Mr Lester J Hendershot's magnetic generator.

[GSM]

Yesterday evening (whilst painting indoors) I listened to a BBC Radio 4 story via the daughter of Leo Szilard, who on July 4 1934 filed the first patent application for the method of producing a nuclear chain reaction - nuclear explosion.

The program explained how prior to 1938 the idea of fission related to firing a proton into a nucleus, and Leo realised that neutron initiation would be easier. Seems he went to America where another Patent was filed.

BBC News - A Point of View: The man who dreamed of the atom bomb

After the war Leo was not written about in nuclear history, though his co-worker Fermi became well known.

Leo Szilard

So either a proton or a neutron can split an atom and release energy, but then so too can an electron under the guise of 'electron capture' where the electron has been so excited or empowered to overcome orbital forces, this being either by photonic or electro-magneto-gravitationally induced impact !

Though woe would betide any grant funded scientist who publishes such information,
and so the research WE fund via thousands of extremely well paid scientist remains secreted from our benefit !!!!!


Cheers ................ Graham.

[Dave45]

Although Im not a proponent of electrons from atoms, I tend to lean towards aether extraction, polarized ions.
I thought this vid was interesting
Joule Thief: DALM with AG-4 Battery Thermoelectric Effect - YouTube

I do not mean to imply that electrons cannot be extracted from an atom I just dont think this is the only way to free energy, if atomic energy is the path one wants to follow then one should be working with thorium or other radioactive materials and a heating circuit such as the zvs induction heater.
But I believe there is a safer, cleaner way via the aether, ionization of the magnetic field and am working towards this goal.

[thx1138]

Same destination via different routes

It seems we are both moving towards the same conclusion but from different perspectives. In my case I grew weary of all the hype about Tesla's "radiant energy" and decided to go back through his works to see what he actually said rather than what other people said about what he said.

Tesla's view of radiant energy changed over time and where he ended up was what we call today nuclear power. But not nuclear power to generate heat to spin a turbine but nuclear power to directly generate electricity. This method is used today for applications that require long term useage with little or no maintenance. The Russians use RTG's to power lighthouses around the Artic circle because they are hard to access. Another use is in space probes. The Voyager probe that recently left the solar system is power by a nuclear battery. It will operate at a power level sufficient to enable the probe operations for 40+ years with zero maintenance and zero down time. In the case of the space probes they are also engineered to produce heat because the probe needs heat to maintain other equipment on board.

Tesla believed that if radioactive materials could be shielded from cosmic rays they would cease to be radioactive. In that scenario the cosmic rays are the catalyst for radioavtivity. There are different kinds of cosmic rays that are categorized by thier enegy level. Neutrinos are one such category. I tend to think Tesla was correct because he was right about so many things. That led me to thinking about why radioactive materials are radio active and the only explanation I found in current literature is that the atoms are "unstable". That led me to thinking why are they unstable if a body in motion remains in motion and a body at rest remains at rest unless affected by an outside force. Is the energy of the neutrino that outside force which tips the balance in radioactive materials so that they decay? Neutrinos rarely interact with matter but considering their abundance and constancy it seems likely to me that the answer to that question is yes. Keep in mind when thinking of Tesla's work that radioactive materials were not regulated by governments until the 1950's after they had been shown to produce atomic bombs. That may have been also what caused Dr. Moray's problems with MIB also and possibly Mr. Henershot's.
Radioisotope Batteries Take a close look at the page titled "Adding a Dielectric". You'll see it again in the attached document.

As all readers of this thread must have come to realise, I have been striving to understand which fundamental mechanisms might be capable of inducing a release of energy from iron atoms in Hubbard, Hendershot, Mace-Meyer, Don Smith, Kapanadze and Akula designs. ... Possibly also Floyd Sweets Magnetic Barium Ferrite Block VTA.

Why iron? Why not use a material which is less stable or possibly and iron core coated with a radioactive material? Or is the core just the conductor? If so, why use iron?

Don't let the radioactive materials spook you. I believe that fear instilled in us is part of the disinformation campaign. Low level radioactive materials can be aquired over the internet without a license. It's the highly processed materials that are dangerous. In fact there is debate now about the level of radiation that is dangerous. There seems to be a threshold level that was ignored when the standards were set.
Toxicologist Says NAS Panel 'Misled the World' When Adopting Radiation Exposure Guidelines

Materials: United Nuclear Images Scientific Instruments

All of these gentlemen's equipments have in common a deeper core polarising field (either DC or low frequency AC), plus a pulsed field. I have suggested that this combination can be arranged to set up a surface spin wave which is gyroscopically capable of forcing electrons out of their atomic orbits to become involved with an electron (K) capture type sequence of events, and releasing energy as iron atoms become devolutionally transmutated into manganese.

