Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Advanced Motor Secrets by David Squires

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Advanced Motor Secrets by David Squires

    "Scientists and Engineers Have Always Told Us That Electric Motors "Convert" Electrical Energy Into Mechanical Energy. Apparently, That's Not True!
    It Is Now Clear That Electric Motors Can Be Designed To Produce Mechanical Energy AND Recover Most Of The Electricity They Are Running On! This Turns The Idea Of 'Conversion' On It's Head!!"


    REVEALED: The most complete tutorial ever released to the public on how to design "super-efficient" electric motors. All aspected are covered, from the theory, to the math, to the design methodologies, to the physical model. If you have ever wondered whether real electric motors with a COP>1 actually exist, this presentation will rock your world!


    Advanced Motor
    Secrets™


    http://www.advancedmotorsecrets.com

    by
    David Squires, E.E.

    David R. Squires graduated from San Jose State University in 1976, with a BSEE degree. He worked in the semiconductor industry for the next 19 years as a designer. In 1995, Dave switched to the EDA side of the industry (Electronic Design Automation), specializing in high speed (fast SPICE) circuit simulation. In the same year, he began his study of "free energy" physics, with a special emphasis in magnetic field behavior and design. By exhaustive use of magnetic field simulation in the last few years, Mr. Squires has discovered a series of revolutionary principles that allow for the design of advanced electric motors and generators.
    Conference Series, Part 3
    BEDINI-LINDEMANN 2012Science and Technology Conference


    Get your copy now:
    Advanced Motor Secrets
    Energetic Forum Administrator
    http://www.energeticforum.com

  • #2
    All Is Revealed!!

    Hi Folks,

    Back in September of 2010, in the Electric Motor Secrets thread, I posted the following information:

    The DVD (Electric Motor Secrets) was produced 3.5 years ago, and since that time I have been working with a number of people on this concept. We have run hundreds of computer simulations on the method and developed very advanced designs, which I am not free to discuss here, because we have all signed NDAs.

    I can tell you that the ideal motor, based on these principles, has a number of characteristics. These are:
    1) The coil impedance of the system is quite low, to allow rapid charge and discharge of the coils.
    2) The inductance changes very little through the power stroke, to maximize electrical recovery. The way this is accomplished, I cannot discuss.
    3) The reluctance of the total magnetic circuit changes very little through the power stroke, as well.
    4) Input supply voltage is kept to the lowest value possible by limiting BEMF in the input coils. The methods used to accomplish this, I cannot discuss.
    5) Mechanical power production is managed by optimizing the timing, the size of the air-gap, and the total coercive force of the magnetic field across the air-gap, measured in Oersteds.
    6) Capacitors are used in the electrical recovery circuitry.


    Well, I am happy to announce today, that Dave Squires is the main person I was referring to here, and all of the issues I said I could not discuss are COMPLETELY REVEALED in Dave's lecture from the Conference.

    If you ever wanted to understand all of this, just click HERE.

    Best regards,
    Peter
    Peter Lindemann, D.Sc.

    Open System Thermodynamics Perpetual Motion Reality Electric Motor Secrets
    Battery Secrets Magnet Secrets Tesla's Radiant Energy Real Rain Making
    Bedini SG: The Complete Handbook Series Magnetic Energy Secrets

    Comment


    • #3
      Can't wait to get the video to see if my methods are similar to the ones in the video.

      No I don't have a working device yet but I believe its only a matter of time.

      Comment


      • #4
        good

        just finished watching the video for the first time. Very informative, gotta get my hands on and learn the simulator software he was using.

        My favorite insight is the description of how inductors are near perfect sources of current, and capacitors are near perfect sources of voltage. (Perfect for a short time).

        Where a discharging or opened inductor will keep current steady with what it was being supplied with. This explains the flyback transformer quite well. The voltage coming off an open circuited inductor will reach whatever voltage it needs to maintain the current.

        A discharging or short circuited capactitor will keep voltage steady with what it was being supplied with. Creating whatever current is necessary for a discharge.

        I think I need to wrap my head around those principles before moving too much further, but again, it all seems to boil down to "Inductive Collapse" or "inductive spike" or "flyback voltage" or "voltage spike".

        Similar to the bedini machine, paul babcocks ideas, the Kromrey machine, stan meyers water cracking, and even Dollards Analog computer in Longitudinal mode. Everything i've researched in the past few years has something to do with exploiting the inductive collapse!

        I love how David is very grounded in using the existing terminology correctly. We can actually describe "strange" phenomenon in normal terms. He also encourages people to LEARN THE BASICS before jumping into advanced research. I've found myself to be ignorant of many of the ideas he brought up that are really "grade-school" level electronics. Very humbling video, but encouraging at the same time. I highly recommend it.

