Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Open discussion for projects on this forum.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • seeing the unseeable

    I absolutely believe David always have
    and then you add Carroll's experience ??



    David had a load run for Weeks ...all kinds of loads
    Carroll witnessed the same "anomaly" but to a lesser extent.

    and Matt ...well he's had similar experiences .

    nothing to do with the storage characteristics of Lead acid batteries creeping up while resting.

    just way more power than could ever be explained.

    an urban Legend with a happy ending ??

    I hope so

    sorry for the intrusion ,But this ricards speaks a very interesting language
    and one which needs more "learning".

    respectfully
    Chet K
    If you want to Change the world
    BE that change !!

    Comment


    • Yes

      Originally posted by ricards View Post
      ...
      3BGS to supply household?.. no solar is much economical considering allocation of space for batteries required.
      Finally. I've been waiting for that observation. A statement I understand, and agree with.

      On your other post, no, I don't understand. But I don't want to discuss battery systems, or pulse motors; just Turion's 1800W/300W generator. He claims it stands on its own, no special battery system or special motor needed.

      Regards,

      bi

      Comment


      • Chet K.

        Thanks for chiming in. I've had motors run continuously from a battery for years. But as I mentioned, I don't want to discuss battery systems. Such is a no-win however I approach it.

        Regards,

        bi

        Comment


        • Energy

          Originally posted by ricards View Post
          The poison in your mind is that "The Energy" must come from somewhere..
          To ricards and all,

          Here is a good article about the definition of energy.

          https://www.forbes.com/sites/startsw...hat-is-energy/

          Regards,

          bi

          Comment


          • Originally posted by bistander View Post
            To ricards and all,

            Here is a good article about the definition of energy.

            https://www.forbes.com/sites/startsw...hat-is-energy/

            Regards,

            bi
            Bi, thanks a good read yes.

            but the author clearly stated this..

            ..But a fundamental, universal definition? That's an accomplishment that's still beyond our reach.
            now I'm wondering if you really read this or not.

            and I'm not a big fan of "Dark Energy"
            Last edited by ricards; 10-29-2018, 04:35 AM. Reason: and I'm not a big fan of "Dark Energy"

            Comment


            • Originally posted by bistander View Post
              To ricards and all,

              Here is a good article about the definition of energy.

              What is energy? As best as we know it, energy cannot exist independently of particles or systems of particles.
              (Even gravitational waves are made of theoretical particles known as gravitons, just as electromagnetic waves are made of photons.)
              Energy comes in a variety of forms: some fundamental and some derived.


              https://www.forbes.com/sites/startsw...hat-is-energy/

              Gyroscopic Primer by Prof Eric Laithwaite Full Video @ 44:37

              Al

              Comment


              • Why?

                Originally posted by ricards View Post
                ...

                now I'm wondering if you really read this or not.
                ...
                Why do you say that?

                I did read it. First briefly, then again more thoroughly as I was posting the link. In fact, I printed it.

                But just because I post an article for information, does not mean I believe or agree with every word. Such as dark energy.

                Regards,

                bi

                Comment


                • Originally posted by bistander View Post
                  Why do you say that?

                  I did read it. First briefly, then again more thoroughly as I was posting the link. In fact, I printed it.

                  But just because I post an article for information, does not mean I believe or agree with every word. Such as dark energy.

                  Regards,

                  bi
                  oh ok my bad.. thought you wanted to "lecture".. just sharing stuff.. thanks.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by bistander View Post
                    To ricards and all,

                    Here is a good article about the definition of energy.

                    https://www.forbes.com/sites/startsw...hat-is-energy/

                    Regards,

                    bi
                    Hi Bistander,

                    You are right!! an excellent article, thanks..

                    I ...basically love this statement below...not about "dark energy" though...:

                    1-When particles interact in an unchanging spacetime, energy must be conserved. When the spacetime they’re in changes, that conservation law no longer holds.
                    Do you agree with it?


                    Regards


                    Ufopolitics
                    Last edited by Ufopolitics; 10-29-2018, 04:45 PM.
                    Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

                    Comment


                    • ?

                      Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
                      Hi Bistander,

                      You are right!! an excellent article, thanks..

                      I ...basically love this statement below...not about "dark energy" though...:

                      1-When particles interact in an unchanging spacetime, energy must be conserved. When the spacetime they’re in changes, that conservation law no longer holds.
                      Do you agree with it?


                      Regards


                      Ufopolitics
                      Hi Ufo,
                      Do you agree with it?
                      No, but I don't disagree either. I don't know. Never have I claimed to know all. Just somethings. Glad you liked the article.

                      Regards,

                      bi

                      Comment


                      • Changes.

                        What exists at any one point in this 4D matrix does change though, the matrix itself remains unchangeable.
                        To an observer it changes, but when the whole of spacetime is considered it
                        doesn't.
                        Comments most welcome,

                        John.

                        Comment


                        • Heat death.

                          One way of getting an idea?

                          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat...f_the_universe

                          Comment


                          • Oh great!

                            Originally posted by Iamnuts View Post
                            heat death of the universe
                            One more thing to worry about.

                            Comment


                            • heat death.. black hole.. bigbang.. wormholes.. spacetime..

                              now more recently

                              dark matter.. dark energy.. energy creating space..

                              all of which are concepts without actual observational basis.
                              all based on conjectures and assumptions.

                              I wonder what is the next chapter of science is about.

                              Comment


                              • Wikipedia.

                                Entropy is conserved for a reversible process. A reversible process is one that does not deviate from thermodynamic equilibrium, while producing the maximum work. Any process which happens quickly enough to deviate from thermal equilibrium cannot be reversible. In these cases energy is lost to heat, total entropy increases, and the potential for maximum work to be done in the transition is also lost. More specifically, total entropy is conserved in a reversible process and not conserved in an irreversible process.[6] For example, in the Carnot cycle, while the heat flow from the hot reservoir to the cold reservoir represents an increase in entropy, the work output, if reversibly and perfectly stored in some energy storage mechanism, represents a decrease in entropy that could be used to operate the heat engine in reverse and return to the previous state, thus the total entropy change is still zero at all times if the entire process is reversible. An irreversible process increases entropy.[7]

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X