Blueprints for some >2KW selfruning generator ???

[morpher44]

trolling for 2k generator...

So "trolling" is easy. Dare people to provide you PROOF, and
sit back and criticize them as they try to help you.

I say lets NOT.
If it is such a waste of time to read Bedini, etc., then read something you find to be not a waste of time. Its your life ... your eye balls.... your brain.

The people I respect here are doers, experimenting, contributing,
making things, trying things, speculators, people teaching with
experience, etc.
That is what this forum is all about...
NOT an attitude of "PROVE TO ME" this is worth my time.

Quoting scripture ... "Pearls to swine"...

[ksor]

ksor,

If you didn't have such a terrible attitude I would take the time to teach you how to use the search function of this forum. There is already a thread on this very forum where one of our members has built his version of a Watson machine. He has had it running for as long as a week while it kept the primary battery charged. All he needs to do now is solve some minor mechanical issues. But you see we on this forum don't really owe you anything like you seem to think we do. So maybe if you can figure out how to work the search function instead of putting down what people have offered you in good faith you can just look for yourself.

Respectfully,
Carroll

I'm sorry if I offended you in any way ... that was NOT my intention !

I'll do the search to find what you say IS here somewhere ... so, on with searching - because I think this issue IS VERY interesting but dead-end links and missing videos is of no use at all ... you must admit that - right ?

I have lots of projects going on and I just want some of THESE projects too - maybe it could be charging the batteries of my Toyota Prius ... that would be very, very nice

[ksor]

Those over at Big Oil whose job it is to prevent anyone from making an FE device will take that as a complement. Heck, they're probably demanding bonuses!!

BTW, you don't work for Chevron, Shell or Exxon-Mobil, do you?

------------------
All kidding aside, .... ( Sorry, I couldn't help myself--you seemed so taken) ... apart from solar, wind, or geo-thermal you won't find any cost-effective energy solution to significantly reduce an average N.A. home's energy costs. There are innumerable claims--just claims.

In fact, did you notice the thread with over a million views and more that 8 thousand replies? On page 293 of that thread, a senior forum member wrote:

Don Smith's tesla coil wireless power transmission setup
I have done a fair bit of experimenting with Don Smith's setup of having a tesla coil transmitter surrounded by other resonantly tuned receiving coils and I am not seeing more power out than is being supplied to the transmitting tesla coil.

If I have more than one receiving resonantly tuned coil, the power coming from the transmitter tesla coil is divided between the receiving coils, and if I have only one resonantly tuned receiving coil, the output power is less than the power I am supplying to the transmitter tesla coil. Based on my own experiments (I have done very careful input and output measurements), Don's theory that each receiver coil can pull off a duplicate of the transmitter's power without draining power from the transmitter, and that if you have multiple receivers you can get more total power out than is being supplied to the transmitter, does not appear to be correct.

If anyone has done or is doing experiments with this setup and you believe you are seeing more power out than being supplied to the transmitter, I would be interested to hear exact details about your setup and exactly how you are doing your measurements. My own experimental results just do not seem to support Don's theory for this type of setup.

This was the response from another senior member:
Lots of things Don Smith said were just not correct. Considering what he was supposed to know it seems like a straight out lie to me about the multiple receiver thing. As yet I don't see that anyone has proven him to be correct on that simple point. Which calls into question everything he said that is not so far proven to be true. That's the way I see it.


Not a very promising result for such a lengthy thread, is it?

Ha, ha ... NO I'm NOT in oil business at all - I'm just an retired economist with a lot of hobbies into mechanics, electronics and "manual stuff" you can do with your hands - look at my web site - ... for 30 years I worked with IT-development - so I think I have the skills to do what is needed to make such a "motor-generator" going ... IF only I could find some proper drawings.

[Berg]

So "trolling" is easy. Dare people to provide you PROOF, and
sit back and criticize them as they try to help you.

I say lets NOT.
If it is such a waste of time to read Bedini, etc., then read something you find to be not a waste of time. Its your life ... your eye balls.... your brain.

The people I respect here are doers, experimenting, contributing,
making things, trying things, speculators, people teaching with
experience, etc.
That is what this forum is all about...
NOT an attitude of "PROVE TO ME" this is worth my time.

Quoting scripture ... "Pearls to swine"...

Well, said. I agree with you.

We're gathered here at this forum for the purpose of discussing the overunity concepts and devices.

We're not here to prove anything to anybody.

[vidbid]

What is this, "the prove it to me thread" ?

What does that guy want? Someone to prove overunity to him?

That guy needs to go somewhere else.

We're not here to prove stuff to him.

He has the wrong attitude.

[Ein~+ein]

...I think I have the skills to do what is needed to make such a "motor-generator" going ... IF only I could find some proper drawings.

Try Patrick Kelly's comprehensive Practical Guide to Free-Energy Devices Patrick updates his site weekly and promptly responds to email queries--wish my friends and family did that.

But my personal advice: Scrap the idea!!!

