Mr Lester J Hendershot's magnetic generator.

[JVonD]

What can I say ?
.....
Cheers .................. Graham.

Thanks GSM. "Ferrous sleeve" Got it thanks!
Please forgive my arrogance. I have read "Secrets Of Perpetual Power" and thought that maybe you guys might have tested the different circuits and figured out the best setup.
The only reason I mention that about Morpher is cause I have watched a lot of his videos and have a lot of respect for him but he doesn't really explain things in layman's terms and "I don't understand them" or what he is trying to do have the time. Yes I'm a dumbass in this area.
I was hoping to find somebody to summarize the thread because I don't have a lot of time to read a ton of technical jargon that I don't understand and I figured you geniuses have tested things and could give me a little guidance.
I'll continue my search... Thanks! ~J Cheers!
(Hope my next tutorial video on youtube will be a Hendershot.)

[GSM]

Thanks GSM. "Ferrous sleeve" Got it thanks!

I'll continue my search...

Think we all are JVonD.

Sheet iron sleeves - The self sustaining electric generator
with plated surface domains.

Pulsed iron rods - Hubbard Amplifying transformer
contacting within tubes.

Cheers ............... Graham.

[ewizard]

double post

[ewizard]

Guys and Gals -

I have been spied upon (computer + telephone), my computer interfered with, and I have been conspicuously followed by ****wits for many years since I first wrote about molecular dissociation by TPTB on YouTube in relation to 9-11.

Why do I call them ****wits, because they stopped developing their own personal human spirit the moment that their watching of other people's positive lives and the truthful work became the main importance of their own secret belief of lie driven life-force corrupting activities.

Today my last post took quite some time to load and I had time to make a copy/ paste in case it might disappear.

Whilst I was waiting I thought that I would erase back letters in the address bar in order for my Windows browser to be redirected directly to the energetic forum home page, thereby bypassing the reply address still showing there, or so I thought.

The energetic forum became unobtainable, even when I retried twice again directly from my separate desktop shortcut.

Whilst trying to reconnect so that I might check my post I noticed that something of significance showed in the drop-down choices which appeared below the address bar. This was after I right clicked and then left clicked on the address bar in order to turn it blue plus erase back some of the energetic forum address letters; it is shown in the attachment.

So BING has an automatically activated external keystroke reader as well as g'OO'gle, and had clearly been in control of my Window !
Maybe I should tell them in their own address bar where to go. LOL.
Of course it is turned off now, but - Do I trust these providers - No way.

Cheers ........... Graham.

warning - somewhat OFF TOPIC:

May I suggest a few good solutions? https://ixquick.com is a private search engine that saves nothing at all. Also https://www.startpage.com which is related to ixquick.com but actually uses the google search engine annonymously to return results to you and google knows nothing about who or where you are at. Also a couple good programs to have that will mask your IP address and encrypt everything you do on the Internet are available from Spotflux Free VPN (unlimited data free) and SecurityKISS - Free VPN Service (limited to 300 Mb per day free - paid gets you unlimited). Spotflux may slow downloads about 5%. I think security kiss may slow them a small amount also but for the most part it's unnoticeable if you have DSL or cable. If you want really industrial grade security I can tell you some more options but for most purposes these will help.

[GSM]

Hi ewizard.

Sincere Thanks for your suggestions, however there is no longer any Internet Security - it does not exist unless via an original one-to-one codex.
Heck, even the UK Census information of every UK resident went to US/ Israel !

Also every MS operating system computer 'phones home' as part of the boot-up process *before* the 'security' software loads and the desktop becomes fully user operable, or later if unable to do so, this not being just for updates either. And every MS, Apple etc. device is accessible via 'security' forces 'for the good of' every user, or for hacking to download files of compromising information should those PTB who give themselves the rights to do so need reason to have any person arrested/ investigated.

What once was good has either become compromised, or denied, or lost via the passage of time, and in view of my efforts here I wonder if I might be allowed to off-topic link this performance relating to where I feel we still are right now -
Learning to Fly - Multicam - Pink Floyd 1994 Pulse & PPV (rare) - YouTube
yes - we will !

