Open discussion for projects on this forum.

[Dave45]

Basic Concepts | Olympus IMS
When i froze the coils in water you could see the eddy currents they are there along with the magnetic field.

[Allen Burgess]

Subatomic particles.

Transundulationism:

[Dave45]

Im using a tablet and cant post pics for some reason.
I will keep trying

Finally this coil was powered using 12v ac, the eddy currents are clearly visible.

[Dave45]

This coil was powered with 12v dc
Notice the straight lines around the edges it formed a hexagon, like in a honeycomb.

[RAMSET]

a true asset to this community

Carroll
your worth your weight in gold around these forums !
@ Dave
always luved your frozen coil work !

respectfully

Chet K

[citfta]

Thanks Chet for the kind words. I does mean a lot to me that some people appreciate my efforts to help.

Dave, I remember when I first saw those. I thought that was a pretty neat idea to freeze water while a coil was energized. The difference between AC and DC is interesting. Thanks for posting those.

Carroll

[Dave45]

I froze one that i didnt document, wished i had. I lined the container with screen wire completely with an e core choke inside, essentially a faraday cage filled the container and froze it without power to the coil, the container expanded an busted and the faraday cage had a small tear in it, I then powered up the coil and put the container back in the freezer.
After about an hour I checked the container and from the tear to the choke there was what looked as best I can describe it a lightning bolt.

This is another reason I think the ambient or aether or whatever you want to call it is fueling the eddy currents.

[bistander]

Negative logic?

Here is the same experiments shown before, but as a Function of Time...:

Ufo,

So the above statement infers that the experiments shown before were not a function of time, therefore one would assume they were a function of space or position (referring to post #691). ...

bi

Isn't it logical to assume if someone says it was the same as before except in this way, that it wasn't that way before in that particular aspect?

So he graphs an experiment and doesn't label the abscissa. Then does another experiment and says this is like the previous one BUT as a function of time. That implies the first experiment was NOT a function of time, doesn't it?

It is difficult to figure out the logic, or lack of, that he uses.

bistander

[Ufopolitics]

Bistander came here to cry and complain to his Double Cifta about me...LOL

Isn't it logical to assume if someone says it was the same as before except in this way, that it wasn't that way before in that particular aspect?

So he graphs an experiment and doesn't label the abscissa. Then does another experiment and says this is like the previous one BUT as a function of time. That implies the first experiment was NOT a function of time, doesn't it?

It is difficult to figure out the logic, or lack of, that he uses.

bistander

Bistander,

Why do you come here to cry like a Baby?

I responded to you there (on my Thread) it was a DARN missed DETAIL on those small graphs!!

Did not know you were so picky when looking at an obvious and typical VXTime Sinewave Graph!!

Anyways, no biggie, it took me minutes to repair such a HUGE DEAL.

LOOK:







Now, do I have to explain to you also, that the green arrows mean movement direction...or displacement of the magnetic field N-S?

Is it ok in green color?

Or should I paint also a trailing dotted line to reflect movement?

So you came here, to the Energetic Forum Sensationalist Gossip & Entertainment Thread...to "complaint" to your "double" Cifta?


Here is my opinion:




Have a good one


Ufopolitics

The real huge difference between You Two (You, Bistander and Cifta) is that "tomorrow" I can build and upload a beautiful You Tube Video, in 3D Animated Graphs in Billions of colors...where there is absolutely NO ROOM for ANY misunderstandings...

[bistander]

Reason

Bistander,

Why do you come here to cry like a Baby?

I responded to you there (on my Thread) it was a DARN missed DETAIL on those small graphs!!

Did not know you were so picky when looking at an obvious and typical VXTime Sinewave Graph!!

Anyways, no biggie, it took me minutes to repair such a HUGE DEAL.

LOOK:







Now, do I have to explain to you also, that the green arrows mean movement direction...or displacement of the magnetic field N-S?

Is it ok in green color?

Or should I paint also a trailing dotted line to reflect movement?

So you came here, to the Energetic Forum Sensationalist Gossip & Entertainment Thread...to "complaint" to your "double" Cifta?


Here is my opinion:




Have a good one


Ufopolitics

The real huge difference between You Two (You, Bistander and Cifta) is that "tomorrow" I can build and upload a beautiful You Tube Video, in 3D Animated Graphs in Billions of colors...where there is absolutely NO ROOM for ANY misunderstandings...

Hi there Ufo,

I came here to get another opinion about that statement of yours. It appeared that you didn't want me posting more about it on that thread even threatening to tell Aaron. But I'm glad you showed up over here and posted those graphics. I've taken another look at them. You're all worried about arrowhead color and bragging about your fine artwork when you should be spending more time assuring the content is correct. In my opinion there are serious issues. But, as I have said, I don't want to get into it with you.

Regards,

bi

[Ernst]

While moving in the magnet produces 1/4 sinewave, while moving out 3/4 sine is produced.
The enlightening miracles of magnets....

Why don't you stop blah-blah-ing in that endless thread and come to the point?
Show us your OU-machine, or tell us how it is done.
Short and simple.
Stop wasting everybodies time and stop dumbing down others.


Ernst.

[Ufopolitics]

Who is dumbing out WHO?

While moving in the magnet produces 1/4 sinewave, while moving out 3/4 sine is produced.
The enlightening miracles of magnets....

Above Statement is COMPLETELY WRONG.

If the experiment is done properly, meaning using EXACTLY the same Speed when going In as when going Out, then the result is IDENTICAL in Magnitude between Positive and Negative Peaks.

There are several experiments that have been done with precision and accurate equipment like Balanced Pendulums, Balanced non magnetic springs, reciprocating mechanisms that do it exactly at same rate of speed that prove both action-reactions are identical.

You are NOT Enlightening absolutely NADA.

On the contrary You are CONFUSING people who read your above post and so sure "wrong statement"

Is that the same "accurate" approach you are using to display your Thread info?.

Why don't you stop blah-blah-ing in that endless thread and come to the point?
Show us your OU-machine, or tell us how it is done.
Short and simple.
Stop wasting everybodies time and stop dumbing down others.


Ernst.

I will ask you EXACTLY the same thing as you did above...

Plus...

How many more ..."ere many generations pass..." til we all see your final OU Machine...or your "Wheelwork Machine from Nature"?

Should we all wait for more "Cosmic Rays"?

Or maybe wait a bit more so Earth becomes Hotter?...maybe then we could convert that heat into electricity?

Maybe to cool us all off... Uh?

I am waiting for that "Final Disclosure"...

[Ufopolitics]

Hi there Ufo,

In my opinion there are serious issues. But, as I have said, I don't want to get into it with you.

Regards,

bi

Bistander,

Serious issues?...really?

Well, here you are not just "getting into it with me" but with all the rest attending this Thread...

I mean, isn't that the reason why you came here?

So, please do.

Regards


Ufopolitics

[dR-Green]

While moving in the magnet produces 1/4 sinewave, while moving out 3/4 sine is produced.
The enlightening miracles of magnets....

Why don't you stop blah-blah-ing in that endless thread and come to the point?
Show us your OU-machine, or tell us how it is done.
Short and simple.
Stop wasting everybodies time and stop dumbing down others.


Ernst.

If you ignore it then it will lose interest and go away, it's not a self-acting machine. It thrives on an external source of attention.

[Ernst]

* * the mystery of the changing images * *

If you ignore it then it will lose interest and go away, it's not a self-acting machine. It thrives on an external source of attention.

Guess you're right.


Ernst.