Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

High RPM to Low RPM, Motor-Generator: Public Discolsure - The Real McCoy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Yes a video or some pictures would be nice. All the theory in the world proves nothing, it is no better the skeptics confidently claiming that it can’t possibly work.

    But a real live working model one that can be closely examined and reproduced by others well that’s something to talk about.

    So I have a simple yes or no question. Have you already built and tested an actual working model?

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Mad Scientist View Post
      Yes a video or some pictures would be nice. All the theory in the world proves nothing, it is no better the skeptics confidently claiming that it can’t possibly work.

      But a real live working model one that can be closely examined and reproduced by others well that’s something to talk about.

      So I have a simple yes or no question. Have you already built and tested an actual working model?
      Yes I have. And I am getting setup to film. But my idea of getting setup to film is not in two hours or by tomorrow... I am working on a timeline of two weeks to a month. As some of the skeptics on other forums have requested that I used multiple cameras, and get setup in a very specific way.

      Comment


      • #18
        Chas Campbell Free Energy Generator - YouTube
        Half of the Answer is knowing the right Question

        Comment


        • #19
          I have seen people power alternator with a dc motor, though it works but lasted for 8hrs or less. I have seen one that did it well, and could last for 24hrs, still with dc motor and alternator. one thing good about it is that it has amps, it can carry tv, it can carry video. If u people can conduct experiments based on this area, I'm sure u people will get the same results my young man did

          Comment


          • #20
            gen specs posted on ats board

            You could save us all a lot of time and effort by just telling everyone the exact brand and model number of the generator you gave specs for on the ats board since 1291 watts for every horsepower of input is already more than anyone here could ever want.

            "Also, the generator I provided specs on, produces, 1291 watts per horsepower, and again, these ratings are from an ISO 9000:1 certified manufacture."

            quoted from 2 thirds down the page at :

            High RPM to Low RPM, Motor-Generator: Public Discolsure - The Real McCoy, page 1

            I found this most amusing in a post that started with "lol. I like this part. This is where having a background in electrical engineering would help you all. Otherwise it's your Achilles heal."

            Garry

            Comment


            • #21
              I made a mistake in my calculations... none of this works... sorry guys. move on.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by bradagilah View Post
                I made a mistake in my calculations... none of this works... sorry guys. move on.
                Can you tell us where the mistake was in the calculation? Or how you made the mistake? I'm sure a lot of us would find that helpful. Hopefully no one in a black hat is standing next to you as you wrote the above
                Stew Art Media

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Joit View Post
                  one_christian_warrior, what you do discribe is not discovered, because usual the transmission from power is usual a 1:1 Ratio minus losses.
                  JOE- “what you do discribe is not discovered” ???
                  Originally posted by Joit View Post
                  One Question, your chair has a Motor in what charge the Batteries?
                  JOE- ? the late 80s Quickie P200 has 2 motors in the back,
                  JOE- these motors both movie the chair, and act as breaks, through electrical means
                  Originally posted by Joit View Post
                  I been thinking about your Story too, but i found a hook there. When you charge your Batteries with a second motor, when its in idle or downhill, then it happens with the Power from gravity and the weight with the Chair,
                  not with the Power from the Batterie alone or with a Flywheel, what drives only the Generator.
                  JOE-, “but i found a hook there” ?
                  JOE- “When you charge your Batteries with a second motor” there is no second motor
                  JOE- only the 2 motors that the chair has, when you slow it down on a down hill run
                  JOE- then there are electronic breaks, that actually recharge the chair (know fact)
                  Originally posted by Joit View Post
                  Its another Force, what you do need to add, when you want to calculate it, even when you need more Power to drive uphill. Not sure, how this comes out but mostly negative at the transmission factor.
                  JOE- ?
                  Originally posted by Joit View Post
                  For emailing the Gouvernment, i would not do that, mainly they are not interested, probatly speak with a Person there, what really wanna invest into a Idea, but else it is waste of Time. And even more wasted at higher Offices.
                  JOE- I agree with you here
                  JOE- what a waste of time this was
                  http://onechristianwarrior.yolasite.com/
                  http://my2020vision.yolasite.com/
                  http://beliefstoliveby.yolasite.com/
                  http://aliensandghosts.yolasite.com/
                  http://fire-starter.yolasite.com/
                  http://ultimatejoysticks.yolasite.com/
                  http://ultimatevideogamecontrols.yolasite.com/
                  http://decimationofthisevolutionfairytale.yolasite.com/
                  http://free-energy.yolasite.com/
                  http://myiqchallenge.yolasite.com/
                  http://evolutiondebate.yolasite.com/
                  http://evotutionfairytale.yolasite.com/

