me where he was enjoying himself tremendously and was unaware that I was a bit embarrassed for him. And he kept stating that he is confident, or this or that, and I wasn't buying it at all, because it was clearly incongruent with his nonverbal cues.
I know none of what I am saying here is groundbreaking stuff, and the material I'm re-reading is from 35 years ago...
I'm most curious how this intersects with PATHS.
1. What module is giving me the greater ability to understand what Bandler is talking about, and most importantly, to put it in practice?
2. Often the sequence of mental images, sounds, and feelings in the person who is lost in themselves is the same whether they're not being intimate, or they're depressed, or lack confidence. I'm wondering if PATHS is doing something to my internal sequence? I'm not sure it is changing yet, but I'm aware that it is there--what an eye opener.
Successful Living Phase 1
Gratitude
Synchronicity
X Module
Synchronistically, I decided to read some of my old NLP books again to see if there was anything "new" in them for me. I found something really interesting.
Bandler explains, basically, that a lot of people are not experiencing true intimacy with others because they are wrapped up making internal pictures, hearing voices, and checking in with their feelings--and so they fail to notice any of the other person's nonverbal cues, and can be utterly surprised when the other person reacts in a way that is unexpected. He says that the meaning of a communication is the reaction it elicits.
Well I decided to test it, so I went out with a friend and focused on being the observer, rather than focusing on myself. I realized that he was having this very one-sided experience with me where he was enjoying himself tremendously and was unaware that I was a bit embarrassed for him. And he kept stating that he is confident, or this or that, and I wasn't buying it at all, because it was clearly incongruent with his nonverbal cues.
I know none of what I am saying here is groundbreaking stuff, and the material I'm re-reading is from 35 years ago...
I'm most curious how this intersects with PATHS.
1. What module is giving me the greater ability to understand what Bandler is talking about, and most importantly, to put it in practice?
2. Often the sequence of mental images, sounds, and feelings in the person who is lost in themselves is the same whether they're not being intimate, or they're depressed, or lack confidence. I'm wondering if PATHS is doing something to my internal sequence? I'm not sure it is changing yet, but I'm aware that it is there--what an eye opener.
Comment