Cheers .............. Graham.

[GSM]

Graham,

Hope the painting's going well.
Bob

Painting outside - slow because of weather.
Painting inside instead.
Where painting = thinking !

There must be something we have never been informed about relating to this generator and it must relate to the core-cap assembly, and the unclear description of external connections reported as being necessary to bring this device into operation or turn it off.
It might even have something to do with Lester's massive electric shock, possible if attempting demonstration under conditions of observational distractions.

I must now study all existing photographs, though note that an excellent link to some I posted in June of last year no longer works.

Cheers .............. Graham.

[a.king21]

Gsm

I agree - it's not possible to have internet security. BUT BUT BUT... we don't have to pay the b.....ards to spy on us.
By using Google and hotmail they dump ads on you which gives them money.
By using startpage they don't get a cent from you. You could also go the whole two finger route and use yandex.com for both browsing and email. It's a Russian operation. Oh how times have changed.

[ewizard]

I'm getting real fed up with the situation here.
Sometimes I am able to error correct a post, sometimes not.

With the last one above as I write this, yet again I'm reduced to copy-paste into desktop wordpad, correct it, and then again copy-paste to repost on the forum.
As below for Sunday 22nd Sept, when completed.

Not sure if you've seen this before but Aaron told me you have to go to the 'Advanced' tab to be able to edit a post successfully 100% of the time otherwise it's hit and miss. (click Edit then click 'Go Advanced')

[thx1138]

Unified physics

Not sure if you've seen the work of Harold Aspden but he spent 50+ years on a related topic that seems, to my mind, to unify physics but then I'm no scientist. The math is over my head but I still get the gist of what he is saying. It is basically this: the electron is not a fundamental particle but it is derived from something even more fundamental that he calls the aether. There is a lot written and supposed abotu the aether but after 2 1/2 years looking at this stuff his is the clearest explanation to me.

In 50+ years he did a lot of work so there is a lot to digest but he has 10 lessons that explain the fundamentals of it. these lessons are fairly far down into his work but it is a good starting point.
Tutorial Lessons

And here is a link to the top level of his site.
Energy Science

Edit: A new form of matter - light molecules (photon molecules) - photons DO have mass which changes everything. Actually, I guess it doesn't really change anything but people's perspectives.
Scientists Create Never-Before-Seen Form of Matter

[GSM]

House painting postponed due to rain.

Not sure if you've seen the work of Harold Aspden
It is basically this: the electron is not a fundamental particle but it is derived from something even more fundamental that he calls the aether.

Thanks thx1138.

I cannot say that Harold is wrong, but the model in my mind relating to magnetism being the alignment of electron orbit spin axes directly led to my successful hands-on inception and optimisation of the ferrite sleeve antenna.
Concept before construction.

Here the electron orbit was viewed as being in a self powered gyroscopic relationship with the parent atomic nucleus, and magnetic induction causing electrons to axially precess into alignment; ie. an axial rotation and not just an instantaneous flip directly from one spin alignment to another.

Thus whilst the coil winding induced precessionary alignments of electron orbits is speedy at a ferric surface, the same situation cannot arise at deeper sited ferrite electron orbits because these remain more closely coupled with the body of neighbouring alignment. The deeper the field induction required within a material the longer the induction field alignment precession wave takes to penetrate.
And it is the same in reverse.
A deeper field induced within a core takes longer to fully collapse outwards than does that on the surface of a core, whether that field be generated by current flow or magnetic induction.

Thus a DC or slow AC induction, as with the short circuit turn Hendershot sleeve, can create an inner field bias about which a surface orbiting electron can be transient magnetic field induced to precess, not unlike a little gyroscope, and this especially so if a single current induced transient simultaneously set up opposing magnetic fields via oppositely connected end of sleeve core windings. The centre field thus cannot fail to change direction in a compression region, and thereby induce highly energetic surface domain spins whereby electron axis rotations normal to their spin orbits forces electrons completely out of base atomic relationships in exactly the same way as would whirling around an already spinning gyroscope in Earth gravity.