        -Ben

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Peter Lindemann View Post
          Hi Folks,

          Back in September of 2010, in the Electric Motor Secrets thread, I posted the following information:

          The DVD (Electric Motor Secrets) was produced 3.5 years ago, and since that time I have been working with a number of people on this concept. We have run hundreds of computer simulations on the method and developed very advanced designs, which I am not free to discuss here, because we have all signed NDAs.

          I can tell you that the ideal motor, based on these principles, has a number of characteristics. These are:
          1) The coil impedance of the system is quite low, to allow rapid charge and discharge of the coils.
          2) The inductance changes very little through the power stroke, to maximize electrical recovery. The way this is accomplished, I cannot discuss.
          3) The reluctance of the total magnetic circuit changes very little through the power stroke, as well.
          4) Input supply voltage is kept to the lowest value possible by limiting BEMF in the input coils. The methods used to accomplish this, I cannot discuss.
          5) Mechanical power production is managed by optimizing the timing, the size of the air-gap, and the total coercive force of the magnetic field across the air-gap, measured in Oersteds.
          6) Capacitors are used in the electrical recovery circuitry.


          Well, I am happy to announce today, that Dave Squires is the main person I was referring to here, and all of the issues I said I could not discuss are COMPLETELY REVEALED in Dave's lecture from the Conference.

          If you ever wanted to understand all of this, just click HERE.

          Best regards,
          Peter
          Peter,

          Does that mean you can now join us over at Ufopolitics threads?

          Thanks for all your contributions and hope to see you there,

          IndianaBoys

          PS: I remember from his first post you referred him to EnergeticForum:

          Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
          First, I would like to say hello to all of you, I am new to this site, so take it "easy" on me... I was referred here to expose about my findings by Mr. Peter Lindeman. Who I admire much, and got to read his articles out there on the web and agree with him in a complete way in his ways of thinking related to Free Energy.

          Comment


          • #6
            Any OU motors built yet ?

            I am quite excited by this release but I am also keen to see a real motor. So the big question is - "Has anyone built a OU motor based on these ideas ?". If the answer is yes then when can we see the video and data etc ?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by mbrownn View Post
              Can't wait to get the video to see if my methods are similar to the ones in the video.

              No I don't have a working device yet but I believe its only a matter of time.
              @mbrownn - check your pm's.

              I've only watched this video once. I'm going to watch it many, many more times.

              My impression is that he is going beyond your methods, using a finite element analysis simulator for magnetics. It's called FEMM. I think that this is the link:

              Finite Element Method Magnetics: HomePage

              If I understand correctly, he is suggesting the use of a magnetic shunt to reduce B/CEMF. (Thane Heins?)

              pt

              Comment


              • #8
                I am familiar with finite element analysis although the only ones I have used is for stress and strain and for designing elastimeric seals.

                I was thinking more about the electrical circuit and the geometry. I haven't researched Thane Heins, maybe it is time I did. I have managed to use inductive compensation to increase current flow in the motor while also using that current to charge a capacitor which will be used for the next pulse. Recycling it if you will.

                If you remember how farmhand turned a universal motor into an induction motor this shows inductive compensation/transformer actions.

                Inductive compensation is a transformer effect and if configured correctly can increase current in the motor in the same way a loaded secondary increases current in the primary in a transformer. This increase in current then increases the flux in the armature producing more torque. In a transformer the reverse is true because the secondary is wound over the primary. In the motor all the flux has to pass through the armature before it reaches the secondary thus increasing magnetic flux in the armature.

                In a standard motor this compensation coil is opposite the power coil but I am experimenting with placing it somewhere close to 90 degrees. Some have shown in their videos that a shorted coil in this area can cause an acceleration so I am investigating it. A shorted coil is an inductive compensation coil. In their videos they had an open magnetic circuit where I have been using a closed one but now the geometry of the stator has to be taken into account. I believe this may be one of the reasons for the splits in the case of the Lockridge.

                This is more appropriate to the lockridge thread so I will also post this there

                Comment


                • #9
                  UFO politics has already found this

                  What about the UFO politics motor.. It takes 5volts and produces 9volts.. This is all known already, just put the brushes on both sides

                  Replication of Ufopolitics 5 pole asymmetric motor by netica. Video 3 - YouTube

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Wow

                    Thanks to the member that sent me the video

                    You have got to see this video, I have only watched it once so far but I think it answers a lot of questions.

                    The use of the choke has to be the primary function of the trifilar coil on the lockridge device. I had considered it as a possibility but dismissed it because I didn't really understand how the coils can maintain their current and that the core has to be so big. Its magnificent.

                    The method of keeping the saturation out of the pole coils may also be a function in the lockridge but I will have to test this. If this is the case, the coils on the poles are the generator coils with the power coils being at 90 degrees. this way there is little if any back emf in the power coils and the coils that are by the moving field are the generator coils and compensation coils in one. Again if I am right the compensation and generated current are in the same direction. If I am right, Bingo we have it.

