Mr Lester J Hendershot's magnetic generator.

[clarence]

both magnets ? directional flow effected by capacitors ?
I'm flabberghasted !

Hello GSM,
clarence, respectfuly would appreciate your insight on the operation of the "buzzer". you can easily straighten out all of my misconceptions and I will not be offended in the least. I have monitored your depth of knowledge in many of your past posts and I do respect your experience and posting. As always, mike, onward!

[GSM]

... the electromagnetic effect is additionaly intensified by the fields of both magnets both dually and singulary depending on the directional flow of the circuit effected by the capacitors ...
clue me with your comments ...

both magnets ? directional flow effected by capacitors ?
I'm flabberghasted !

[Dave45]

GSM you say my diagrams are backwards please explain, I am always open to new idea's.
This is a computer simulation of Jupiter and its ionization ring, notice its relation to the magnetic field.

Juno - Science:Magnetosphere
The magnetic north as opposed to true north causes the procession (wobble) as the planet spins, the electron model you posted is correct just not complete.

The ionization ring is the electric field (A vortex field) field of the magnet.

[clarence]

Clarence and Dave

Hello GSM,

clarence,

I believe that there are TWO magnets in the buzzer setup. one persay permanent type from salvaged magnetron - one persay temporary type ie. the bar --compliments of its determined proximity to the magnetron magnet.
N---permanent---S

S---temporary ---N
pole position shown arbitrary but not with respect to each other. I believe the bar proximity positioning determines the maximum field effect for the whole magnetic entity. so say now we have the field setup in place - why so?

first regress to the assumed radient potentially supplied capacitors that he set up in both baskets. they are dumb and dont know any better so as soon as they have received enough potential they just want to give it up and share! the problem with this blessing is that the time event of this action may or may not be sequential as necessary. confusion can reign - caps bumping heads. the director of operations is still sitting in his chair! I believe Lester referred to the noise when he used his earphone on the test locations as "sqqqeeeking" or some such. which to him meant the unit was operating but not performing the condition which caused this in this scenario we will say was the "buzzer" coils and cores having not been adjusted and moved into the correct proximity to the magnetic fields as needed.

BEHOLD! the director cometh! the adjustment is made and the CORES of the coils recieve their influenced domain action (Houston-we have lift off) and the more powerful pole strength of the permanent magnent determines the initial directional flow of the potential being supplied by the DIY caps and the ballet is on! the energy from the caps effects the buzzer units makeing them operate as eclectromagnetic solenoids. the electromagnetic effect is additionaly intensified by the fields of both magnets both dually and singulary depending on the directional flow of the circuit effected by the capacitors.

there will be a "sweet" point in the adjusting positionment of the buzzer entity with respect to the magnet field strengths. enough for now.

clue me with your comments. respectively, mike, onward!

[GSM]

Clarence and Dave

Guys PLEASE read this thread from the beginning - it took me considerable time and study before I opened this thread.

Clarence - you are almost there !

Anyone who has additionally read Gustav LeBon "The Evolution of Matter" will immediately come to understand the significance of basic photonic relationsips relating to tin-plate and aluminium foil.

Dave, your diagrams are always arse-about-face.

Magnetism is flowing/ rotating charge, so seek out the charge motion/ electron orbit alignments from the fields, and not what 'educationalists' wish that we believe.
Try looking at things the other way around and boy will you become annoyed at how our scientists and teachers have willfully steered us away from the real possibilities of magnetism; ie. stop drawing equal-weakness field lines and draw polar field strengths instead.

Cheers ......... Graham.

[clarence]

the amazeing hendershot

Hey Clarence,
Interesting observation the cap and coil create an LC circuit on both sides and the way the cap is made it could be drawing energy.

If we have two LC circuits in the same circuit they must be working 180 out of phase, they are bouncing energy back and forth across the buzzer coils.