Another thing they have in common is that they haven't been successfully replicated that I know of.

Another aspect, and one likely resonance related, is that the release of energy so far seen appears to have a repetitive pulsation quality, as if the energy release builds up to a peak and fades, only to be repeated following the next transient impulse excitation.

That, I believe, is the essence of Tesla's "disruptive discharge". One pulse in a primary, immediately terminated, sets up a ringing pulse in a secondary and as the secondary rings down energy can be captured while no energy is being expended in the primary. That's why the fall time of the pulse in the primary is so important, hence the use of the spark gap. In Tesla's time the spark gap was the diode of the day and the magnetically quenched spark gap gave the fast pulse fall time needed. Another aspect of the spark gap is that it can be truly unidirectional while modern semiconductors always have some reverse leakage.

I have felt as if I am musing for my own benefit here, for there has been very little feedback or opinion, yet I have continued because it is essential to understand the energy release mechanism involved *before* we can optimise equipments via which to generate it.

I agree whole heartedly. That's why I went back to study the source as noted above.

I have also come to believe that knowledgeable PTB are exerting peer review influence upon any 'scientific' papers which might inadvertently lead to anyone's discovery of the energy release mechanisms involved, and that not only does this information control relate to censorship, but to deliberate disinfo also. For this reason I have not allowed myself to be influenced by, or sucked into following the unexplained ideas hitherto suggested here by other forum members.

I agree whole heartedly again. So does Harold Aspden because he was one of the many victims of that censorship. While it is easy to get side tracked, the flip side of that is you are missing other people's experiences. You really should look at his work. Here's one of the simple questions he poses: where does a "field" store its energy? You really owe it to yourself to take a look at his work. He is a theoretical physicist but don't let the math side track you. Read his texts for the underlying meaning.
Ten Tutorial Lessons

Hence when an electron impinges a nucleus, not only does the nucleus become modified with attendant energy release, but another electron is also emitted by that atom. That secondarily emitted electron is known as an *Auger Electron*, named after the man who discovered this effect about 75 years ago !

Thank you for that. I had not heard of it either. It answers one of the things I've been looking at: what happens when you coat the insulated, elevated plate of Tesla's radiant energy patent with a low level radioactive material. As a test I was going to make such a plate and use an old radio vacuum tube that emits soft x-rays covered in a lead shield with a slit or hole in it to focus the x-rays on the plate. Tesla's patent says the plate is "amalgamated" but he didn't say what as in the amalgamation.

Also note that the Auger electron process also is said to sometimes create photons. That may account for the glow observed in some experiments like in Stan Myer's energy cells. Stan Meyers Secret

Could this relate to Tesla's "wheelwork of nature", whereupon the chain event is sustained by neutrino reversions within non-radioactive atomic nucleii, such that the Fe > Mn devolution is near instantly reversed with continuous bursts of Fe > Mn > Fe > Mn ..... except for one way Fe > Mn occasions where neutrino to nucleus impingement fails to occur, or transduction field overloading becomes disruptive ?

At the time Tesla made his "wheelwork of nature" statement he was looking outward to the universe, not inward to subatomic processes. That was in 1892 and the atom was still believed at that time to be the indivisible minimum of matter.

RE the "Fe > Mn > Fe > Mn ..... " process, ask yourself if the Fe>Mn process is triggered by the Auger electron what triggers that Mn>Fe process. I think Aspden's work can answer that question for you.

I find interesting your take on the skin effect. During my explorations on the subject it occurred to me that most of the interesting effects occur at the boundaries of different things. A thermocouple in a water heater generates electricity at the boundary between the iron and copper components. I suspect this plays a larger part in John Bedini's work than most people realize - the coil cores are made of copper coated welding rods. The boundary between a plasma and the gas surrounding it has some interesting properties and the "pinch effect" has been shown to occur in lightning and in cosmological circumstances. See Hannes Alfven's work on the latter. alfven triumphs again and again

I have attached what I have written up on Tesla's work on radiant energy. It still needs work. Hopefully it will trigger some thoughts for you.

