Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Open discussion for projects on this forum.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by bistander View Post
    ..


    OK. Whatever. I don't understand "excess energy". Like too much fun? Or extra money? Or she's too good lookin'? I think there's adequate energy. Man just needs to manage it better.... A lot friggin' better.

    Regards,

    bi
    You didn't understand?
    I just changed the words.. COP>1.. free energy... etcc..
    I just don't use those because most people like yourself is very sensitive to that..

    no you're kidding me!

    thermoelectric?

    efficiency is what?..

    so where is the other heat been transformed?.. oh I know at the other side.. of the thermocouple..
    don't you think that the electric current was because of the effect of heat conduction?... as the temperature balances in a system?

    piezoelectric?

    Efficiency?..

    where does the other mechanical, stress, vibration, energy, etc.. go?..

    heating the environment?..

    that is the usual escape!.. just to fit the theory (fact for you).

    If you're happy with that.. well good for you..
    no more worries..
    no more problem..
    no more guts to use, thus no more glory to earn..

    Comment


    • Originally posted by ricards View Post
      You didn't understand?
      I just changed the words.. COP>1.. free energy... etcc..
      I just don't use those because most people like yourself is very sensitive to that..

      no you're kidding me!

      thermoelectric?

      efficiency is what?..

      so where is the other heat been transformed?.. oh I know at the other side.. of the thermocouple..
      don't you think that the electric current was because of the effect of heat conduction?... as the temperature balances in a system?

      piezoelectric?

      Efficiency?..

      where does the other mechanical, stress, vibration, energy, etc.. go?..

      heating the environment?..

      that is the usual escape!.. just to fit the theory (fact for you).

      If you're happy with that.. well good for you..
      no more worries..
      no more problem..
      no more guts to use, thus no more glory to earn..
      reading the history of physics,
      at one point everyone was all excited about nuclear magnetic resonance being the free energy of the future
      I still wonder how this is not free energy
      and if that is possible, what else is possible ?

      Comment


      • Like the LED?

        Originally posted by ricards View Post

        no you're kidding me!

        thermoelectric?

        efficiency is what?..

        ..


        piezoelectric?

        Efficiency?..

        where does the other mechanical, stress, vibration, energy, etc.. go?...
        Originally posted by ricards View Post
        ...
        back in the old days they say LED can only be used as indicators..
        well luckily someone did not listen and the reason why we are using LED lighting in homes now.
        Did you ever consider by the time you figure how to tap the aether, the planet could be dead from man's mismanagement of energy? Improving our methods may be a better way to new discovery and curtail environmental destruction while doing so.

        I don't understand your problem with heating the environment. It's a fact. Unless you're running cogeneration using that heat for something useful, it is wasted.

        Regards,

        bi

        Comment


        • any one know what a heat pipe is ?
          go look at the earth in that aspect

          Comment


          • Originally posted by bistander View Post
            Did you ever consider by the time you figure how to tap the aether, the planet could be dead from man's mismanagement of energy? Improving our methods may be a better way to new discovery and curtail environmental destruction while doing so.

            I don't understand your problem with heating the environment. It's a fact. Unless you're running cogeneration using that heat for something useful, it is wasted.

            Regards,

            bi
            tap the aether?.. who said anything about that?..

            have a look at that bold part of your statement..
            management of energy.. yeah that's the one.. don't you think someone already did that?.. oh yeah you didn't believe him.. too bad you didn't get along well..

            you could have been the 3rd party verifier of that system.
            but that's all finished.

            I don't have a problem with heating the environment..
            I can't just accept it like that because it doesn't FIT the first law of thermodynamics.. if the planet is heating up where is the heat getting out?.. we have been using tremendous amount of energy and most say there are losses and those are HEAT. yet we still have the north pole and south pole ICE. oh and yeah it's still cold at night..

            you may say what kind of reason is that?.. right?..
            well I could say the same thing about heating the environment?..
            where is all the heat being converted to?.. evaporation?... great.. but not convincing..

            Comment


            • What?

              Originally posted by ricards View Post
              tap the aether?.. who said anything about that? ...
              Originally posted by ricards View Post
              You didn't understand?
              I just changed the words.. COP>1.. free energy... etcc..
              I just don't use those because most people like yourself is very sensitive to that..
              ...
              Where do you get your free energy?

              I don't think we're speaking the same language here. Every post from you contradicts your prior post. And who didn't I believe? Turion? You believe he has a 1800W out/300W in generator?

              Comment


              • too much.

                Originally posted by bistander View Post
                Where do you get your free energy?

                I don't think we're speaking the same language here. Every post from you contradicts your prior post. And who didn't I believe? Turion? You believe he has a 1800W out/300W in generator?
                yeah I think we don't..

                to you tapping the aether seems to be free energy..

                mine isn't.. I have been reading a dozen of aether related theories and papers..

                Originally posted by ricards View Post
                The poison in your mind is that "The Energy" must come from somewhere.. It must have a "Source".. like it is something "Consumable"..
                Energy can neither be created nor destroyed according to conventional science and physics.. what makes you think it can only be used once?..
                you just need to find how..
                Originally posted by ricards View Post
                ....

                I'm more willing in believing the excess energy and investigate it by experiment than believe what I'm told.
                so far.. It really looks like the excess energy is real. but not because it was created.. just not accounted for.
                Energy doesn't really look like a FIXED Quantity..
                more like only the "Quantity" something that you can quantify.. but really not a something...

                I have quoted my self.. which part is contradicting?..