Hello Dave45,

clarence,
presuming that the remade caps are radient energy receivers for each half of the push pull and do act as the prime movers there has to be a "traffic cop" per say to allow the initial direction of voltage and current flow through each half of the circuit so that everything always flows in unison. I will say that that traffic cop is the MAGNET with its N and S poles pointing in the initial direction of flow. once that flow is initiated I believe all of the caps themselves will tend to keep the alternation in order. also the orientation of all the coils windings and the "dot" codes of the transformers themselves should be observed. you are correct I believe when you say this is a perfectly balanced system.

the next main item I have been considering is the "oscillation of the buzzer " and how it is effected in order to maintain the whole push pull operation frequency perfectly. there is a whole lot going on in this "junkyard invention" that doesn't first meet the eye thats for sure!

I am curious to know what your thoughts on the buzzer would be. love to hear them.
mike, onward!

PS: loved the drawings also!!

[Dave45]

Hey Clarence,
Interesting observation the cap and coil create an LC circuit on both sides and the way the cap is made it could be drawing energy.

If we have two LC circuits in the same circuit they must be working 180 out of phase, they are bouncing energy back and forth across the buzzer coils.

This is the most asymmetric system Iv ever seen, Im not sure I trust Crusty's circuit I guess a person would have to test it to find out, the buzzer coils are wound wrong for an asymmetric system.

Another one of my crazy drawings

[clarence]

Hey Clarence I noticed that too, its said he built several different versions, I think the transformers would work better in the magnetic field of the basket coils than the caps.
I found these caps at mouser 1000 uf capacitor Film Capacitors | Mouser Im not sure if they will work what do you guy's think they are not electrolytic they are film used in dc filtering.

Hello Dave45,

clarence,
I dont know about the use or nonuse of those capacitors - however I DID find some for 500v AC in both 500uf and the 1000uf values. they are made by ELECTRICON, INC- I believe in germany and they are power caps.
500uf 500v #E62.R17-504M10
1000uf 500v #E62.S24-105C20
you will have to find a distributor. just thought I would pass it on. LOL
mike, onward!

[clarence]

Hello Dave45,

clarence here,

just a note of thought -it is evident that there is initially a prime-mover to Hendershots devices and I dont personally belive it is the magnetic oscillator (my opinion- as all you know the worth) , however the movers in his device are: 1- coils
2-capacitors
3-cores
4-magnet
It occured to me that tesla was his mentor, and that he was supposedly knowledgeable of his inventions and patents. remembering that when studying the schematic I was thinking just why in the hell would he destroy a perfectly good capacitor and then put it back together to use it in a disrupted manner? there had to be a reason and a method to his madness. then when I saw the schematic again the picture of Teslas radient energy device came to mind! (thumbnail below) I believe he was useing the long piece of salvaged foil as his antenna plate for receiving the radient potential and at the same time useing the two short pieces of foil as a transmitter to power the initial L1 coil to consequently operate the rest of the device.

consider it a reversal of the normal transmitter-receiver relationship. I believe the energy in the disrupted capacitor elements would begin to amplify as the L1 coil itself would begin to alternate and definetly bring the circuits to life.

Just my thoughts, but all of us know some method brought these units to life!

PS: He also placed concern on keeping the frequency on both of the disrupted capacitors exactly the same. which was another possible use of the test points in the circuit and during normal use those points were open. If just being open all the time then what would any purpose for the disrupted capacitors be other than the KEY initial mover?

mike,onward!

[Dave45]

Im sorry if its already been posted I ran across this site and posted it.

Did Hendershot invent the alternator we use today, but his self ran? very interesting.

What would happen if we connected the sandwiched coil to a cap and arranged permenant magnets around the perimeter of the claws, or just a horseshoe magnet as Hendershot seemed to favor.
Changing the capacity would change the frequency that the claws flipped their poles.

Just some thoughts, wondering how he got this arrangement to self run.

[GSM]

The Hendershot Mystery(98)140pp

Please Dave, what is it you wish us to consider ?

Have you read all of this thread to date, for so much has already been covered ?

Cheers .......... Graham.