[thx1138]

Thermoelectric effect

Although Im not a proponent of electrons from atoms, I tend to lean towards aether extraction, polarized ions.
I thought this vid was interesting
Joule Thief: DALM with AG-4 Battery Thermoelectric Effect - YouTube

Most likely it is the thermoelectric effect. The thermocouple of a gas water heater works the same way. Electricity is generated at the interface between the copper and iron components when the thermocouple is heated. The thermocouple is an output only device. There is no other electrical connection. When the pilot light is lit and heating the thermocouple, the presence of the electricity at the controller tells it that it is OK to open the gas valve to light the main burner. If the pilot light is lit and the main burner won't light, the thermocouple has gone bad. I've had this occur and replacing the thermocouple fixed it. I don't know enough about battery construction to know if that is the case in this instance but I think so since there is an interface between the electrodes and electrolyte which are two different materials or the elctrodes could be copper plated with something else which could cause the thermoelectric effect.

There are two other things happening in the video but I don't know enough about the JT circuit to know if they have an affect. Heat increases the resistance in the wire connection and holding the unisulated aligator clip increases the capacitance.

[GSM]

Why iron? Why not use a material which is less stable or possibly and iron core coated with a radioactive material? Or is the core just the conductor? If so, why use iron?

Iron/ferrite is unique in that it has a wave motion to its magnetisation, and thus electron spin axis alignments within are quite different to those on the surface. The centre core can be polarised as like an Earth ground to the electron gyroscopes spinning on its surface.
Professor Eric Laithwaite gives a demonstration of a large gyro wheel - YouTube
Spinning matter either "as light as a feather" - or - as heavy as bedamned;
with effective 'weight' dependent upon direction of axial rotation (polarity of impulse coil energisation) wrt ground (DC or slow AC magnetically polarised centre core); this inducing so called 'electron capture' + energetic release + Auger electron release, for positive electrical feedback plus output.

Why iron - governments cannot ban iron/tin cans !
If radioactive materials were legal (to order through the mail) then I would try to use them the same as Paul Brown did and (died in a strange car crash) Patented for the military, lighthouse and Satellite type 'batteries' you mention.

I find interesting your take on the skin effect. During my explorations on the subject it occurred to me that most of the interesting effects occur at the boundaries of different things.

Yes; at the edges of magnetic domains in iron/steel/stainless.
Or tin plate boundaries on steel cans. Or tin plate boundaries on tinned copper wire instead of pure copper.

RE the "Fe > Mn > Fe > Mn ..... " process, ask yourself if the Fe>Mn process is triggered by the Auger electron what triggers that Mn>Fe process.

I suggested neutrinos; possibly nucleus imbalance during 'electron capture' invokes unavoidable neutrino interaction, much as with the decay of radioactive materials.

Thank you for the links, much appreciated, will follow them shortly.

Looking at your Tesla Radiant Energy paper, I have got as far as his "age 32" Patent, and I couldn't help but think that his drawing looked similar to this reality -
Solar Wind Prediction
(As of this date of upload, thank goodness the Sun missed again.)

Back soon .................. Graham.

[GSM]

I have attached what I have written up on Tesla's work on radiant energy. It still needs work. Hopefully it will trigger some thoughts for you.

Re Patent age 44.
These notes have an identical basis to those published by Gustav LeBon in his 'Evolution of Matter' book ! (I think 1907) If you read this text you will very quickly realise that this is not only about the evolution of matter, but the basis for the atomic devolution of matter, and that this be possible via EM at frequencies exceeding UV-C.

This of course being where we can cause the very atoms of matter, via their electrons, to become the initiating source of UV>X-ray frequencies within an arrangement of surroundings.

Gustav measured the 'wavelengths' of UV light via electric arc and different types of quartz filters, plus used his electroscope to measure/tabulate the charge effects upon sheet aluminium, plus many other materials including tin and zinc.

He found that what we now call UV-A had a small effect, UV-B more, UV-5 more still and frequencies beyond even greater.
He reported that in outside daylight the aluminium charge disturbance measured by electroscope deflection increased with sunlight and lack of clouds, but he also noted changes of reading which were beyond those explainable by visually observable conditions ! Cosmic rays/ neutrinos ?

Hendershot !!!!!

Cheers ................... Graham.

txh1138 I am so very busy at present, so it will take me some time to get to all of those links in your post above.
You can see how little I have progressed through your own paper. Thanks.

I do hope that other subscribers and visitors here read through your work and all of the recommended links in this thread too.

[GSM]

Hi thx1138.

Thank you for your PDF text with final synopsis.

My thoughts are as yours/ Tesla's.

