Open discussion for projects on this forum.

[citfta]

Hi gyula,

What my scope is showing is a pulse motor drive coil being pulsed with high speed pulses at the peak.

That is a very interesting video you posted. It most definitely gave me some ideas. Thanks for posting.

Take care,
Carroll

[bistander]

Not going there

Quote from bistander:

Magnetic force is not "Henrys". It is not measured in "Henrys".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uP2xEKH4qdc


Here's an example of a bifilar coil in self resonance that is spontaneously building a magnetic field that is measured in "Negative Micro Henrys":

Obvious attempt to sidetrack or hijack a thread. Sorry AB, I'm not replying there. We've been through it before. Nothing has changed.

bi

[bistander]

T. Reed

Hey Chet,

I noticed that you started a thread about a Clem engine effort by Tom Reed, aka Tommey Reed, Tommey L. Reed or Tommey Lee Reed. Be warned. He is vile and disgusting and stupid. Worse than BM. Please don't invite or encourage him here. I stay far away from the guy. My past experience tells me he is a danger.

Respectfully,

bi

[RAMSET]

perspective

bi
I have to be honest here.

never had an issue with Tom

But I have never shown anything But gratitude for his years long research and efforts .
I would imagine tens of thousands in time and money has gone into this ...
and here he just shares no strings attached?

open source ,and he is by no means a wealthy man ....I don't believe he even advertises on his You tube ??

I honestly believe the Clem engine was not a scam .
my personal opinion is a cavitation event is at play ??

to my Knowledge there is no one else working on the Clem design and sharing their work [quite dangerous], and lately Science is pointing to anomalies that were heretofore considered Blasphemous in the Halls of Universities .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IZ34Wwa-AE

it is good you express your opinions and experiences ,however
he is building and sharing work which may open a door to better understanding.
this we cannot afford to dismiss .

just one mans opinion.

respectfully
Chet K
ps

I will not be around to discuss this too much ,tons of work to do here...

[mikrovolt]

paper on compact acoustic inertial confinement technology.
http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-342/aflb342m669.pdf

[Allen Burgess]

Obvious attempt to sidetrack or hijack a thread. Sorry AB, I'm not replying there. We've been through it before. Nothing has changed.

bi

@bistander,

An Amp meter has a minus sign; Is that equally insignificant or does it act as a meaningful value?

Have a look at this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIeRR6NjMPQ

Hob Nilre's version of Lorentz's force law:

Magnetic force equals copper mass times watts!


Here's another question; What happens to a coil's inductance when a powerful magnet is placed close to it?

I can help answer this one for you, and I want you to put thinking cap on.

Coil inductance lessens in the presence of a permanent magnet field. The decrease in inductance can be used to measure the strength of the magnet field. Try and understand that. The negative inductance is a measure of the magnetic field strength in adjacency.

Look at Gotoluc's schematic below; You can see how his coil inductance drops as he closes his magnet space gap:

[RAMSET]

Microvolt thanks

http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-342/aflb342m669.pdf

there will be a multiforum open source investigation of this peizo tech and iron!! [in water too]
can you help?[Build with support ??]
if so Please PM me... or Email at Chetkremens@gmail.com

suddenly this thread is handling many important issues [and that's a good thing].

respectfully
Chet K

[Allen Burgess]

Negative Inductance.

@bistander,

I have an experiment for you if you own an inductance meter; Wind a small coil, air core or ferrite. Measure the inductance in Henrys. Place a permanent magnet close enough to the coil to lower the inductance to zero.

Finally, while your inductance meter is reading zero, place an additional small magnet on the first one and watch what happens to your inductance measurement.

Any negative inductance measurement from your meter can be relied on to be in direct proportion to the Gauss strength of the added magnet!

[bistander]

Same old ****

@bistander,
... The negative inductance is a measure of the magnetic field strength in adjacency.
...