Hence I have suggested that the Hendershot core undergoes elemental devolution with fundamental energy release.
What nature of energy release is this though, merely of electrons, 'electron capture' or Beta emission.?

An unavoidable outcome of Beta release is the generation and development of an electric charge by the remaining matter, which in this case is the Hendershot sleeve core, and this charge must develop with respect to emission recipients, whether these be near or far.
Thus without any electrical connection being made to the ferrous sleeve cores within a Hendershot generator they cannot fail to build up a substantial charge with respect to the nearest conductor - the aluminium capacitor.

This I why I wanted to check out the photographs of the Hendershot generator for there is no mention of any connection to the core sleeve in this device, and yet without same a fatal shock voltage would build up on that sleeve until either the electron precession was overcome, or there was a break down of the insulating material between the ferrous core and the aluminium capacitor.

Thus I firmly believe that some information was held back from both the publication notes and the formal Patent filing in relation to a grounding or the taking of useful electrical output from the central ferrous sleeve in which this fundamental non-radioactive nuclear activity is being induced to occur.

If a beta particle impacts an atom of aluminium then the aluminium matter develops a charge, so was the capacitor exactly as described in Hendershots drawings, or could a differential charge have developed and been used in some way. Maybe different arrangements were tested and not all revealed ?

The thing here that I am left wondering about relates to there being only two capacitor connections with the coil 'D' windings of the circuit, yet illustrations show three capacitor foils. Yes the longer foil could be merely have been a series connection electrode, but was it left disconnected ? Had there even been some kind of energetic pulse delay line effect integral with tuning ?

Were there two capacitor arrangements in one with the Hendershot generator ? The two short foils used primarily for tuning, but a ferrous core to long aluminium foil energy generating positive feedback loop capacitor not indicated on the drawings and needing additional external wire links before operation could commence ?

Another aspect in relation to development would relate to the establishment of coil winding 'D' type tuning via fixed plus adjustable capacitors. Could this simplify aluminium foil capacitor overwind arrangements to just one concentric electrode around the sleeve core, or might transduction be accomplished by another separate coil winding in place of the foil, say tinned and stranded copper wire ?

One aspect I do not see arising is an effect related to magnetically induced electron/ atomic alignments within the hand made capacitor dielectric because the induced magnetic field was virtually centre node reflecting with respect to both core and capacitor ends.

And so I ask myself whether two complete assemblies remain essential to the operation of a Hendershot device and I have two answers. If a charge field reflecting magnetic buzzer is to be the energising source - yes; however if modern electronic circuit energisation methods are to be used then I think that only one well set up core should be essential, as per Kapanadze.


Cheers ............. Graham.

[thx1138]

Hendershot, Aspden, and Tesla

Please understand I'm just a layman that has been looking at these things for about 2 1/2 years now. These are some of my thoughts.

Hence I have suggested that the Hendershot core undergoes elemental devolution with fundamental energy release.
What nature of energy release is this though, merely of electrons, 'electron capture' or Beta emission.?

Or could it be that the "underworld aether", as Aspden puts it, absorbs and stores the energy to be released later as part of the transition back to equilibrium so that no energy release occurs in the "overworld" (my term) that we observe?

Thus I firmly believe that some information was held back from both the publication notes and the formal Patent filing in relation to a grounding or the taking of useful electrical output from the central ferrous sleeve in which this fundamental non-radioactive nuclear activity is being induced to occur.

Or the information being held back is the relationship to the aether, which at that time would be a definite plus so as to not have scientists of the day dismissing the project without even looking at it.

The thing here that I am left wondering about relates to there being only two capacitor connections with L4s of the circuit, yet illustrations show three capacitor foils. Yes the longer foil could be merely have been a series connection electrode, but was it left disconnected ?

