Originally posted by GChilders
View Post
So, if you "think" you've got it...means you still do not "get it" completely clear...
I will repeat what I wrote...
Magnetic Polarity reflected on drawings relates ONLY to the INTERACTING FIELDS, whether Stators or Rotor.
Meaning, IF We are talking about Stators set in the Outer Embodiment...then the INNER SIDE is what is Marked as their polarity...so We are "Disregarding" to show its Outer (Convex) [>(]Polarity Side.
If We are referring to Inner Rotors Polarity...Then We are referring to their Outer (Convex) Side that would INTERACT with Stators...So, We are disregarding their Inner (Concave) [>)] Side towards Shaft.
[IMG][/IMG]
But, but this terminology must be related to "Interacting Sides" reflected on drawing, as a "more general" convention...and NOT to "Concave-Convex" terms...because when I will show my Shaft less Motor Design...then it would be completely opposite to what a typical Shaft Motor offers, except when we are referring to Dual Rotors Asymmetric Motors...
Hope this helps...
And I love the description of your tests with Torque differences between Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Machines you have replicated...Thanks!
Ufopolitics
Comment