[Dave45]

The Hendershot Mystery(98)140pp

[GSM]

The metal used in this version of the PCU's rings are made of cold rolled mild steel and thus are magnetic. They are spot-welded at the seam multiply / overlap point. The inner diameter of the metal rings is 5.25 inches, and a height of 2.75 inches.

Strikes me that the only thing different in this description when compared to Hendershot's original working devices relates to the metal being used.
The original cores were cut from good old fashioned 1940-50's tin cans.
They don't make them like this any more, yet originals are still available on e-bay as collectors pieces;-

Vintage Maxwell House Drip Grind Coffee Tin Can Lid 1lb Advertising Lithio 2 | eBay

Note: A 40uF capacitor on both sides of the buzzer does not make sense.

Cheers ........... Graham.

[Dave45]

[Dave45]

Generator built to specifications by way of Lester Hendershot Aho.

Should, according to the current owner during the commissioning
Lester Hendershot have brought a 60 watt bulb to light up

This version will be known to you safely from the Internet:

In the footer of this brochure in the background is my opinion, "By Arthur C. Aho".

Here one sees the buzzer.

Both electromagnets are similar from a bell expanded and the metal strip in which the two electromagnets are secured (at the side where the connector contacts), fixed to the piece of Plexiglas and slidably connected to the spindle to the magnet / sheet metal strip.
This can be seen on the last picture in this document one more time.
The DC resistance of the two coils in series is 6 ohms.
The magnet is 5 inches wide, 1.5 inches deep, and 1 inch high.
The metal strip is 5 inches wide and 1 inch high.
The external dimensions of the electromagnet are: 2.5 inch length at 1 inch diameter.
The diameter of the enamelled copper wire is about 0.51 mm or about AWG 24

From a report by Skilling I learned that the buzzer is the interior of a larger built headphone speaker. I can not quite understand that on a magnetic speakers (see diagram), which in my opinion, this arrangement comes During the next wound coils on the costs associated with the magnetic poles of iron bars. Then when a voltage is generated at the coil magnetic field would be superimposed on the magnetic field of the permanent magnet and thereby modulate the magnetic flux through the iron rods and the iron membrane. The air gap between the iron rods and the membrane can be adjusted in such headphones via a thread. That lasts again a similarity to the buzzer.

Ma = magnet, S = coil, Me = iron membrane
Furthermore shows Skilling, Hendershot had used during his early attempts headphones and when he heard a scratching noise "scratching sound", this was the sign that the generator is now in operation and was unable to give a performance.
In the development and increased capacity of the generator has run this "Loud Speaker" larger dimensions and a part of the generator.

This is the "left" PCU.
I had always wondered what else should be that TEST "point".
This detail photo and the diagram (see below) it is clear

The coil is wound flat on the bottom section of the wire coil is, look at the two "+ contacts" of the former duo TM58 - "clipped" electrolytic capacitors.

This is the wire coil of the "right" PCU. Again, the ground pin of the former duo TM58 Elko's is brought out. He was pushed to the test directly to the terminal contact of the lamp base. I have it shown by dotted lines in the diagram

View of the transformer / transformer in the "left" PCU.
It is an American 110V to 6.3 V power transformer.
The metal used in this version of the PCU's rings are made of cold rolled mild steel and thus are magnetic. They are spot-welded at the seam multiply / overlap point. The inner diameter of the metal rings is 5.25 inches, and a height of 2.75 inches.

The circuit reminds me rather of the information published by Skilling and O'Brian diagrams. What is new is the presentation of lampwork capacitors in the PCU's. The mass foils us connections of the former Pyramids TM58 Duo electrolytics I have with drawn because they are used in this circuit.

All unmodified capacitors have a capacitance of 40μF at 110V AC.

I have canceled the pictures because I'm not in the mood to create the basis for lau any item in any "free energy" Newspapers / Manuals.
To replace the devalued against not good, I have seen images / movies etc. regarding this topic, I'm ready.
If interested please crusty7@gmx.de