The magnificence of 3, 6, 9

[SilverToGold]

And not one that says anything about 3,6 & 9.

If there were, it would have been quoted somewhere and sourced.

I just Googled ' "magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9" Nikola Tesla Information Resource | Books and Online Files ' and guess what I found.... NOTHING!

No goo way to search through these ... but there
is a lot of good material here written by Tesla:

Selected Tesla Writings -- Table of Contents

[Michelinho]

Hi SilverToGold,

Try the same search with the search engine Gibiru, you will get a few hits:
Anonymous Search Engine

Google, not what it once was.

Take care,

Michel

[MasterBlaster]

I started a new thread which might interest you:

Gematria

[SilverToGold]

Thanks Michel but still nothing. And it's not up to me to find a non-existent quote of Tesla.... it's up to those who claim Tesla said this to show the proof.

But no one can.

Hi SilverToGold,

Try the same search with the search engine Gibiru, you will get a few hits:
Anonymous Search Engine

Google, not what it once was.

Take care,

Michel

[morpher44]

SATOR Square

http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l2...igmatic528.jpg

My translation:

"Wash - Rinse - Repeat"...

--morpher44

[thx1138]

Another Tesla quote

In searching for the 3, 6, 9 quote I found another supposed quote from Tesla
but can't seem to find a citation:

“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.”

It seems I have seen this one before but can't find it in any of my searchable docs. Anyone?

[Beamgate]

In searching for the 3, 6, 9 quote I found another supposed quote from Tesla
but can't seem to find a citation:

“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.”

It seems I have seen this one before but can't find it in any of my searchable docs. Anyone?

Courtesy of the ongoing Studies of Walter Russell:

3 = Divine Trinity
6 = (Still grasping this one)
9 = The finite elements of the Octave

Seek and Know

[thx1138]

Wrong

Courtesy of the ongoing Studies of Walter Russell:

3 = Divine Trinity
6 = (Still grasping this one)
9 = The finite elements of the Octave

Does Russel have a citation for the Tesla quote?

I'm not looking for the meaning. I'm looking for citations to documents where Tesla actually said either of these quotes. There are thousands and thousands of references on the internet but as yet I haven't found a single one that has a citation. Google says "About 640,000" hits. All of the ones I've looked at that have a source listed is just a reference to some other web site.

IF Tesla said it, then it will make sense within the context of that document. Without the context it means nothing - it's gibberish that people make up to invoke Tesla's name and tie themselves to him in some misguided way.

Here are the quotes again:
"If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6, and 9, then you would have a key to the universe."

“If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration.”

[Beamgate]

@thx

Wrong? To KNOW the meaning of such a thing contradicts your query. You seek the answer, yet my investigation is clearly wrong? I suggest we are both seeking a similar thing and neither is yet correct on this day! Join me in the chase before you show your KNOWING.

I have seen it (Tesla:369) 'referenced' at least three times and in all cases there is little context with which to draw upon. Not surprising.

That prompted me to look beyond the press snippets.

Seek further in Russell.

After much research -- Russell and Tesla conversed on occasion, but upon what dates is not all that clear. But, Tesla did warn that "humanity was likely not yet ready for Russell's message of Creation and the truth behind our Reality".

And I would tend to agree!

Man has much to do to ensure his longevity.

For me, Russell's message of the Creator(One) and We is indeed resounding.

[ewizard]

"the 3, 6 and 9 represent the conduits/pathways that force (energy/information) manifest through to form materia

the other number 1,2,4,5,7,8 represent the already manifested ingredients of materia

thus the structure of all things material is dependent on the sequence/pattern force takes via the 3,6 and 9 conduits

the sequence changes to form the pulses (wave(s)) force found forming and supporting all things commonly known as field (s)
--------------------