                    I will have to watch this many more times to try and understand it and then set up some tests to confirm it assuming I have this right.

                    Somebody please get back to me on this.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Browny,

                      What video?

                      Penno

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by mbrownn View Post
                        Thanks to the member that sent me the video

                        You have got to see this video, I have only watched it once so far but I think it answers a lot of questions.

                        The use of the choke has to be the primary function of the trifilar coil on the lockridge device. I had considered it as a possibility but dismissed it because I didn't really understand how the coils can maintain their current and that the core has to be so big. Its magnificent.
                        I'd forgotten about the trifilar aspect of Lockridge.

                        Both, Babcock and Squires emphasize physically large coils. Squires even says that the choke is as big as the motor.

                        That would be the default case with the Lockridge device.

                        So the armature is also the core of the choke. Interesting form of reuse.

                        The method of keeping the saturation out of the pole coils may also be a function in the lockridge but I will have to test this. If this is the case, the coils on the poles are the generator coils with the power coils being at 90 degrees.
                        I'm not following you here. My only exposure to the Lockridge device is Peter's lecture and video.

                        I can't visualize where you think the power coils are located. Please explain some more or upload a sketch, if you can.

                        this way there is little if any back emf in the power coils and the coils that are by the moving field are the generator coils and compensation coils in one. Again if I am right the compensation and generated current are in the same direction. If I am right, Bingo we have it.

                        I will have to watch this many more times to try and understand it and then set up some tests to confirm it assuming I have this right.
                        Thankfully, it's easy to watch this video multiple times

                        pt

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Advanced Motor Secrets by David Squires

                          For people like be that have been trying to understand the lockridge device I believe it is a key video to watch.

                          We need to discuss the points in the video, the first point being the choke. On the Lockridge there is a large trifillar coil wrapped around the motor and I never really got its main function until now.

                          A problem with pulsing motors and allowing the current to drop to a zero state is that it is difficult to get any torque out of them without using very high supply voltages. having a big choke in the supply means that when the high voltage is required it is supplied by the choke and not the supply. The choke being there just to store energy.

                          Point 2 is about BEMF and how to avoid it in a motor. Its so simple, don't put your power coils where the magnetic field is moving.

                          In the video point 3 is the simulations and saturation of the iron. This is not in the video but is relevant to the lockridge, Of course if you move the coils, now you loose torque but if you place an inductive compensation coil where you would normally have the power coil you get current caused by the transformer effect and emf generated in the same direction provided they are on the same magnetic circuit. The question is in this configuration would there be any torque? this is why I need to set up a test?

                          There is much more and too much to put in one post but I suggest we use this thread for this.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by pault View Post
                            I'd forgotten about the trifilar aspect of Lockridge.

                            Both, Babcock and Squires emphasize physically large coils. Squires even says that the choke is as big as the motor.

                            That would be the default case with the Lockridge device.

                            So the armature is also the core of the choke. Interesting form of reuse.



                            I'm not following you here. My only exposure to the Lockridge device is Peter's lecture and video.

                            I can't visualize where you think the power coils are located. Please explain some more or upload a sketch, if you can.



                            Thankfully, it's easy to watch this video multiple times

                            pt
                            OK paul, This is all theory but but if you visualise a universal motor. now move one of the coils to 90 degrees so that you have, if you like, half the lockridge. now power the coil that is in the wrong position and the armature with a pulse. this will set up a transformer effect in the coil that is in the wrong position, effectively an inductive compensation coil or transformer. The motor wont turn so we move the power coil away from 90 degrees a little and now we have some movement. This then causes generation in the compensation coil. this means if we get the angle of the coils right we can have a motoring action, a transformer/compensation action and a generator action. As the power coil is in the "wrong" position as far as normal motors are concerned we get little BEMF generated to oppose our current, this means we can run on a lower voltage or get more power on the same voltage.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Squires suggests that the voltage needed to cause current to flow in the motor coil pulses not be provided by the supply. Instead it can be provided by the inductive kickback from a large choke that has a large mass of iron. In the lockridge we have a trifilar coil wound round the motor so it is now obvious to me that this has to be one of the main functions of the trifilar coil.

                              Not in the video but I believe relevant, is the fact that the motor coils, generator coils and trifilar coils are all wound on the same mass of iron. When an inductor that has an iron core is charged, that energy goes into the iron. If the iron was charged by the motor function, little or no more energy is spent on the iron during the transformer and generator functions therefore these functions should be more efficient than you would normally expect. If it is the choke that charges the iron and that choke is maintained in a charged condition as squires suggests, could it be that the motor function too is more efficient?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X