Coral Castle - Ed Leedskalnin

[amigo]

@Jetijs

I'm having a hard time grasping your first post about the electron, maybe because I see the electron as a hypothetical particle (lucky me my mom can't hear me now or she'd be stunned, being a professor of chemistry, and having made huge influence on me and my chemistry knowledge [which most of I have forgotten now, hehe])

Aside all that, is this a current theory among orthodox scientists, that electron is polarized and spins in the way you have depicted?

Somehow I have had this image in my head for many moons now, that the spiraling motion of electrons (if they even exist the way we believe them to be) is more like what we see in galaxies, than the standard equidistant orbits that extend into distance and create a spring like spiral.

As far as polarization of the electron itself, wouldn't that wreck havoc on the organization of the atom and add zillions of small oscillations that would happen each time an electrons in different orbits would pass each other. That would create instability in the atom and could push some electrons out of their orbits if they are all aligned in a such way so that the field of influence extends or gets amplified to that unlucky electron at the end.

@adam_ant

Are you suggesting that if we had silver or gold in the middle of a torus field created by 2KHz and 5KHz oscillations we would pulverize the metal?

Also, to both of you, I ask again, what kind of waveform are we discussing here that would drive the torus field to affect the elements.

I have always thought that square wave is not a natural kind of a wave and neither the sawtooth one. They are simply inorganically shaped, if I may use that kind of a comparison, and looked artificial.

I've noticed that in nature things are organically shaped for the most part and have curves and smooth transitions. There is some outer and inner beauty to everything just like the sine wave itself, which is truly a spiraling motion represented on a flat plane. Or perhaps there is one or more dimensions to the spiraling motion that we do not comprehend or see yet (or ever will).

I hope you don't mind me rambling like this, perhaps I don't know what I'm talking about.

[amigo]

I want to refer to a post from the previous page about the spiral periodical table of elements, there's one here

Wasn't it also suggested (I think I read that somewhere) that there is a missing element before Hydrogen which should fulfill the requirement of completing the Mendeleev version of the table in that section of the table?

So how would this hypothetically missing element fit into the spiral periodical table as well, since most believe that spiral version as it is now is complete?

[Aaron]

bifilar

Jetijs,

In your coil diagrams, the top one...bifilar around core may need to be modified to reflect the true pancake style.

The leads on the left of the coil need to be cut. One end on the left side then needs to be connected to the opposite wind at the left end...then you have two freed ends ... one at the left and one at the right...then you have the same as the pancake.

[Jetijs]

@Jetijs

I'm having a hard time grasping your first post about the electron, maybe because I see the electron as a hypothetical particle (lucky me my mom can't hear me now or she'd be stunned, being a professor of chemistry, and having made huge influence on me and my chemistry knowledge [which most of I have forgotten now, hehe])

Aside all that, is this a current theory among orthodox scientists, that electron is polarized and spins in the way you have depicted?

As far as polarization of the electron itself, wouldn't that wreck havoc on the organization of the atom and add zillions of small oscillations that would happen each time an electrons in different orbits would pass each other. That would create instability in the atom and could push some electrons out of their orbits if they are all aligned in a such way so that the field of influence extends or gets amplified to that unlucky electron at the end.

Amigo, I do not know if what I said is any ortodox scientist theory, I said that this is how I understand it with the knovledge I have now. I don't say that this is true.
The info that an electron has a polarity and that it spins the aether arount itself I found in that PDF document you posted in the topic about understanding magnets:

Also I think, that when an electron is influenced by an electric field say traveling in a wire from "-" to "+", then it aligns its poles to the direcrtion it is traveling. I have been wondering what happens in a tungsten filament in light bulbs. At first, what is resistance? I think that resistance is an electron density in a wire, the more electrons, the closer they are. If they are at the right distance, then there forms a counter spin in the aether between electrons, that does not allow them to colide and acts something like a pillow between the electrons. Here's a picture:

So what hapens if the electron density in the wire is so great, that electrons move even closer together? This:

They collide and shoot apart from each other in different directions.
I advise you to see that antigravity video in that link I posted. The man there explains this better than I can.
So, if the resistance is big enough, there are many electrons very close to each other and they are constantly coliding and shooting appart from each other and the coliding with other electrons and so on. This, I believe, creates the friction in the aether that causes heat and light


About the square waves. Do you know how the solidstate Tesla coil works? They pulse a square wave in the primary coil, but since the current takes time to fully magnetize the coil, the current waveform vould be a sine wave. You cold see this witha a current probe in your scope

[adam ant]

Amigo:

Are you suggesting that if we had silver or gold in the middle of a torus field created by 2KHz and 5KHz oscillations we would pulverize the metal?