So – how do we get a negative inductance ?
Initially – this seems to be impossible:

passive, absolute, negative devices cannot be built in real life just like that, because they do not

comply with the conservation-of-energy-principle. Negative devices do not spend energy – instead

they would generate energy.

In other words – with such a negative device, you could drive a perpetual motion machine.

So – the question is:

.

How do we solve a problem that cannot be solved ?

From:

https://4gang.wordpress.com/how-to-b...ve-inductance/

And even though it is called an ammeter or amp meter, it is a device used to measure current. The unit for current is the Ampere. Since the meter is used to measure current in a circuit, the resulting quantity does include a negative sign when the measured current flow is in the opposite direction from the indicated polarity of the instrument. This is not "negative Amps".

How did that transmutation test go..... Like I need to ask. You're just funnin' with us, aren't you?

bi

[Allen Burgess]

Talking points..

From:

https://4gang.wordpress.com/how-to-b...ve-inductance/

And even though it is called an ammeter or amp meter, it is a device used to measure current. The unit for current is the Ampere. Since the meter is used to measure current in a circuit, the resulting quantity does include a negative sign when the measured current flow is in the opposite direction from the indicated polarity of the instrument. This is not "negative Amps".

How did that transmutation test go..... Like I need to ask. You're just funnin' with us, aren't you?

bi

@bistander,

1.-Following your line of reasoning, there's no difference between the north and south poles of a magnet because they're both magnetism.

2.-You can't generate a negative inductance out of thin air, it takes power in the proportion described by Lorentz.

3.-The transmutation test may amount to perhaps the greatest scientific discovery of all time, depending on the outcome. I may choose not to go public with the results, due to the possible destabilizing proximate consequences; Like the sudden and catostrophic collapse of our commodity markets!

[bistander]

Chump?

@bistander,

Following your line of reasoning, there's no difference between the north and south poles of a magnet because they're both magnetism. Get a life chump!

Whereas you would say you got your positive Webers on the North and the negative Webers on your South pole, right? Who's the chump?

Attempting a serious discussion with you is pointless. I believe you actually thought you transmuted copper into molybdenum. You don't have a connection with reality, do you? Just leave me alone.

bi

[Allen Burgess]

Whereas you would say you got your positive Webers on the North and the negative Webers on your South pole, right? Who's the chump?

Attempting a serious discussion with you is pointless. I believe you actually thought you transmuted copper into molybdenum. You don't have a connection with reality, do you? Just leave me alone.

bi

@bistander,

Webers Shmaybers.

[bistander]

@bistander,

webers shmaybers. You're a nitwit.

Q.E.D.

____________

[Allen Burgess]

Hall effect sensor.

@bistander,

Tell a differential Hall effect sensor to detect Webers alone and not magnet polarity because you feel they shouldn't
show any difference.

[mikrovolt]

Agilent 2009 Impedance measurment handbook on why the meter shows a negative value.
When that happens you switch to capacitance. This is the procedure it states:

The measured inductance (Lm) rapidly increases as the frequency approaches the SRF because of the effect
of resonance. The maximum Lm value becomes greater as the device has a higher Q factor.
At frequencies above the SRF, a negative inductance value is displayed
because the Lm value is calculated from a capacitive reactance vector, which is opposite to inductive vector.

figure 5-10.JPG



United States Patent Number 512,340
COIL FOR ELECTROMAGNETS
Nikola Tesla, Inventor

""Figure 1 is a standard pancake coil (many Tesla coil builders are familiar with this style). Figure 2 is a bifilar coil, the crux of the patent is where Tesla winds a dual wire and then connects the ends in a series (an interesting experiment for coil builders).
Tesla explains that a standard coil of 1000 turns with a potential of 100 volts across it will have a difference of .1 volt between turns. A similar bifilar coil will have a potential of 50 volts between turns. In that the stored energy is a function of the square of the voltages, the energy in the bifilar will be 502/.12 = 2500/.01 = 250,000 times greater than the standard coil""