Originally posted by Ufopolitics
View Post
And If you assume or are implying that I think, asked or require you to jump then
you are assuming incorrectly, who's childish desire would that be ?
I agree you don't have to prove anything to anybody, but if you make the
claims people will ask for some evidence, to do otherwise would be unwise.
If you were to make a genuine video and show input and output power clearly
even if not all that accurate then there would be no reason for any disputes.
It doesn't bother me much either way, except for the claim with no backup.
The people who are considered fakes are the ones who are deceptive or
refuse to do any in/out measurements. How can you even claim more out
than in without measuring it ? If some kind of energy cannot be measured
then how could you possibly know it's part in an efficiency evaluation to
declare the over 100% efficiency ?
I'll tell you how, the work done as intended output, if work is done there will
be evidence of it and the amount of work done can be claimed as energy output.
ie, I think we all know that all systems are always 100% efficient in one way,
that is when the losses are added to the "intended" output the product is 100% of the
input, be it if the input is from us or from nature or from both. All can be
"measured" or determined, even things we cannot directly measure we can
calculate based on the work done in losses or output. If the result is too close
to call the chances are a mistake or something was missed or not considered.
If you can do a measurement and show work being done that is not
accounted for by the measurements then that is an indication of something
happening for sure.
So from what I can gather you don't want to show it because it would be
"showing off", but the "claim" of it is not "showing off", seems illogical to me.
..
Comment