Joseph Papp, Air Inert Gas Design, by Heinz Klostermann

[tutanka]

the hard thing to do is control exactly the ionization state of each element.. 7 billion people on this planet no one has figured this out or am I just plain wrong?

Yes all are wrong probably all think difficult or all think using the same mode.. I have tested this process hundred of times and work every time without problems.

When the ionization is reached the process start automatically!!

My video isn't an fake .. is real and working experiment .. The video was shot in the dark because the flame can not be seen in the light

[wolf234]

thank alex, good book

[tutanka]

thank alex, good book

It's a miracle if you have found the nitrogen fission book

[tachyon]

do you consider the nucleus to be a point charge ?

[tutanka]

do you consider the nucleus to be a point charge ?

Sorry.. don't understand.. please explain better your concept

[tachyon]

if making air into positive ions works better then the nucleus should be considered to be a point charge... now when is your book coming out? klostermann makes nitrogen positive ions and oxygen negative ions (does not remove total electrons inside) .. am I correct? thats why he needs half a kilovolt.

[tutanka]

if making air into positive ions works better then the nucleus should be considered to be a point charge... now when is your book coming out? klostermann makes nitrogen positive ions and oxygen negative ions (does not remove total electrons inside) .. am I correct? thats why he needs half a kilovolt.

No correct.. Air can't be in part negative or positive.. or you add or you remove electrons.

[tachyon]

I meant that in the same volumetric space there is the same amount of electrons, am I correct?...

[tutanka]

I meant that in the same volumetric space there is the same amount of electrons, am I correct?...

Sorry don't understand... probably you are more advance respect to me

[tachyon]

sorry alex I have not put the question correctly but what I said is not important as long as you have done this in your experiments you can deduce a theory from your experiments and not wait for experimental validation of other theories which can lead you to a wrong way.

[tutanka]

sorry alex I have not put the question correctly but what I said is not important as long as you have done this in your experiments you can deduce a theory from your experiments and not wait for experimental validation of other theories which can lead you to a wrong way.

My experiment prove at 100% that theory is right and that is very important step to the future.

[pmazz850]

@Tutanka,
Sorry for the confusion of the two different devices. I understand now.
In the video, is that just air? Or air + another fuel, like hho?
I have went over the autothermia papers and its very interesting.

Regards.

[tutanka]

@Tutanka,
Sorry for the confusion of the two different devices. I understand now.
In the video, is that just air? Or air + another fuel, like hho?
I have went over the autothermia papers and its very interesting.

Regards.

Every time the same concept ..you can use what you want.. you need plasma and free electrons, if you reach that condition you burn air!!

[Stephen Brown]

Proof of Concept...

Tutanka,
Let me ask the big question.
How can we make a "Proof of Concept" reactor.
Buy your book or ????
Are you sharing your reactor as "Open-Source"?
Thanks
Stephen

[tutanka]

Tutanka,
Let me ask the big question.
How can we make a "Proof of Concept" reactor.
Buy your book or ????
Are you sharing your reactor as "Open-Source"?
Thanks
Stephen

The technology presented on video http://www.air4gas.com is patent pending.

If you are interested to use this technology please contact belgium company for license agreement.