Tweet
Cleve Backsters, doesn't seem like a person who would make these things up. I have written to range of different people; trying to gain advice in the botany field. I agree, with Cleve Backster that plants may have rudimentary nervous system. He is not alone in this belief; Sir Jagadis C Bose, Darwin, many ancient Greek/Eastern philosophers share similar convictions (Cleve Backster bases some of his theories on.) Many of the published books by sir Jagadis C Bose; broadens Cleve Backster and if read with his work; giving his statements for scientific basis.
I have found some papers from Cleve Backster. That I felt was very amazing; some of the facts seem to parallel my interest in biocommunictions within plants. I was hoping, that you could suggest to me more research papers in this line of work; or other researchers that were paralleling Cleve's work.
The only material that I have found is:
"Implications of the Backster effect”
By Thomas Valone Phd
Integrity Research institute
"Primary Perception"
By Cleve Backster
.
Cleve Backster's experiments, referring to the Baltimore Sunday sun Feb. 1973 "Do plants have feelings Too?" written by James Lincoln collier.
Gives an interesting fore thoughts; towards my spiritual beliefs relating to plant life.
Cleve Backster's book Primary Perception page 64 states.
“If plants demonstrate primary perception though either a rudimentary nervous system or though perturbations of a sensitive bioelectric field. This ability may characterize lower forms. Including the human species advances in the study of plants might lead to a greater understanding of telepath, clairvoance, precognition, and pschokinesis."
(My question, is relating to a possible function of the stereognosis pathway. Is it possible, that this pathway could be away to sense Biocommunications within plant life? Many ancient religions worship plant life; such as the cult of Demeter)
I have notice a strong connection with trees. The strongest signal; that I can feel though my hands. Comes from the roots of the tree and the middle part of the tree.
Which many researchers have pointed out that these areas are more sensitive part of the plant? (Dr. Monica Gagliano has report; that the roots of plants signal each other in a form of "tek" noises.)
When I attempt to make contact with a tree. I have to claim my central nervous system; direct it towards my hypothalamus/brain stem; and away from my fore-brain.
Which in areas rises my nor epinephrine levels. I have to change my motor pathways towards my stereognosis pathways. Then I can feel the energy of trees. (It feels kind of like static fuss on a TV screen but much weaker.) The feeling comes mostly in the roots of the plant. This isn't a magical statement; but I believe, it is an old human skill that is no longer taught.
(I have been researching and communicating with a range of different groups.)
I am working, on this topic as a hobby; I am also working on a drought concept; that is relating to improve traditional organic techniques in the agriculture field; Developing root structures / balancing homeostasis of the organism of plants/crops after a drought. (I am looking for a response from someone that may have more information. Maybe the possible chance to develop my concept into a theory. Naming some of the main researcher work; that I have collected: jagadis c Bose, Cleve Backster, Alexander Badawy and range of other books and papers.)
I have found some papers from Cleve Backster. That I felt was very amazing; some of the facts seem to parallel my interest in biocommunictions within plants. I was hoping, that you could suggest to me more research papers in this line of work; or other researchers that were paralleling Cleve's work.
The only material that I have found is:
"Implications of the Backster effect”
By Thomas Valone Phd
Integrity Research institute
"Primary Perception"
By Cleve Backster
.
Cleve Backster's experiments, referring to the Baltimore Sunday sun Feb. 1973 "Do plants have feelings Too?" written by James Lincoln collier.
Gives an interesting fore thoughts; towards my spiritual beliefs relating to plant life.
Cleve Backster's book Primary Perception page 64 states.
“If plants demonstrate primary perception though either a rudimentary nervous system or though perturbations of a sensitive bioelectric field. This ability may characterize lower forms. Including the human species advances in the study of plants might lead to a greater understanding of telepath, clairvoance, precognition, and pschokinesis."
(My question, is relating to a possible function of the stereognosis pathway. Is it possible, that this pathway could be away to sense Biocommunications within plant life? Many ancient religions worship plant life; such as the cult of Demeter)
I have notice a strong connection with trees. The strongest signal; that I can feel though my hands. Comes from the roots of the tree and the middle part of the tree.
Which many researchers have pointed out that these areas are more sensitive part of the plant? (Dr. Monica Gagliano has report; that the roots of plants signal each other in a form of "tek" noises.)
When I attempt to make contact with a tree. I have to claim my central nervous system; direct it towards my hypothalamus/brain stem; and away from my fore-brain.
Which in areas rises my nor epinephrine levels. I have to change my motor pathways towards my stereognosis pathways. Then I can feel the energy of trees. (It feels kind of like static fuss on a TV screen but much weaker.) The feeling comes mostly in the roots of the plant. This isn't a magical statement; but I believe, it is an old human skill that is no longer taught.
(I have been researching and communicating with a range of different groups.)
I am working, on this topic as a hobby; I am also working on a drought concept; that is relating to improve traditional organic techniques in the agriculture field; Developing root structures / balancing homeostasis of the organism of plants/crops after a drought. (I am looking for a response from someone that may have more information. Maybe the possible chance to develop my concept into a theory. Naming some of the main researcher work; that I have collected: jagadis c Bose, Cleve Backster, Alexander Badawy and range of other books and papers.)
Comment