What strikes me about the elongated part of the capacitor is how it relates to Aspden's 3 concentric plate capacitor. In determining how to build Aspden's device I worked a little on the dimensions of the cylinders and, referring to Lowenstein's work on capacitances, the only way I see of having concentric cylinders with the same capacitance is to extend the inner cylinders' lengths so that it has the same surface area of the outer cylinder. So the larger the differences in diameter, the greater the required length of the inner cylinder. And I may be off base here but I see the same kind of arrangement in Tesla's US patent 1,119,732 (Wardenclyffe) with coils A, B, AND C being concentric and coil B protruding a short distance into coils A and B. In that patent Tesla states, "The coil B is wound on a frame or drum D' of insulating material, with its turns close together. I have discovered that when so wound the effect of the small radius of curvature of the wire itself is overcome and the coil behaves as a conductor of large radius of curvature, corresponding to that of the drum.", i.e. the coil acts as a cylinder the size of the drum.

And so I ask myself whether two complete assemblies remain essential to the operation of a Hendershot device and I have two answers. If a charge field reflecting magnetic buzzer is to be the energising source - yes; however if modern electronic circuit energisation methods are to be used then I think that only one well set up core should be essential, as per Kapanadze.

Consider Dr. Aspden's diagram of an experimental device where there are two capacitors made of concentric plates and the capacitors are arranged at an angle of 60 degrees to each other. Does geometry play a part in the arrangement of Hendershot's device? If so, that could be a part of the answer for two assemblies.

[GSM]

Hendershot capacitor.

Further to my last post relating to possible Beta/charge release by the ferrous cores of the generator, I just pulled out some photographs from an old hard-drive.

This is of the left "capacitor core" (Hendershot's own description) on Art Aho's device, whereafter the capacitor circuit had been redrawn by Crusty in my link last year illustrating a three element component, but was it three foils, and if yes what was their relationship with the central core ?

http://ccs.infospace.com/ClickHandle...8EAF87C2B5553E

Look where the alligator clip is.
I remember thinking last year that Lester must have somehow managed to remove the foil from the capacitor with its tag connection intact, for aluminium foil could not bear the weight of an alligator clip as photographed.

But look where the tag goes to

Is that not directly to the ferrous cylinder core itself ?
Maybe even a tin-plate tag soldered to it ?

A core that would develop a usable charge with respect to an aluminium foil collector-capacitor overwind if magnetically induced electron axis spin waves induce elemental devolution in the ferrous core as I have suggested.

A core that would be a source of serious electric shock if the alligator clip came off or made poor contact as Lester tried to tune the assembly as shown in one photograph - by hand squeezing it !

We'll get one of these things flying yet !

Cheers ........... Graham

[GSM]

As all readers of this thread must have come to realise, I have been striving to understand which fundamental mechanisms might be capable of inducing a release of energy from iron atoms in Hubbard, Hendershot, Mace-Meyer, Don Smith, Kapanadze and Akula designs. Tesla very likely developed a similar equipment which was secreted away by TPTB in exchange for the lifetime payment for his hotel residence and keep. Possibly also Floyd Sweets Magnetic Barium Ferrite Block VTA.

All of these gentlemen's equipments have in common a deeper core polarising field (either DC or low frequency AC), plus a pulsed field. I have suggested that this combination can be arranged to set up a surface spin wave which is gyroscopically capable of forcing electrons out of their atomic orbits to become involved with an electron (K) capture type sequence of events, and releasing energy as iron atoms become devolutionally transmutated into manganese.

Another aspect, and one likely resonance related, is that the release of energy so far seen appears to have a repetitive pulsation quality, as if the energy release builds up to a peak and fades, only to be repeated following the next transient impulse excitation.

I have felt as if I am musing for my own benefit here, for there has been very little feedback or opinion, yet I have continued because it is essential to understand the energy release mechanism involved *before* we can optimise equipments via which to generate it.

I have also come to believe that knowledgeable PTB are exerting peer review influence upon any 'scientific' papers which might inadvertently lead to anyone's discovery of the energy release mechanisms involved, and that not only does this information control relate to censorship, but to deliberate disinfo also. For this reason I have not allowed myself to be influenced by, or sucked into following the unexplained ideas hitherto suggested here by other forum members.