Everyone concentrates on the 3,6,9. But you still need the other numbers to create the 3,6,9 magnetic flux line. Got a calculator? How about the magical number 142857
Take 142857x2= 285714. The base numbers are still there just rearranged. Try 142857x3=428571. See a pattern?
Continue going through 1-9 and write down your results for each number. When you get to the number 7 something strange happens. 142857x7=999999!
(Notes by me ewizard: 142857 x 8 = 1142856 - first time 6 shows up! - also note first and last digits of result are 7 - so back to the same number 142857. Then multiply 142857 x 9 = 1285713 - first time '3' shows up! and note the last two digits of that number 3 +1 = 4 so back to the same digits 128574!)
Look at the Rodin coil wiring and see the current paths of 1,4,2,8,5,7. The 3,6,9, is the magnetic flux lines.
You are the 3,6,9. We live in 3 dimensions...3,6,9.
The 142857 represents all the other dimensions. The energy flow from one universe to another is the current flow/events. Your current reality is the combination of all those events manifesting as the magnetic flux line/reality as we know it, here. Now if you throw Time into the loop, it gets really strange. Imagine the 1,4,2,8,5,7 current flows as possible events and the 3, 6, 9, as what we saw happening here. Time is a loop that twists and returns to its current position through different paths...the 142857. Time runs in a twisted Loop. Don't believe me? Grab your calculator again.
Try this one: 22/7= 3.142857...notice anything similar?
This is the number of PI. It is used to calculate the circumference of a circle and also the volume.
The number 3,6,9 is the manifestation of the 1,4,2,8,5,7. Now to really confuse you and open your minds, realize that the energy from 1,4,2,8,5,7, can flow in both directions! When energy is pushed in a direction/current flow, an opposite and equal energy flow is created to take its place. Essentially a vacuum is created. The anti/opposite energy flow can go past the other currents without interfering. Each one on it's own path. Without the negative energy and opposite directional flow, the energy flow that you can measure, would not exist. You need a bidirectional path to create a current flow. To fully understnd this you would need to read up on Ed Leedskalin. He truly knew the power of 3,6,9 and the 142857.
This is such advanced thinking in it's simplest form.
Yes correct, if One only truly understood the magnificence of the 3,6,9! I do. And if you truly understood also, what I have written, this should be a major WOW to you!
Bidirectional Flow....think on it. And apply it to time, yourself, energy flow, life, everything! Then you maybe can start to grasp the true power of the 3,6,9.

-------------------------

Yes Marko Rodin has indeed discovered natures secret about 3,6, and 9.
We have to cast out all 9's.

What does that mean? It means that any number that is above the value 9 or one place value is going to be added together to get a single digit.

So this means if we have a number 26, we add 2+6 to get 8, which is its "archetype". If we do this for all numbers while doubling and halving, we get a pattern.


This. The secret to the Universe is DOUBLING and HALVING.

Let's double the number 1 and found out what pattern we get.

1 1
2 2
4 4
8 8
16 7 (1+6=7)
32 5 (3+2=5)

64 1 (6+4=10, 1+0=1)
128 2 (1+2+8=11, 1+1=2)
256 4 (2+5+6=13, 1+3=4)
512 8 (5+1+2=8)
1024 7 (1+0+2+4=7)
2048 5 (2+0=4+8=14, 1+4=5)

Actually, every 6 sets repeats into infinity in this way.

You can also do the same by halving, or dividing the 1 into many parts.

Anyway.. there is more, like how 3,6, and 9 are never present amongst other numbers in the double scheme.

3
6
12 (1+2=3)
24 (2+4=6)
48 (4+8=12, 1+2=3)
96 (9+6=15, 1+5=6)

3 and 6's are constantly oscilating back and forth between each other in the doubling and halving scheme.

Now let's double 9.


9
18 (1+8=9)
27 (2+7=9)
36 (3+6=9)
45 (4+5=9)
54 etc. starts over backwards here.
63
72
81
90
99


So 9 is the unchanging, unwavering number that never really loses its true identity, even though it is undergoing a constant state changing.


You would do best to watch Marko Rodins videos and just try to understand what he's saying.

Basically he's found the math to the real "God Particle" or particle of Spirit, known as Brahman in the Vedas, and he has shown how it can be observed, but not with physical instruments.


---------------------------------

1/7=.142857 there are so many patterns, but my
2/7=.285714 favorite are the hidden 3,6, and 9's
3/7=.428571
4/7=.571428
5/7=.714285
6/7=.857142

------------------------
Solfeggio frequencies:
396
417
528
639
741
852


3+9+6=1+8= 9

4+1+7=1+2= 3

5+2+8=1+5= 6

6+3+9=1+8= 9

7+4+1=1+2= 3

8+5+2=1+5= 6

----------------------
"It is through the disturbance of this oscillatory equilibrium, by means of resonant impulses, that Keely alters the relations of the vibratory impulses which constitute matter. This he does by striking the same chord in three octaves, representing the third, sixth, and ninth of the scale.
Quoting: John Keely"


All the above was gleaned from 4 pages of posts on godlikeproductions.com. I think Tesla being the genius he was probably came to his 3,6,9 statement based on info similar to the that in the posts above.

[Beamgate]

Thank you @ewizard for that!

I had studied Rodin's numerology and noted the other works you've quoted a couple years ago. A valuable summary indeed - for this thread in particular! There is some of Leedskalin buried in all that as well I've noted.

After reviewing @thx's earlier post, I may have misinterpreted his query. If he is not seeking anything more than cited Tesla references to 369, then I'll apologize for the extraneous banter.

[logos]

i am in the process of reading tesla now and am looking out for these 2 quotes.

if the origin does turn up please inform us here. if tesla didn't indeed say taht then what about all the hype about his pent house apartment having the 369 numbers and such. is this true or just coincidence?

we do know that a few of tesla'a articles are missing, but what could be the other sources IF tesla did say that? was he quoted by someone else as saying it, for example, walter russel? i've read some of russell's work and it's great reading material. but there are volumes of it and to trace it in a short time is not going to be easy. does anyone have access to WR foundation to contact them for this?

