Wardenclyffe - Tesla's true intention

[boguslaw]

My last attempt to remove "the noise" around spark gap. First ,let me assure you I didn't thought about thyratrons. I would not put the names here because it would be immediately found by some "bots"

Now, please just open your mind....Tesla is speaking

"This [Fig. 32] is another improvement in that particular device, which was the weakness of the invention and which I tried to eliminate. This device incorporated many spark gaps in series. It had a peculiar feature; namely, through the great number of gaps, I was able, as I have pointed out in my writings, to produce oscillations without even a spark being visible between the knobs. This device is now known in the art as the "quenched spark gap." Professor Wein has formulated a beautiful theory about it, which I understand has netted him the Nobel prize. Wein's theories are admirable. The only trouble is that he has overlooked one very important fact. It is this: If the apparatus is properly designed and operated, there is no use for the quenched gap, for the oscillations are continuous anyway."


"In this form of break [Fig. 33], I changed the atmosphere in which the arc was operating. The atmosphere was mostly hydrogen, and with this device I performed my experiments before the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia and the National Electric Light Association in St. Louis. This has been used by Poulsen and it is now called the "Poulsen arc" and "Poulsen system." But, of course, there is no invention in it. I am on record with prior publications, and besides, the hydrogen does not have any other effect except that it lowers the tension under which the device can operate. It has the disadvantage of producing asymmetrical or distorted waves, and the impulses obtained are not best suited for tuning."

"(...) Owing to the fact that the oil used was a very good insulator, rapidly flowing and of great dielectric strength, these make-and-break points were very close together, and the arcs extremely short. The effects were accordingly more intense. "


Don't you see that it's so simple !? Tesla was searching for a interrupter which could not loose energy and yet capable of switching high power , commonly at high voltage . Do you know why he used magnetic quenching or many spark gaps in series ? Tesla method is resonance. Spark gap is loosing too much energy to let LC circuit to oscillate properly .

[Gav]

... .. .... ..

[Ernst]

Part 5

This completes the "free energy" part of Wardenclyffe.
There are a few extra things involved, but those are much more easy to discover.
These include: Earth resonance and making the air conductive (to make it easier to give off charge).
Earth resonance has an interesting (and overlooked) feature, which I will explain later.

Hope you enjoyed the show so far.

Ernst.

[Gav]

.. ... .... ...

[Ernst]

That is a good question Gav.
Yet very difficult to answer.
Let's look at our water analogy. Where is that energy coming from?
In the end, it is gravity that performs the work, both in sending the hydrogen up and in making the water run down. But somewhere we managed to let the hydrogen expand from its dense packing in water, making it lighter than air. Then we managed to compress it again into water, which is heavier than air. Also we left the heavy stuff (oxygen) behind and recombined with heavy stuff that was already up there.
To find out where this energy is coming from, we have to study atomic and molecular interactions.
Back to electricity, this gets even worse, we will have to dig into the essence of matter.
I have (re)opened a door, but there is a long road behind this door.

My guess is that the vedas describe it pretty good. This energy is everywhere we just had not yet found the right plug/adapter to get access to it. In Tesla's words:

Long ago this idea took a powerful hold on the imagination of scientific men, but an efficient means for accomplishing this result could not be devised. The problem was rendered extremely difficult by the extraordinary inertness of the nitrogen, which refuses to combine even with oxygen. But here electricity comes to our aid: the dormant affinities of the element are awakened by an electric current of the proper quality.

This energy is present everywhere in an inert form. But using an electric current we can awaken this dormant element.
some random thoughts:
Moving a mass = performing work, but a wave travels for free.
An electric current requires energy for moving the electrons. Without those electrons you can move it for free, it becomes like a wave. You can add "pseudo charges" without any resistance, creating an inbalance. Nature does not like inbalance and will fill your "pseudo charged cap" with real charges. In a way you have created a vacuum and the outside pressure will fill it up.
Make any sense?
The real, short and to the point answer is: "I don't know".

Ernst.

[Ernst]

re-reading your question.... another answer could be:

energy manifests itself at different levels:
- movement is one of the higher levels
- sound is one step lower
- heat is one step lower again
- chemical bounds, again one step lower
- electricity is near or at the bottom end

It is all the same energy, it is just a different scale and therefor complexity.

Ernst.

[dR-Green]

Where do I claim it takes a long time to make?

Yes you're right, you didn't, I do apologise. You didn't say that directly, I was responding to remarks such as these which effectively tell me the same thing:

I think it will take 4-5 parts like this for the full explanation.

[dR-Green]

what are your thoughts?

You could equally say the same thing about a regular mountain, it's not a static object. You forgot about "time".

