"As Above so Below"

[MonsieurM]

Going from the statement "As Above so Below":

If the sun was a nucleus of an atom what type of atom would the solar system be

I would really like your opinion on this

[MonsieurM]

no one wants to venture an answer

[ImBill]

Are you asking us to pretend that the sun is the nucleus of an atom and the planets are the 8 (or 9) electrons orbiting the nucleus? Are you asking us what kind of atom has 8 (or 9) electrons? What's the point? Are you suggesting that the macrocosm is the same as the microcosm so that our solar system is a giant atom with us living on one of the orbiting electrons? I suppose that's possible, but it doesn't seem to get us anywhere, or does it?

I'll throw out that we're a cobalt atom... I like cobalt.

[MonsieurM]

just go along with it, and we 'll see where it takes us...

If you like Cobalt, tell me, What do you know about cobalt? (i know i could look it up)

[MonsieurM]

Alchemical substances


Cobalt. Named by the copper miners of the Hartz Mountains after the evil spirits the 'kobolds' which gave a false copper ore.

funny the origin of the name of a scientific substance is so "unscientific"

Alchemical substances

Alchemical Symbols

now, how do you think we should go about comparing our solar system with cobalt (keep an open mind)

Next is the periodic table with the platonic solid added: (from http://www.energeticforum.com/new-me...dic-table.html )




molecule of Cobalt

[timh651]

just go along with it, and we 'll see where it takes us...

If you like Cobalt, tell me, What do you know about cobalt? (i know i could look it up)

I know cobalt warheads are a really nasty weapon. Even surpassing what's going on with Fukushima. No one has ever used one though.

[MonsieurM]

Here is a thought, if you look at the periodic table above, let's for instance consider the sun's position is Hydrogen in the table , where would be the other planets on the table and what element do they fall under



[IMG][/IMG]

[Nadda]

I've often thought about this question. it seems everything in life contains patterns and dualities, which makes sense. If there is one specific way in which something is most efficiently built why would that change elsewhere?

Why does the macro seem to mimic the micro? Maybe they have absolutly no relation at all. Perhaps (in this case) its just the most efficient form of a weak structure fighting gravity. It makes sense to me, a circular form would be the most efficient form to radiate energy evenly across all fields.

When your taking a bath or shower, cup your hands together fill them with water and throw it in the air. Watch closely...as gravity pulls the water back down, the mass will break apart and form a dozen balls of water.

everything in the macro is circular, why wouldnt everything in the micro be circular?

[MonsieurM]

As Above so Below is just another way of pointing us towards the idea of a Fractal Universe:

A fractal is "a rough or fragmented geometric shape that can be split into parts, each of which is (at least approximately) a reduced-size copy of the whole,

[MonsieurM]

This knowledge is not new as you will see:

The Law of Octaves was first suggested by Pythagoras in ancient Greece. Having observed that the eight notes of the conventional Occidental musical scale were governed by definite mathematical relationships, Pythagoras proceeded to create a whole cosmology based on 8s. In this octagonal model Pythagoras made numerous mistakes, because he was generalizing from insufficient data. However, his work was the first attempt in history to unify science, mathematics, art and mysticism into one comprehensible system and as such is still influential. Leary, Crowley and Buckminster Fuller have all described themselves as modern Pythagoreans....
... In the 1860s, English chemist John Newland showed that all the chemical elements fall into eight families. Since Pythagorean mysticism was unfashionable at that time, Newland was literally laughed at and rejected by the Royal Chemical Society. In the 1870s, with much more detail than Newland, the Russian chemist Mendeleyev proved once and for all that the elements do, indeed, fall into eight families. His Periodic Table of the Elements, an octave of hauntingly Pythagorean harmony, hangs in every high-school chemistry class today. (The Royal Society later apologized to Newland and gave him a Gold Medal.)

The Octave of Energy

[MonsieurM]

now, how do you think we should go about comparing our solar system with cobalt (keep an open mind)

[MonsieurM]

I'll start first:

Bohr model - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bohr model

In atomic physics, the Bohr model, introduced by Niels Bohr in 1913, depicts the atom as a small, positively charged nucleus surrounded by electrons that travel in circular orbits around the nucleus—similar in structure to the solar system, but with electrostatic forces providing attraction, rather than gravity.

Not so foolish after all

again,

now, how do you think we should go about comparing our solar system with cobalt

[MonsieurM]

I'll start first:

Bohr model - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bohr model

In atomic physics, the Bohr model, introduced by Niels Bohr in 1913, depicts the atom as a small, positively charged nucleus surrounded by electrons that travel in circular orbits around the nucleus—similar in structure to the solar system, but with electrostatic forces providing attraction, rather than gravity.

Not so foolish after all

again,

now, how do you think we should go about comparing our solar system with cobalt

[MonsieurM]

a 186 views and still no one wants to play along....

[jtanguay]

You need to watch this video...