[thx1138]

if the origin does turn up please inform us here.

I surly will.

if tesla didn't indeed say taht then what about all the hype about his pent house apartment having the 369 numbers and such. is this true or just coincidence?

Keep in mind there was a huge effort to discredit his work and since his work was so good they had to go about it by discrediting him has a person. Adding things like the 369 quote, his aversion to women with jewelry, being the friend of pigeons, requiring 18 napkins at each meal, circling a block three times before entering, etc. could all have just been a disinformation campaign to paint his as a madman. It apparently has succeeded since he is today considered the quintessential "mad scientist". So one of the things to watch for is that someone else back then, like Edison, said that Tesla said it. Like I said earlier, without the context it is gibberish and that would fit right in with a disinfo campaign to paint him as unreliable.

we do know that a few of tesla'a articles are missing..."

I'm hoping to make a trip to Serbia and see his museum in Belgrade but it's still going to be a couple of years. Maybe they can help.

i've read some of russell's work and it's great reading material. but there are volumes of it and to trace it in a short time is not going to be easy.

That's the same problem with Tesla's work - there is just so much of it. I studied his work almost exclusively for 2 1/2 years and barely scratched the surface.

[/QUOTE]does anyone have access to WR foundation to contact them for this?[/QUOTE]
Not I.

Thanks for your interest.

[thx1138]

Wrong?

Yes, wrong. If Tesla said it, it has meaning. But without the context it is gibberish. You can attribute it to whoever you like but you still need a citation. Without that and the context you are chasing the jaberwocky.

`Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.

makes just as much sense as "If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6, and 9, then you would have a key to the universe." Maybe more, since we actually know who wrote that and the context.

I've come to believe that it is just a piece of disinformation used to discredit Tesla, the man, since his enemies couldn't discredit his work. See earlier post.

On the other hand, if he did say it, then it may relate to:
3
"An evanescent wave is a near-field wave with an intensity that exhibits exponential decay without absorption as a function of the distance from the boundary at which the wave was formed. Evanescent waves are a general property of wave-equations, and can in principle occur in any context to which a wave-equation applies. They are formed at the boundary between two media with different wave motion properties, and are most intense within one third of a wavelength from the surface of formation[3]. In particular, evanescent waves can occur in the contexts of optics and other forms of electromagnetic radiation, acoustics*, quantum mechanics, and "waves on strings"."

*Tesla said that the electricity he was dealing with was similar to sound waves which we now call longitudinal waves.

6
"The rate at which the field strength drops off from the source depends on the distance between the source and antenna. In addition, this distance also determines whether the field created is magnetic or electric. When the distance is electrically "close" to the loop source, the magnetic field falls off as the square of the distance. When the distance is electrically "far", we observe an electromagnetic plane wave. This plane wave falls off inversely with increasing distance. The point where the electric and magnetic field vectors cross occurs at approximately one-sixth of a wavelength(wave length / 2Pi)

And finally 9 = 3 + 6. Both topics occurring in the near field and collected there (I don't know how) builds the strength of longitudinal waves while minimizing radiated energy which is exactly what Tesla said to do to transmit without conductors and with very low losses. Also related is this quote from what has become known as the Wardencliffe patent (US 1,119,732 - Apparatus For Transmitting Electrical Energy): "The coil B is wound on a frame or drum D' of insulating material, with its turns close together. I have discovered that when so wound the effect of the small radius of curvature of the wire itself is overcome and the coil behaves as a conductor of large radius of curvature, corresponding to that of the drum." It's near the top in the right column on page 2. "...the boundary between two media..." from above on evanescent waves. It's also interesting to note that both phenomena are related to wireless energy transfer.

So that's why I'm interested in finding the context. Otherwise, all of that is just more gibberish and I'm chasing the white rabbit down the yellow brick road while singing the straw man's song - "If I only had a brain..." - Dorothy meets Alice and they have a tea party with the Queen of Hearts and Knave of Fools. Oh my!

[Beamgate]

Yes, wrong. If Tesla said it, it has meaning. But without the context it is gibberish. You can attribute it to whoever you like but you still need a citation. Without that and the context you are chasing the jaberwocky.

I have made no such 'attributions' for the statement to anyone.

If Tesla did (which at the moment seems we cannot verify or accurately cite), he had made the statement based upon various personally-observed EFFECTS (a great start for us as you've indicated) and, since it's not been cited accurately, we do not know WHEN he made the statement.

I only offer the possibility that Tesla MAY have formulated/finalized his '369 postulate' after his brief association with Russell in his(Tesla's) later years.

I would offer that there is, as yet, no right or wrong in this line of research. Without a 'discernible' context for his statements (as we have both pointed out), we are merely left with an interesting numerology to investigate.

In the absence of such a context, I have chosen to seek possible answers with others Tesla may have associated with (or been further enlightened by).

Will be happy to share more as my understanding unfolds.