[PhysicsProf]

Ouch!
Forgot to reply to this one.



The good thing is. I am not subject to US law. And there are another few good things.
As I said before, I am lucky in more than one ways.
About the points you make...
We have thought about #1 too and applied for a patent in a country that does these things relatively quickly. There may be some delay of course, and there probably will be, but that does not really bother us. As said before, the patent is mainly to prevent others from aquiring the right to withhold this from ... erhm.. from us.
But we are facing a huge controlling power with tons of $$$. They can file a patent tomorrow and pre-date it to 4 years ago. They have the money and the power to do this.
They can draw up laws to prevent us from sticking metal rods in the Earth, if they want.
They have power to win in any case.
But we have more mass.
And that is where your point 2 comes in. It was my intention to put the whole idea out on the internet a.s.a.p. but my sponsor asked me to not rush things. And that is probably a wiser thing. On the other hand, as long as this info stays with a few people, these people are vulnerable. This too must be prevented.
Anyway.... the way you see it unfold now is the way we thought would be best.
As from today people are bound to understand the system very soon and with that our worries are over.

I will try your funnel someday.

Ernst.

I would be glad to share a solar funnel with you.

"As said before, the patent is mainly to prevent others from aquiring the right to withhold this from ... erhm.. from us.
But we are facing a huge controlling power with tons of $$$."

Good point! I wish you and all of humanity success as you proceed with caution.

[wrtner]

They can file a patent tomorrow and pre-date it to 4 years ago. They have the money and the power to do this.

They can draw up laws to prevent us from sticking metal rods in the Earth, if they want.

I believe the first stament is not true and the second is not enforceable.

Let us keep a grip on reality.
.

[Gav]

... ... ... ...

[dR-Green]

the volcano has the same energy weather it is dormant or if it is in its explosive form, still the same amount of energy is there
we can use the dormant volcanos energy, it does not need to be explosive for us to generate energy from it

Are you talking about heat, or something crazy? Heat would be feasible but one should keep in mind the concept of evolution when building things on top of a volcano. There are better options. Unfortunately imaginary lines on maps get in the way of those sort of things. Unless you have a natural heat source in YOUR country then you're having none of this that's over in MY country. The line on the map says so.

[Gav]

... ... ... ...

[Ernst]

Part 6: response to reactions from the i-net community.

I think the concepts should be pretty clear by now, eventhough many will refuse to believe it.
I hope it will at least spark ( ) more research. (at everybodies own risk, of course)
I will leave it here for a while.


Ernst.

[Ernst]

Yesterday late, I remembered I forgot an important key to this system: Earth Resonance.
I mentioned it a few times but I did not explain how it works yet.
It is a little bit different from what I thought first, and what I believe anyone would think.
But if you understand these first videos, you are bound to figure it out.
Anyway, this is the second time that I planned a small pause in the video releases and later realised that I should do a bit more. I'll see what I can do today.

Someone from another forum (and probably another reality) is asking how I measure HV.
That is actually a very good question because he is doing it wrong.
Tesla mentions that to obtain streamers from a 38 cm (diameter) polished metal sphere, you need 3 million volts to get enough charge density.
This charge density, of course, depends on the surface of the sphere (4 PI r²) and the charge relates to the voltage and capacitance C = Q/V or Q = C V. The capacitance in pF = 1.111 times the diameter in cm. From this you can determine the required charge density to be 28 nC/cm².
So now you need 1 perfect polished sphere and you can calculate at what voltage streamers will start to appear. With this sphere you can calibrate a Tesla coil, and with that you can test other top-loads that you may have and (at a fixed power level) you can measure arcing distance with these top-loads. At a fixed power level and with a fixed top-load you can say that the arcing distance is relative to the voltage, but increasing the power or sharp edges (or radioactive material or ....) increases this distance for the same voltage.
Streamers, as I said before, are an interesting phenomenon. There is an illusion of movement, but there is none. It is like a glass plate breaking, you can see the break (right word?) growing, giving the illusion of something moving inside the glass. But there is no movement. A sharp edge ionises the air, making it conductive and thus creating a point, a bit further away, from which air will ionise. The point where the electric density is strong enough to ionise the air is moving, creating an ionised path, while loosing energy of course. So the more power you supply the longer your streamers will get and once your streamers hit a metal object a current will start flowing (=discharge).
So there is a bit more to it than just measuring the arcing distance.
In the video where he claims 1.2 MV (36 cm discharge at 1 KW), considering the many sharp edges on his top-load and the 1 KW, my estimate would be closer to 300 KV.

Enough said about that. More interesting things to do.

Ernst.