Positive Versus Negative Radiant Energy

[navigator]

Well somehow it is related, this is A/C though, a very High Voltage AC Field (2-3KW) creates this physical phenomena, it is heating and melting the aluminum by induction. Aluminum is non magnetic but it conducts electricity, therefore becomes magnetic due to electrons being transferred through the heavy AC magnetic field.

Same experiment in English...

induction heater levitation melting aluminum - YouTube


Cheers


Ufopolitics

The eddy currents induced in the aluminium create the magnetic field needed
for the magnetic field of the coil to levitate the aluminium block I think. The
eddy currents also do the heating I think.

A good example of why we want to reduce eddy current losses in our devices.

The aluminium block is levitated by magnetic levitation in my opinion.

Cheers

Thanks for the explanation guys and I find this a very interesting subject and disscusion.

[Ufopolitics]

Hello MBrownn

Your welcome

MBrownn, You are a very well educated Gentleman, I always have admired the way you approach in Forums and since the beginning of my first posts here when I first met you.
Thanks again!

I hear what you are saying but there are interactions between coils in a changing magnetic field that are complex, such as polarity reversal if the output is blocked one way by a diode. For now I think we need a scope on the little coil and to look at its waveform when it is held in one direction and then in the other to establish if it is this effect.

I agree with your proposal completely, and I will do that testing on the little coil, both directions. As a matter of fact when I first made that tool with the LED, I almost added a second LED but wired opposite to Blue one...and of course of other color...amber or red, however I thought it may bring confusion to viewers...In my little UFO video I used the same hook up for both LED's just because wanted to illuminate the floor with the red and people could see the different lighted areas.

I see what you are saying and its a logical conclusion. to be sure this needs to be investigated further.

Agree with you, it does needs to be investigated more, that is the reason I am exposing all my circuits and spec's in the Open Source Mode , so others could replicate and investigate on their own side.

If I understand you correctly, you are saying that the "current" produced magnetism is remaining at the same polarity although varying between zero and full, but there is a magnetism produced in the core of the large coil of the opposite polarity in the off time, or is it in the on time? And you attribute this to radiant flow?
It sort of makes sense to me but I would like to clarify that.

Yes!, exactly that way...there are at Least, (because I know there are more complex internal magnetic structured patterns) two fields, in every coil we excite, One is located at the extreme outer ends of our Coil and another one in the very center, and they interact-correlate their Norths and Souths lines of force with each others.. exactly the same way two or more magnets do when approached together.

Yes, what they do is Turn On in a "Push-Pull" fashion, One Up, the other Down, One On, the other Off, that keeps a Natural Magnetic Equilibrium of Forces...and it should be a Physical law for magnetism, that maybe someone writes in a future...like a Physical Law of the mechanical "Action-Reaction" of certain objects and equations.
At the beginning of my research, I thought the Radiant Field was coming from the exterior of the Coil...but further testing got me into this structure above, at least, it answers my doubts when observing some effects and responses.

Putting it simple...a Tennis Ball have certain properties based on the rubber that it is made off, to increase its "bouncing reaction" when is thrown against a solid wall...now, depending on certain parameters like the throwing force we apply, the Angle and direction, versus the positioning of the wall plane...we will obtain different results in its "natural reaction". The Curve of Reaction could be higher peaks and shorter distance than initial primary action...or the other way around. Now, if we "inject" that tennis ball with more pressurized air than "Factory Spec's" ...then the Reaction results will be magnified to a point it will look like the reaction was much "intense and robust" than its primary action that caused it...

I hope I did not complicated things more by putting this example...

But yes, both fields are always there, internal and external, and like I wrote before, could be simple links of just two N/S/N/S Fields, or more complex structured patterns that expand in different planes. They exist on Permanent Magnets and Electromagnets in general. Now, the action-reaction "Equation" in a permanent magnet is at its Rest, or "Stabilized Magnetic Field Forces" and so with a linear fed Coil, like the Stator of a Typical DC Motor...However, the Magnetic "Distortion" of the Fields starts when we excite one more than the other through our pulses.
I am certain there is a very wide Horizon of so many probabilities in this phenomena... like to be experimenting it for years and years ...that our classic Physics have either overlooked or forgotten, and has kept the simple and plain old approach-discoveries about Magnetic Domains and Dynamics... that date a few decades back...

An interesting experiment would be to put a neon in the core with one terminal wrapped around the neon and the other going to earth or somewhere on the circuit to see if it lights up.




This refers to what I said earlier about a coils ability to reverse itself.

