Update:
Baseline test (4 batts in parallel) done.
Batteries discharges to 10.5V (under load) thru 10W bulb for 7 hours 10 minutes.
Using Matt's TS they holds for 4 hours. Why?
First, transformer's output voltage before rectified on charged batteries is more than 15V - its +20% to load, because higher voltage on transformer's output = higher current to transformer's input.
Also some losses in transformer, maybe about 20% too. in summary we have about +45% to load.
Allowing that batterie's discharge time is non-linear function of load (known than loads higher than C20 ampers can't consume full ampere-hours from battery), we have 4 hours TS vs 7 hours without TS.
However, my 6-switch TS without transformer and rectifier (which is not needing for lightbulb) shown same results as parallel batteries. With rectifier result would be same, but minus about 0.8 - 1V (two times of voltage drop at shottkey doides, which I used) bulb would light a bit dimmer.
Baseline test (4 batts in parallel) done.
Batteries discharges to 10.5V (under load) thru 10W bulb for 7 hours 10 minutes.
Using Matt's TS they holds for 4 hours. Why?
First, transformer's output voltage before rectified on charged batteries is more than 15V - its +20% to load, because higher voltage on transformer's output = higher current to transformer's input.
Also some losses in transformer, maybe about 20% too. in summary we have about +45% to load.
Allowing that batterie's discharge time is non-linear function of load (known than loads higher than C20 ampers can't consume full ampere-hours from battery), we have 4 hours TS vs 7 hours without TS.
However, my 6-switch TS without transformer and rectifier (which is not needing for lightbulb) shown same results as parallel batteries. With rectifier result would be same, but minus about 0.8 - 1V (two times of voltage drop at shottkey doides, which I used) bulb would light a bit dimmer.
Comment