Given that any release of energy from iron via the so called electron capture effect relates to the modification of atomic nucleii, and I am not educated or trained in these matters, my further readings have revealed a related phenomenon used for X-ray and medical purposes previously unknown to me; this being the observation of additionally energised near simultaneous electron releases as a direct consequence of the so called electron capture event.

Hence when an electron impinges a nucleus, not only does the nucleus become modified with attendant energy release, but another electron is also emitted by that atom. That secondarily emitted electron is known as an *Auger Electron*, named after the man who discovered this effect about 75 years ago !

These types of electrons were discovered 10 years before I was born, and yet I had never heard of them before yesterday. Why are we not freely educated about these electrons ?

Auger electron release turns out to be a surface only effect, thus arising exactly where I have suggested that transient field induced electron axis spin vortexes induce abnormal forces upon electrons.

So, just as in nuclear fission where neutrons are the catalysing particle, there could be an externally energised electron fission wave event related to energy release from progressive electron impacts upon nucleii plus electron emission as is necessary to maintain an energy releasing field induced via a domain vortexion event, and this because where an Auger electron is magnetically induced to run in the same direction as the first electron a quantum race of electron waves can start !

Could this relate to Tesla's "wheelwork of nature", whereupon the chain event is sustained by neutrino reversions within non-radioactive atomic nucleii, such that the Fe > Mn devolution is near instantly reversed with continuous bursts of Fe > Mn > Fe > Mn ..... except for one way Fe > Mn occasions where neutrino to nucleus impingement fails to occur, or transduction field overloading becomes disruptive ?

Cheers ........... Graham.

[Bob Smith]

All of these gentlemen's equipments have in common a deeper core polarising field (either DC or low frequency AC), plus a pulsed field. I have suggested that this combination can be arranged to set up a surface spin wave which is gyroscopically capable of forcing electrons out of their atomic orbits to become involved with an electron (K) capture type sequence of events, and releasing energy as iron atoms become devolutionally transmutated into manganese.

Another aspect, and one likely resonance related, is that the release of energy so far seen appears to have a repetitive pulsation quality, as if the energy release builds up to a peak and fades, only to be repeated following the next transient impulse excitation.

I have felt as if I am musing for my own benefit here, for there has been very little feedback or opinion, yet I have continued because it is essential to understand the energy release mechanism involved *before* we can optimise equipments via which to generate it.

Graham, I can only speak for myself here. I'm actively following your posts, and once I got out of the electron-moving-along-a-wire box and considered electrical charge as a precession wave of atomic axial alignment... new and interesting possibilities, explanations seem to be opening up. I can follow, and continue to follow with interest, connecting dots as read other threads on this and other sites. I am sure I'm not alone.

It seems to me that despite the disinfo work in this area, progress is being made. Truth, by its very nature tends toward prevailing. It tends toward coalescence and unity of purpose toward the good, and we are moving in this direction. Truth's obfuscation takes a tremendous amount of ongoing energy. Its (obfuscation of truth's) very nature is entropic and dissipative, and tends toward confusion and abandonment of allegiance. What of lasting value is to be gained from lies? It is tiresome to shore up lies, because they tend toward disunity, fragmentation and find unity only in fear, greed and the false allurements of a kind of power that isolates and leaves one imprisoned in fear and mistrust. Whom can a person involved in disinfo trust? Who would want to live that way? Truth, on the other hand tends toward self-propagation by its very nature. One word, spoken at the right time in truth can cut through a mountain of lies. Truth spoken to power always wins in the end, despite appearences otherwise. We are getting there, and your part is appreciated.
Bob

[GSM]

Whom can a person involved in disinfo trust? Who would want to live that way?

Thank you for your comment Bob.
Sadly our present world is based upon disinfo, and an associated fear for not believing disinfo "just in case" of not receiving 'leadership' controlled confirmational benefits.
Media and an induced "just in case" mindset has become majority pervasive, and it is ruining today's World through over-riding the true spirit that every indivudual should hold dear within their hearts and not allow to be influenced by the induction of fear and greed via an 'expertly informed' peer group.