                Comment


                • Finally somebody found it ! Almost every famous OU devices from the past tap Earth magnetic field, in a manner similar to heat pump or rather in a manner heap pumps should operate but their construction do not allow such mode of operation. What people didn't realized is that this process is the only solution to global climate change problem, but also to global free electricity (which is why it's suppressed). We missed the opportunity to get back to right track in 2012.

                  Comment


                  • ???? Questions

                    Originally posted by ricards View Post
                    yeah I think we don't..
                    ...
                    I have quoted my self.. which part is contradicting?..
                    Hard to tell when I don't know what you're saying.

                    What leads you to believe I think energy can only be used once? Where did I ever say that?

                    Why do you not answer my questions? You certainly load your posts with questions.

                    bi

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by bistander View Post
                      Hard to tell when I don't know what you're saying.

                      What leads you to believe I think energy can only be used once? Where did I ever say that?

                      Why do you not answer my questions? You certainly load your posts with questions.

                      bi
                      sorry truncated post.. had errors. check out now.

                      in your question, you seem to be looking at the "Source" of the excess energy (free energy)..

                      instead of the just sticking to the first law of thermodynamics..
                      I added the logic of "Cause and Effect"

                      aether as matter..

                      the abstract thing called "energy"... is somewhat derived from the real constituents of reality..

                      Matter.

                      and its properties
                      Temperature.
                      Electric Potential.

                      whenever there is an Imbalance in the properties of matter, there is measurable energy.

                      whenever matter is in motion there is also measurable energy.

                      I really like the equation E=mc^2 when c is not the speed of light.. but the "Rate of change"...
                      Last edited by ricards; 10-27-2018, 01:21 PM.

                      Comment


                      • what of chemical energy?.. cause and effect.. fission, fusion.. If I fuse silicon would I also get a very large explosion?..

                        what of gravity?..
                        grasping a plenum universe with aether, flowing towards mass.. gives a picture in my head.. why does it flow there?.. a theory is aether is converted into another form of matter.. which coincidentally matches with current astronomy's theory of star aging.. (gets bigger)..

                        what of planets?..
                        earthquakes are effect of tectonic movements..
                        why does it move?.. explained above..

                        there is just too much to write on a single post..
                        these are all theories.. yess.. but there have been experimental verification.. and an alternate explanation of reality other than einstein's.
                        an explanation where you can actually draw the picture in your head.
                        and yes even energy..

                        so to answer the question, where do you get the free energy.. nowhere because we didn't really get any.. we just measured more at the output..
                        what are we measuring then?.. the mass's rate of change.. E=mc^2
                        Last edited by ricards; 10-27-2018, 01:32 PM.

                        Comment


                        • here is a quote from one of my references.
                          "The spelling of the word A-e-t-h-e-r, indicates a redefining of this medium by starting over to the era of Descartes' Mechanicism, with the firm conviction that the human mind, which has evolved by the sensation of the mechanical world, can only comprehend nature through mechanical pictures or cannot comprehend it at all!. In this realm of Mechanicism, action at a distance is unthinkable and the only conceivable transmission of force from one body to another is through bodily contact through collision. motion can only be caused by motion and can only produce motion in turn".

                          I dunno what the problem.. sorry for triple post.. it doesn't let me post it all..

                          I know I'm in a really different language now.. so it is hard for me to communicate well.. and to make the point.
                          I have to make questions in order to form the logic. so it'd be easier than writing in a descriptive manner.
                          Last edited by ricards; 10-27-2018, 01:36 PM.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by ricards View Post
                            ...
                            in your question, you seem to be looking at the "Source" of the excess energy (free energy)..
                            ...
                            See. This is what I mean. You first used "free energy" in this conversation. So I asked you.

                            Answer this. Do you believe Turion has a generator which outputs 1800 watts while using only 300 watts input power?

                            And while we're at it, do you believe in the 3bgs and use it to supply your household energy?

                            bi

                            Comment


                            • cause and effect.

                              now to pertain logic that to the subject.

                              Pulse motors.

                              when the coil is energized(cause), a magnetism was created(effect). causing the rotor to run, here you apply 1st law of thermodynamics.

                              when the coil is de-energized (cause). the magnetism collapses (effect). causing large voltage on the coil to appear. here you apply 1st law of thermodynamics again. but this time you did not spend energy you ceased it.

                              3 Battery system

                              you charge the battery through a motor coil (cause). the motor turns (effect). the other battery charges (effect).
                              you then must apply 1st law of thermodynamics to both effect. but not in an additive manner.

                              The Generator..
                              I haven't tried this so I'm not commenting on it.

                              but I hope you get the point?..

                              they are small things but If you add them up the COP rises.. and could reach more than 1..

                              Charge_Calc.zip

                              here is a calculation of charge efficiency of capacitor with 84% energy transfer efficiency. take note of the actual voltage also written based on experiment.

                              they are just straight cap to cap connection, no coil no motor, an addition of a pulse motor and circuitry would increase the COP. but that wasn't my goal..

                              if you find any error on my calculations do let me know.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by bistander View Post
                                See. This is what I mean. You first used "free energy" in this conversation. So I asked you.

                                Answer this. Do you believe Turion has a generator which outputs 1800 watts while using only 300 watts input power?

                                And while we're at it, do you believe in the 3bgs and use it to supply your household energy?

                                bi
                                yes about 80% i would say It should be possible similar experiments shows it.. 20% because I haven't seen it myself.

                                3BGS to supply household?.. no solar is much economical considering allocation of space for batteries required.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X