The "reversal of Voltage polarity" on a given coil is due, not to a somehow "mystical or almost fictional property" that We all should religiously believe and abide while praying for others not to become heretics ...but, due to the same principle I described before...reversing its magnetic polarity of the Inner Field(s), and that takes place first, then, it changes voltage or potential difference. The "Magnetic Reaction" comes first, but we were forced to believe "primarily" in "a" consequence of the Main Reaction.

The question is, was the bulb open circuit as I described or did you have a return wire? Radiant does not need the return by its nature although it prefers one. This alone, if it works, is significant evidence of a radiant field.

Yes, completely agree, Radiant could be used with just "One Wire"...However, according to my tests, in order to do that, some set-up have to be arranged...I have achieved the one single touch by taking both terminals of Radiant to face each others through a Spark Gap...not igniting or sparking at all...just there...facing each others at 180 degrees. Then it seems the Air becomes saturated by a "Single Conductor"... and by just approaching, lets say a CFL Bulb to the area of the spark gap...or the Coil Core...it will light up very bright...I will be making that test video soon...and I also used Two Plasma Lamps to define both currents "Graphically" by the way they evolve inside the crystal balls through the plasma rays...it is a beautiful experiment.

Unfortunately my equipment ifs far inferior to yours

I am sorry to read that...
Over my years of work and research...I have learned that expensive equipment-tooling last longer, is more reliable and does not gets "upgraded" often, therefore "depreciated" faster , becoming obsolete and no parts availability in a very short time from acquisition date...like it happens with cheaper ones...So, on the long run, it pays back to acquire them. Same exact thing happens in many other fields, like Software...and Hardware...

I don't doubt you, but throwing out challenges etc does not help your cause and can antagonize some, try to chill a bit

MBrownn,

I really appreciate your kind approach and the very wise advice... based on my 'quoted previous info'...

However, Human response must of times does not follow a disciplined, well elaborated approach like for example Your person does...But instead "jump" to conclusions with very weak and poor judgement calls, with lack of grounds...and some events take place without even investing a few minutes of their time to look at your basic explanations and main claims...
I have observed very tense and critical arguments against someone just for disclosing or simply posting some thoughts or ideas about Radiant Energy...It really bothers me a lot!!...and I know I should not adopt certain rules to respond...or post, but, in the end...I am not here to fight with no one, to argue with no one...but to disclose my findings and that is it!!... I have no interest at all to become a Famous Character within this fields...Who the heck is Ufopolitics?...No one...just "some random guy" that came up from God knows where...but there He is.
I have also noticed the "Show Proof" approach..."Hey You, yes you!!...show some pictures, some videos...or You would be considered a Fake!"
HA, HA, HA...I really laugh at those approaches, poor insignificant bacteria!!

Then I adopt those answers, those approaches, and to be very deeply honest...I could NOT care less if I acquire antagonisms...I really don't...anyways, by just Disclosing about Radiant Energy...I will make "tons" of them...so my approach...is...Be My Guest!!...and then get some more...

You are clearly demonstrating something but we have to eliminate all the other possibilities and maybe a few that we haven't even thought of before anything is accepted. I have had my theories dashed before, sometimes justifiably and sometimes not, but when people point out a different possibility I try it and try to prove which one is correct.

Yes, thank you, I do and I will keep clearly demonstrating it...However I decided to start from the "Simple to the Complex"...like we all learn in school, and I have not even stepped out of the first grade of simplicity stage...

That is a very good, an excellent approach!!...I wish I could "at least one day" be like You MBrownn!!

See, there is just one thing, MBrownn...when you are completely sure of what you are talking and writing about...just because you have not just made up some conclusions in your analytic mind...or wrote some math and sketches in a piece of paper and then 'assume' that it will work wonders...you are just building "Castles in the Air"...they could fall anytime...and to me all that is virtual, Fantasy...I believe first than anything else, in the Fabrication of a working model , a Model that really satisfy your goals...that works...the explanations and the "Math" will come later...they will figure it out...but I placed on top of the table the Real Thing...Let them "Debunk it" ...While I seat back and enjoy the "Show"...

Keep up the work and keep posting the videos.

For sure I will...watch me!

My best Regards

Ufopolitics

[IndianaBoys]

For the Post readers:

Below are the direct link to the videos I was citing to Farmhand previously in our very smooth and non contradicting debate...

DEFINING RE FIELD (Part II) EM ANTIGRAVITY EFFECT - YouTube

DEFINING RADIANT ENERGY FIELD (Part 1) - YouTube

Thanks for watching

Ufopolitics

Ufopolitics, I believe you can use this without a problem:

DEFINING RADIANT ENERGY FIELD (Part 1)
DEFINING RADIANT ENERGY FIELD (Part 1) - YouTube


4 Public Domain Gregorian Chants for Download
4 Public Domain Gregorian Chants for Download ← Partners In Rhyme Blog

IndinaBoys