In this regard the Hendershot generator sleeve was (via a magnetic vortex) being induced to emit radioactively. The sleeve was wrapped by an insulator, then a metal (aluminium) collector around that, which developed charge as it stopped the emitted particles.
This alternating charge was then phase shifted via coil resonance and fed back to intensify the magnetic vortex, which was additionally increased via the external load current simultaneously passing through the vortex generating windings.

Did Hendershot get there before Tesla, or did Hendershot become priveledged to Tesla information after his magnetic motor empowered the Spirit of St Louis aeroplane flight across the Atlantic except for a conventionally fueled take-off ?

Will check out your other links now, starting with Tutorial Lessons.
Again; Thank You !

Cheers ................. Graham.

[thx1138]

Solar Wind Prediction web site

I decided to go back to the beginning of this thread and work forward to catch up on what I've missed so it's been a while since I posted. I'm starting page 7 now. Also doing some work on my daughter's house so my posts might be few and far between for a while.

That Solar Wind Prediction web site is a very cool animation. I've been looking at space weather in regards to Tesla's Radiant Energy collector and have found some interesting results. The major problem I'm having now is grasping the entire dynamic picture. That site shows the charged particles of the solar wind but that's just one aspect of what is going on dynamically. There's also the magnetic fields associated with charged particles and overall the light being emitted by the sun at the same time. The thing I noticed is that there is an inverse correlation between the solar wind and the charge on my radiant energy collector - the higher the density of the solar wind charged particles, the lower the received charge. One would think it should be opposite of that but I realized all of that matter being cast off by the sun is diffusing or absorbing some of the light energy being emitted. The correlation I did was with X-rays and it was fairly close but out of 50+ observations there were a few outliers that didn't fit the curve so I guess there are other aspects to consider also.

There's a lot of current and historical space weather info at the following link and the links in that page.
SpaceWeather.com -- News and information about meteor showers, solar flares, auroras, and near-Earth asteroids

But to grasp the whole dynamic picture you also have to show the earth revolving around the sun and rotating on its axis at the same time and the varying magnetic field of the earth generated by the Coriolis effect whirls in the liquid iron outer core. And then throw the magnetic, electrical, and gravity properties of the sun, earth, moon, and other planets and their moons into the picture and it gets truly mind numbing. At least for me. Of course you can go further out like galaxies and cosmic rays, etc and further in to the molecular and atomic levels. That's how I view the universe, both macro and micro. An infinitely variable fractal on all scales. I got into fractals and chaos theory back in the 90's and decided there is no such thing as chaos. Everything has a pattern given the proper perspective. Simply put, if chaos was the fundamental property of the universe then organization of matter and energy could not exist.

The solar wind animation triggered something in my brain and I went back to look at Tesla's turbine and those spiral shapes also represent the path taken by the working fluid across the disks in the turbine. There are some interesting statements in his patent:

"The subject of this application is an invention pertaining to the art of imparting energy to fluids..." (the solar wind, the atmosphere and any plasma, for that matter, can be considered a fluid); and "...the particles of the fluid..." (particle accelerator?)

And I had a thought about pumping a magneic fluid with a Tesla turbine, the disks being conductive or pumping a conductive fluid and the disks being magnetic. I'm getting a bit far afield here.

Back to Hendershot. In reading the prior posts I noted a few things that might shed some light although you may have already covered them. I haven't caught up all the way.

Stainless steel can be magnetic or non-magnetic depending on how it is manufactured. This would relate to your surface spin idea. The following link explains the atomic structure of the two different types. The second paragraph is of interest. I'm not far along enough to know if this would impact your work but thought I would mention it.
Why don't magnets work on some stainless steels?

Another thing that crossed my mind was parametric oscillation which is, as I understand it, is a non-linear output effect of changing charge density in a capacitive device, meaning a small change in density can make a large change in output in a non-linear fashion. Might this apply to the capacitor positioned in the center of the basket weave coils, the charge density reacting to the oscillations of the magnetic field?

Which brings me to the subject of "magnetic reconnection" which apparently generates energy spikes that may draw extra energy from the medium of the environment. I'll leave that for you to search because I need to get back to work on my daughter's house.

[thx1138]

Rotating magnetic field

The year 1928 is interesting as it is related to the Hendershot device. The following is from a 1928 interview with Tesla:
"Toward the end of the interview, we asked Tesla which arena of science most appealed to him. While we expected him to mention radios and airplanes, Tesla answered that rotating magnetic fields were dear to his heart. 'A thousand years hence, the telephone and the motion picture camera may be obsolete, but the principle of the rotating magnetic field will remain a vital, living thing for all time to come.'" Full article at the following link
Archive Gallery: 10 Renowned Scientists Make Their PopSci Debut

Do the basket weave coils have a rotating magnetic field that sloshes the charge around in the internally mounted capacitors and so change the charge density?

