You Guys realize what we have been doing so far?
Hello to All,
By reading and understanding this Patent...we should be able to realize/understand "How We have been Generating Electricity so far?"
And it is simple...all the -so far- existing Generators Designs have "Incorporated" Always, the Induced Coils/Generating Fields Built/Wound within the SAME CORE of One of the Two Exciters, either Rotary or Static....And -of course- this Design minimizes a LOT the Air Gap...but at what price?
Eventually, the "Stiffness" that a Generator develop under High Loads, (Stiffness that only a Gas/Diesel Engine could turn, so far) is NOT DUE to the Induced Copper Windings...BUT, it is due to the Increase in the Magnetic Field Drag/Strength demanded from this generating fields to their respective Exciters...
If We set this Two Exciters Static/Fixed...and just rotate the generating copper windings...no matter how much demand/loads we hook to that Generator with...it will result in a super strong Magnetic Fields between them...BUT FIXED...while our Copper/Plastic spinning rotor and shaft will never get "stiff" again...not "stressing" our Prime Mover.
Reason why Clemente Figuera cites that... "Even a weak motor could turn this Generator..."
If We have to deal with a "Bigger Air Gap" in this new concept design...then we could either Increase the Exciters Field Strength...or Increase the RPM's...or both...in order to achieve the Required Outputs...We can easily do them all without any "stressful stiff drag"
Or, as a final gathering, We could Pulse the Exciters Independently by Pairs (Inner-Outer)...in a Sequential Fashion...while we spin the rotor...Then we "fuse" both Patents in just One...
Either way...We will win...
Regards
Ufopolitics
Hello to All,
By reading and understanding this Patent...we should be able to realize/understand "How We have been Generating Electricity so far?"
And it is simple...all the -so far- existing Generators Designs have "Incorporated" Always, the Induced Coils/Generating Fields Built/Wound within the SAME CORE of One of the Two Exciters, either Rotary or Static....And -of course- this Design minimizes a LOT the Air Gap...but at what price?
Eventually, the "Stiffness" that a Generator develop under High Loads, (Stiffness that only a Gas/Diesel Engine could turn, so far) is NOT DUE to the Induced Copper Windings...BUT, it is due to the Increase in the Magnetic Field Drag/Strength demanded from this generating fields to their respective Exciters...
If We set this Two Exciters Static/Fixed...and just rotate the generating copper windings...no matter how much demand/loads we hook to that Generator with...it will result in a super strong Magnetic Fields between them...BUT FIXED...while our Copper/Plastic spinning rotor and shaft will never get "stiff" again...not "stressing" our Prime Mover.
Reason why Clemente Figuera cites that... "Even a weak motor could turn this Generator..."
If We have to deal with a "Bigger Air Gap" in this new concept design...then we could either Increase the Exciters Field Strength...or Increase the RPM's...or both...in order to achieve the Required Outputs...We can easily do them all without any "stressful stiff drag"
Or, as a final gathering, We could Pulse the Exciters Independently by Pairs (Inner-Outer)...in a Sequential Fashion...while we spin the rotor...Then we "fuse" both Patents in just One...
Either way...We will win...
Regards
Ufopolitics
Comment