Tweet
@madhatter
What I am describing is a very general case. Plasma of ions and electrons, is a special case, a much more complex case because we are dealing with masses.
In very simple words;
I am trying to show the fundamental process for creating a "whirl" is space, so to say, whereas plasma physics is the study of how "whirls" interact with other "whirls" once these whirls already exist.
Or;
We can talk about building a car and what makes up a car, or we can talk about traffic flows in a busy city, but realize these are two separate cases. The second case is special, and depends on the properties of the more general case.
Do not assume this idea is some eureka moment I had when I fell off the toilet and hit my head one day. There is evidence that just such a concept of Lorentz forces describes our Universe much more elegantly and simply then relativity. In fact this Lorentz theory, came before and led to Einstein's theory and is actually easier to visualize and understand then Einstein's relativity. Easier because, as you will see, to understand things in terms of Lorentz Theory, we must accept the existence of a "physical ether" just as Tesla says.
Couple examples:
Lorentz ether theory | Ask.com Encyclopedia
Dark Buzz: What Lorentz meant by the aether
Lorentz and the Aether
What I am describing is a very general case. Plasma of ions and electrons, is a special case, a much more complex case because we are dealing with masses.
In very simple words;
I am trying to show the fundamental process for creating a "whirl" is space, so to say, whereas plasma physics is the study of how "whirls" interact with other "whirls" once these whirls already exist.
Or;
We can talk about building a car and what makes up a car, or we can talk about traffic flows in a busy city, but realize these are two separate cases. The second case is special, and depends on the properties of the more general case.
Do not assume this idea is some eureka moment I had when I fell off the toilet and hit my head one day. There is evidence that just such a concept of Lorentz forces describes our Universe much more elegantly and simply then relativity. In fact this Lorentz theory, came before and led to Einstein's theory and is actually easier to visualize and understand then Einstein's relativity. Easier because, as you will see, to understand things in terms of Lorentz Theory, we must accept the existence of a "physical ether" just as Tesla says.
Couple examples:
Lorentz ether theory | Ask.com Encyclopedia
Dark Buzz: What Lorentz meant by the aether
Lorentz and the Aether
We can hardly admit that one and the same medium is capable of transmitting two or more actions by wholly different mechanisms, [so] all forces may be regarded as connected more or less intimately with those which we study in electromagnetism-Lorentz
it's within our nature to search such answers. I'm not claiming it to beyond our comprehension, any dimension beyond 3D is pure conjecture on our part, of how it 'looks' or the 'rules' that would apply. we don't divide up dimensions to create or introduce new ones, point singularity, line, sheet or plane, cube or sphere. our space is the cube or sphere, dividing it down we loose the 'space' and get reduction with loss of translation. taking that model forward then our 3d space is a reduction with loss of translation to the next higher dimension. classic example is the flat model of a sphere, there is no accurate way to draw a flat layed out map of a sphere, the Z translation causes expansion and contraction on the same vector, at best it would require mapping the 2d field as a function of velocity or time. draw the comparison to fields in electrodynamics and the use of a 3d matrix.
)
Comment