NO, i said IF there are ANY results, it would most probably be a pulverizing effect. The methods that we use are so much more simple than what you guys are suggesting. the amount of power needed to do what you want would be huge, and highly inefficient. more than likely, you will onloy get a slight electrolysis effect, or the crumbling of the metals as i said above.

you guys have to take into account that every coil, and every length of wire has its OWN frequency. so what YOU input into it may not be exactly what comes out. you can take a length of wire, cut according to special geometric measurements, and they get certain results even without any obvious external (electrical) input. there are mobius coils, cadeus coils, Fibonacii ratios, Royal Cubit spiral coils, Phi ratios, Golden Mean ratio (Cheops pyramid in egypt), and actually, the Golden Mean, Phi can be in a Fibanacii series to show the incriments of CORRECT measurement.

as you look at Teslas pancake coil, do you think he just randomly made it out of any length of wire? NO!! he had VERY specific measurements, down to the last milimeter. in other words, his coils had their own self resonance to them.

[Jetijs]

Ok,
I have heard that that every geometrical shape affects the aether in different way. Pyramids for example. Also I somewhere read that the optimum shape of a water basin is the shape of an egg. This shape has an effect on the aether flow that is positive to the water. Also it is possible to make a container in a specific shape that makes the water inside turn into hydrogen and oxygen. Also this is why they use these coils around quartz crystal in earthpipes:

All this is affecting the aether flow in passive fashion with no energy input. So as I understand, its all in the aether, the atoms are formed only if there are certain conditions in the aether, if those conditions are altered, so will also the atoms. If only we could see the aether

heres an interesting link about winding mobius coils for various purposes:
Mobius Coil winding tutorial - toroidal

The coils are also partially active with no electrical power supplied in that they tend to attenuate scalar background energy.

This matches with what Bryan said

[adam ant]

now we are starting to cook with gas...


now look at the pictures you posted and take it to another level... SG, Joe Cell, Rife????

[Jetijs]

Ok, thanks Bryan.
I need to thinker about this for some time. I already have a few thoughts, but nothing solid. But I am sure that all the info in this topic and the links should show us the concept how to combine different materials, we just need to put the info pieces together properly.
What do you mean with SG? Bedini's SSG? If so, then this is where I am goilg with my thoughts.
However, thank you for your pushes to the right direction

[adam ant]

the SG comment was only speculation, not tested.

im wondering how a quartz crystal in the air core, coupled by a Golden Ratio coil would resonate. i think i have a few single terminated crystals laying around, maybe ill try it.

[Jetijs]

I made some solidworks drawings about how the aether would be twisted in a coil:



A view from top of the coil. Doesn't it look like a spyrogram ?

The green spiral is supposed to be the coil wire and the red spiral is the way how the electron movement twists aether. I hope this will help someone to generate new ideas

Edit:

there is a reason that i kept the info here, even though you might not see it now, there is a HUGE relationship to everything in this thread. hopefull one day we will be able to tie it all together.

So, in both topics (this and the elemental rod topic) we have come to the sea salt. You say, that there is a relationship. So this is what I have come up with. Our guy Ed lived in Florida near the sea (as far as I know). The coral blocks he used for his castle are coming from sea and are full of the sea salt. He might been used sea salt for health purposes. By doing so he not only revitalized his body but also kinda tuned himself to the coral blocks. So, if he had his sphenoinal bone free moving, he should have been able to move these blocks with his mind alone. right?

[amigo]

From everything I have read so far leads me to think that what we lack is not ideas on how to tap into the aether, but a way to have some sort of a visible, accountable measurement of the effect produced (if any).

I personally believe we should focus on producing instrument(s) that will measure the aether effect first and then use those instrument(s) to see what works and what doesn't out of hundreds of possible ideas. Everything else we are doing right now feels like tapping in the dark because we do not have any confirmation of theories through practical examples, unless they were already done by someone else in the past and we are trying to replicate them.

Of course there's no way to account for all the factors those original discoverers have had in their environments so it still means we need to be able to measure or have some sort of a sense for the produced effect in our own environment. Heck even between us here our surroundings are different and thus potentially affect the outcome.

It also does not mean that the way those people have achieved what they did is the only way or the best way of accomplishing the task which again means we need instrument(s)...

Just more rambling.

[Damien]

i think we must know what we are trying to achieve and then we can measure from there
What are we trying to figure out here.
I think 1. is how mr ed raised these blocks with (his mind if he did it that way) which bryan said he doesnät understand yet.
2.how to do it with a machine (similar to the accoustic levitation video i guess or mr hutchinsen)
3.How to "transmute" elements from other elements or the ether itself.
4.how to extract minerals from the sea salt (similar to above i guess)
5. spiral vortexes and the way they form the world
6.the different levels-stages elements can be at

The last one would seem the one we canät measure until we know what we are looking for

feel free to add any others

just though i post this, more for myself as im getting a bit lost and might inspire some new thinking

[Damien]

"No atom-smashing cyclotron needed; just a gentle nudge using the right frequencies. Focus and un-focus light-motion, create a vortex and control it"

what is light motion and what do they mean by focus and unfocus it

[Damien]

i think this could be interesting in relation to creating vortexs
http://jilawww.colorado.edu/pubs/the...tthews/ch8.pdf

[amigo]

What I was referring to is detecting and measuring aether and aether effects in some shape of form. None of our orthodox instruments really do us much good so far, so it's time for some out of the box thinking...