[GSM]

Stainless steel can be magnetic or non-magnetic depending on how it is manufactured. This would relate to your surface spin idea. The following link explains the atomic structure of the two different types. The second paragraph is of interest. I'm not far along enough to know if this would impact your work but thought I would mention it.
Why don't magnets work on some stainless steels?

Just catching up myself thx1138.
Apart from helping out at my son's house I had been sharing ideas on the Don Smith thread, but I need to get back here.

Re your Tesla (top ten) link, strange that there was no mention of his Pierce Arrow energy box ! I think that what we read depends upon who is publishing !

Thank you for that stainless steel link. At least someone else writes about rotating magnetic domiains, so I feel less of a lone beacon.
Magnetism is an alignment of electron orbits, thus rotating magnetic domains means rotating the axes of the electron orbits within matter in response to an external field.
Then when taking this another step forwards, spinning the magnetic field causes the electron orbit axes to spin as well, this inducing considerable forces upon individual electrons within domains.

Morpher has already made many video based examinations of the Hendershot generator, but I am not aware of him examining a completed construction, which, now that I understand what I am supposed to be achieving, I am going to try for myself, even down to the level of winding/construsting my own magnetic induction (buzzer) assembly.

Still not read your earlier links yet. Have come to Harold Aspden discussing the Aether, and that is a turn-off before I start.
I lived an early diet of radio/electronics and knew the 2" thick RSGB manual inside out before I realised that there was misguidance regarding fields and EM propagation.
Hence before I do more reading I need to do some measurements on the capacity value for foil over a tin can, especially since I posted that last photo of *the central tin can sleeve core core carrying an electrical connection*.
Was the 7,800pF a can to long aluminium foil value ?
Then 1.3uF the value between the short lengths ?
Again something has been most inadequately explained here, especially if the foil is transducing either beta or photonic emissions from the can/ stainless steel sleeve core and feeding that energy back into the circuit to maintain oscillation and output.

Cheers ............... Graham.

[thx1138]

Rethinking gospel

Re your Tesla (top ten) link, strange that there was no mention of his Pierce Arrow energy box !

There's really not much to say about the box. The tubes that are stated to have been used didn't exist until much later and the whole story is shaky enough to make it dubious at best. One thing that has always bothered me about it was the statement about the "normal" auto controls being used. How was speed controlled? What was connected to the gas pedal? Nary a hint in all the info I've seen.

Have come to Harold Aspden discussing the Aether, and that is a turn-off before I start.

That's too bad. He basically is saying, in regard to your work, that the energy released in the Fe->Mn transition is stored in the aether and when the aether equalizes its energy level, the energy from the Fe->Mn transition that was absorbed by the aether is fed back into the Mn->Fe transition.

I have a friend that has been a ham operator for over 50 years and he has the same problems with over unity and perpetual motion. He can't kick all that previous radio training either. It is his gospel. Yet when I mention to him that the movement of an electron never stops and is therefore perpetual motion, he's stumped.

It tickles me how many times on these forums the posters are looking for "alternative energy sources" and trying to find them through conventional thinking. They start off with a new idea and immediately revert to conventional thinking citing Maxwell, et al and it never seems to go anywhere except around in circles. And these are usually the same people who think that knowledge and inventions are being suppressed but won't look at alternative explanations. It's like pounding a square peg into a round hole.

RE aether: Where does an energy "field" store its energy? What medium is storing that energy?

[GSM]

Tesla car -

How was speed controlled? What was connected to the gas pedal?

Tubes were oscillator. Throttle controlled frequency over a working rev range.
Car had clutch and gearbox, and possible different rear axle gearing.

He {Harold Aspden} basically is saying, in regard to your work, that the energy released in the Fe->Mn transition is stored in the aether and when the aether equalizes its energy level, the energy from the Fe->Mn transition that was absorbed by the aether is fed back into the Mn->Fe transition.

RE aether: Where does an energy "field" store its energy? What medium is storing that energy?

Intra-nucleus relationships with orbiting electrons ARE the storage of energy in space-time; whilst gravity/ electric charge/ magnetics balance those energies within and around atoms/ matter.
Isotopes have typical lifetimes before retaining stability via action from the all pervasive neutrino flux, which is not a field but a constant flow from nuclear reactions within stars/ Sun etc.