If anyone wishes to understand the original pre-mainstream Christian, pre-mainstream Islam etc. teachings which were removed from public circulation in exactly same way that 'free'-energy texts have been hidden, might I suggest you read the original teachings of The Twelve as recorded in the Didache of the original Sinai Bible.
The translation is only recent, published 2010, and I immediately purchased a copy, but there has already been a preponderance of 'modern' interpretation and commentary intentionally published to fit in with current disinfo !
Ah - just found a link - The Didache - The Complete Text
Warning - even the opening paragraph links with disinfo.
This text was/is 'free' standing, and from a time when communities made their own, and not any 'Church' organisation dictated, leadership choices. Only those who read it can come to their own conclusion about what is being religiously inculcated today !


When writing about aluminium well over 100 years ago Tesla wrote -
If the molecules are tilted one way then the body is magnetic, if they are tilted the other way the body is non-magnetic.
He also wrote about using copper conductors to make superior transformers without requiring iron (ferrous) cores at all.

I found that it is the solidity of ferrous cores which destroys their usefulness through damping surface electron alignment possibilities in a most significant way.

Last year in the Bob Smith thread I believe it was member kdken who illustrated the identical sparking per turn of his long air spaced copper coils. This arose only at one frequency - a resonant tuning - but what was really being tuned was not a 'flow' of electrons, nor their simplistic magnetic field reversal, but their three dimensional precessional alignments at the skin suface of the coil wire. This was of surface atom electrons synchronously pirouetting over inner purely longitudinal conduction aligned wire atom orbits - energies suddenly in a resonantly induced three dimensional alignment transformation whereupon surface charge flow itself took on a separate identity.

At one frequency the precession (not field alternation) was generating what appeared to be an electron avalanche field; was this due to Auger electrons, and were copper atoms momentarily spin vortexing into nickel with an energy release which was not otherwise being collected ?

As suggested a possibility in my last post, was the all pervasive ambient neutrino flux (not Aether) involved in resetting the nickel back to copper by way of continuous low level change, except for when the rate of excitation exceeded the ambient provision of neutrinos where copper nucleii did irreversibly remain nickel?

Is this a way in which Akula's copper wire could have become attracted by a magnet ?

Also, is there thus some base level of neutrino flux determined rate of conversion which can be sustained indefiniteley before any equipment might overheat and become irreversibly damaged (TH Moray), whereby all we need concern ourselves in relation to reliability is a physical scale, much as over-run standby generators won't last long if overloaded ?

No matter what Bob, you have highlighted from my writing that which I believe is essential regarding our quest for understanding field induced activities at the surface of a Hendershot sleeve core, and why aluminium foil was part of an energised feedback loop collecting and re-charging a magnetic 'buzzer' to release its next magnetic reversal impulse. Nowadays we do not have hands-on dexterities in relation to the construction and tuning of magnetic pulse generators, but then with today's solid state pulsing alternatives we do not need them, nor especially a spark gap either. So whether or not my untrained hypotheses relating to induced electron spin axis vortexing and Auger electron avalanche waves 'fueled' by 'neutrino reversion' are correct or not, I feel that I do have enough information upon which to found Hendershot sleeve core based experiments.

As a final note for now.
There are likely many senior members here who like myself constructed early TRF AM broadcast receivers and used regenarative techniques to increase selectivity and 'sensitivity'. Straightforward tuning coils, whether having a core or not, tended to have a useful resonant Q of ~100, whereafter regeneration could (if not long term stabily) be arranged to boost that up to ~1000 (TH Moray) but not necessarily in a manner which would also improve the s.n.r. due to circuit noise also being a part of the feedback.
Ferrite rod antennas typically have a working Q of 100 too, however a ferrite sleeve antenna can have a natural Q of 1000 using exactly the same rods as used in a Q=100 rod antenna, and this entirely passively !
Where could that take us in the realm of induced vortexion with tuned positive feedback - as Hendershot did ?

This antenna is a working proof that it is the precessionary alignment of electron orbits at the surface of matter which is (also known via the skin effect) most important in relation to electromagnetic energy field concentration and circuit related conversion.

Cheers ................. Graham.