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    He made several mistakes. I explained in post #8 in this thread he mixed up 3 phase input power and output power. He claimed the motor data for horsepower was for a single phase. A motor is NOT rated that way. The rated output power is for all phases combined. Also his formula for input power was wrong. He was including the power correction factor in the input power formula. According to all sites I checked on calculating motor input power the power factor is not included in the input power calculations. He also did not include the motor efficiency in the output power of the motor. The correct formulas for a single phase motor are: Input power = V x I , for output power it is V x I x PF x Eff. He also made claims that a multiphase generator is rated for each phase which I am pretty sure is also incorrect although after seeing what a mess he made of the motor calculations I didn't bother to check.


                    Originally posted by jimboot View Post
                    Can you tell us where the mistake was in the calculation? Or how you made the mistake? I'm sure a lot of us would find that helpful. Hopefully no one in a black hat is standing next to you as you wrote the above
                    Respectfully,
                    Carroll
                    Just because someone disagrees with you does NOT make them your enemy. We can disagree without attacking someone.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Mad Scientist View Post
                      But a real live working model one that can be closely examined and reproduced by others well that’s something to talk about.

                      So I have a simple yes or no question. Have you already built and tested an actual working model?
                      Yes I have. And I am getting setup to film. But my idea of getting setup to film is not in two hours or by tomorrow...

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by one_christian_warrior View Post
                        JOE- “what you do discribe is not discovered” ???
                        JOE- ? the late 80s Quickie P200 has 2 motors in the back,
                        JOE- these motors both movie the chair, and act as breaks, through electrical means
                        JOE-, “but i found a hook there” ?
                        JOE- “When you charge your Batteries with a second motor” there is no second motor
                        JOE- only the 2 motors that the chair has, when you slow it down on a down hill run
                        JOE- then there are electronic breaks, that actually recharge the chair (know fact)
                        JOE- ?
                        JOE- I agree with you here
                        JOE- what a waste of time this was
                        Joe, its not discovered, or done, (maybe some did build something like that at a try, but not public) because usual when you think about it, you dont come to a positive Result.

                        The Force from Gravity, what drags a Weight down uphill is equal to the Force, what you win, when a Weight rolls downhill. Without thinking at other losses, what are in a System with bearings and transmissions.
                        If it would be otherwise, a Pendulum would swing faster and faster, when you set it in motion, because it should win Energy each time when it swings down.

                        Another Reason can be, that the Batteries are been sulfated, and with the higher Current from breaking, they did better charge up as they been.
                        Or even, that the charge system in the Breaks work better then the Charger on the Grid, like gives the Batteries better power.

                        But anyway, i dont know if its possible, the Watson motor runs with a heavy flywheel too, and few others do use one too. The Inventor from a DAF (Dutch Car) developed a Car with a big Flywheel and claimed, that it does not need any Fuel, but the Car itself came later of course with depending on Gas, but at last, it could drive backwards same fast as forward. Someone should rebuild it and play with it, but i guess any Technican just yawns about that.

                        But at last, there are more Factors, a Flywheel (what is a mechanical Capcitor), 2 Motors, a Voltage Regulator, (with Capacitors), and big Capacitors - the Batteries.
                        Last edited by Joit; 04-19-2012, 06:28 PM.
                        Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X