The Aether has been deemed an essential medium, even reactive, or reflective; but neutrinos are atomic particles, which are none of those, nor some kind of field either.

Thus where any atom might emit a neutrino, this has nothing to do with the donation of a neutrino from somewhere else, for they are not stored in any 'Aether' and then returned.

Yet when I mention to him that the movement of an electron never stops and is therefore perpetual motion, he's stumped.

BRAVO !

Cheers ................... Graham.

[GSM]

Getting back here from the Don Smith thread (I gave up in that thread last year, and ditto this!), where I have shared ideas related to my understanding of the Hendershot device with its similarly opposing magnetic fields;

opposing electron spin orbit alignments induce a floating skin effect within magnetic centre core region domains which become re-aligned with induced resultant circumferential field rotation (in Hendershot this is induced via capacitor induced phase shift in a near centre winding, and not via a spark gap impulse) -

the mechanical central skin domain region electron orbit motions are like those demonstrated in this clever ring based construction video I just came across -
https://youtube.googleapis.com/v/NI2N6fsPjjg

electrons are induced to circumnavigate backwards and forwards in alternating spin waves at output frequency like little gyroscopes, and thereby have imposed upo them atomic orbit-breaking forces as illustrated here -
Professor Eric Laithwaite gives a demonstration of a large gyro wheel - YouTube

such that they collide with other core nucleii with electron capture = Fe to Mn isotope transmutation (near identical atomic weight) and Beta release, also collide with other electrons to release Auger electron avalanches, with Auger electrons also amenable to field acceleration and direction.

In Post#387 above I included a photograph showing a left core-cap with a tag making direct electrical connection with the inner ferrous core.
I also indicated my puzzlement at the stated capacitance values for Hendershot's hand wound capacitors wound directly over that centre core. Different capacitance values have been quoted, but there is no way the 96" long by 2.75" wide element mentioned could have had a capacitance value as low as the 7.8nF.

I was going to construct my own tin can capacitor overwind and measure with a capacitance meter, but do not have any of the 'pure Kraft paper' and a tin can the same size as Lester used and as was stated in original notes.

Hence I decided to use a web based capacitance calculator -
Tesla Coils - Capacitance Calculator

An inner core 5.25" dia. gives a length of 16.5", by 2.75 inches high for width.
For Kraft paper and first insulation layer I have estimated a 5 thou plate spacing.
For dielectric constant I have estimated and entered 3.5.
When the number of platesis 2, and the dimensions are in inches,
the estimated capacitance of the first core-cap turn came out as 0.007139uF.

Clearly this is in the ballpark of 7.8nF, and PROVES that the centre core itself must have been circuit connected, for otherwise, and without its own tag connection, that figure would not even have been measureable.

So were there other capacitor elements, if yes what for, and how were they really connected ?

Cheers ................ Graham.

[MACFIRE]

Hendershot Fuel Less Generator

I urgently need advice on the building of the Hendershot Generator.

I obtained the information from the Net and Built it accordingly:

Three things needs clarification:

1. Would the use of 6mm dowl sticks instead of 3mm dowls sticks prevent the machine from working.
2. What is the correct rating of the transformers to be used? In the manual it only said 1/5 ratio but nothing about the VA rating. I am using 2x 500VA rated transformers and need to know if this is far to big and if so what should the correct VA rating be to make the unit work?
3. The Video of the build is **** to say the least thus leaving me to guess the correct wiring of the unit according the circuit diagram. Can any body please help with some better photos.

[GSM]

I obtained the information from the Net and Built it accordingly:

Three things needs clarification:

Can any body please help with some better photos.

Hi Macfire,

Don't let the *CON MERCHANTS* take advantage of your mind again.

Three things ? If only ! Even people who possess devices that once worked can't get them to run again.
No one is known to have built a functional Hendershot generator since Lester died over 50 years ago.

If you want 'free energy' follow Akula and Kapanadze via YouTube !!!

Otherwise good info and photos here -

http://www.rexresearch.com/hendersho...rchivesLJH.pdf
http://library.liberaenergio.org/fil...t_in_Farbe.doc

Much more is available, but be on the watchout for wilful disinfo repeated by those who do not understand.
Also ignore anyone attemting to explain/study this via the use of circuit simulators;

Lester's Magnatronic Generator did NOT run via any published/software translatable "scientific" process !!!

Cheers ................. Graham.