Although I've got limited tech understanding, to my advantage, I'm agnostic. My interest in this topic was perked when, to my complete amazement, nobody, not even engineers in their enthusiasm to discredit him could pinpoint where Thane Heins was deceiving his ReGen-X (regenerative acceleration motor-generator) demo viewers and himself. Yes!!! Not even Mark Dansie considers him a scammer, just self-deluded. On that note, you may also want to look at the recent posts to the Heins' !! Bi-toroid Transformer 1000% OU !!

[ksor]

Try Patrick Kelly's comprehensive Practical Guide to Free-Energy Devices Patrick updates his site weekly and promptly responds to email queries--wish my friends and family did that.

But my personal advice: Scrap the idea!!!

Although I've got limited tech understanding, to my advantage, I'm agnostic. My interest in this topic was perked when, to my complete amazement, nobody, not even engineers in their enthusiasm to discredit him could pinpoint where Thane Heins was deceiving his ReGen-X (regenerative acceleration motor-generator) demo viewers and himself. Yes!!! Not even Mark Dansie considers him a scammer, just self-deluded. On that note, you may also want to look at the recent posts to the Heins' !! Bi-toroid Transformer 1000% OU !!

Mr. Einstein - why do you advice me to scrap the idea ?

[ewizard]

Ha, ha, - what a pile of crap ... how should I be able to make anything at all from such a waste of time viewing that video ????????

I've now red the PDF-file "John Bedine Technology" ... and here too, what a bunch of dead-end links, non existing videos and other crab ... total waste of time reading this 130 pages !

I wonder what kind of people use time writing such a pile og crab ... what do they gain from it ?

What is the purpose of all this writing and babling non sence, never coming to anything usefull !

I simply don't get it ... now I need my medicine !

That video was from Dr. Sloof Lirpa which most people know is April Fools backwards. I was of course razzing you by posting that because of the way you are approaching all of us here. Get Patrick Kelly's Free Energy book, read the book, then come back and talk to us. The link was already posted here by another member.

[Ein~+ein]

Mr. Einstein - why do you advice me to scrap the idea ?

To date, no one has marketed any free-energy motor-generator. Those who try are like medieval alchemists hoping to figure out the formula to turn lead into gold. Since you're interested in motor-generators, why not check out Thane Heins work. He just posted another 3rd party replication video so he may be willing to assist you if you do the same.

You may also want to read the comments in reply to The Day I Created a Perpetual Motion Machine at Ottawa University.

[ksor]

That video was from Dr. Sloof Lirpa which most people know is April Fools backwards. I was of course razzing you by posting that because of the way you are approaching all of us here. Get Patrick Kelly's Free Energy book, read the book, then come back and talk to us. The link was already posted here by another member.

Thx - Now I got this book and will try reading it - hope there is no dead-end links and non-existing videos !

Any ideas of WHY there are so many dead-end links and non-existing or private videos out there ?

[Farmhand]

There could be many reasons for the broken links and removed video's.

People link to things that get removed, people stop experimenting and shut
down accounts. Also free image hosting sites often allow people to upload a lot
of pictures then try to "persuade" them to pay, when they don't pay the site
sometimes removes thumbnail services ect. Some people realize they were
confused and remove the video's. Some people get frustrated with people
twisting their words and "putting words into the mouths of others" and give up
then remover their video's. Some realize they've been conned and decide to
remove the video's they uploaded to support the con. Others get paranoid
when people mess with their heads and remove the video's or pictures
because of that.

I could probably think of a few more reasons but the simple fact is if people
can post video's and links there will be a certain amount get broken links or
just removed.

Some video's are only uploaded to show something to one person one time
and are never meant to be left there for good, just because I want to show a
person a picture of circuit doesn't mean I must leave it on the internet for ever.

Beware of pumped up claims, old saying goes, "it's pays to believe nothing of
what you hear and only half of what you see". I think it's an appropriate saying in these places.

Many people invest heavily in promoting stuff they don't understand and have
never done themselves, and treat it as fact.

How many people promoting Thanes stuff have actually built and
demonstrated the effects ? With solid measurements based on solid
measurement protocol. I say none. And yet people with no experiment
promote his findings. It's bizarre.

Cheers

[ksor]

You writes:

"... but the simple fact is if people
can post video's and links there will be a certain amount get broken links or
just removed."

Yeah, but in this area the is way too much more of dead end links and non-viewable videos and that NOT very trustwerthy !

Huge piles of text where whole chapters are complete non sense - how can the "scientific part of the persons" live with that ?

Where are the moderator of these forums - he should delete such useless material !

[dagwood111]

You writes:

"... but the simple fact is if people
can post video's and links there will be a certain amount get broken links or
just removed."

Yeah, but in this area the is way too much more of dead end links and non-viewable videos and that NOT very trustwerthy !

Huge piles of text where whole chapters are complete non sense - how can the "scientific part of the persons" live with that ?

Where are the moderator of these forums - he should delete such useless material !

He ( the Moderator or admin ) should aslo ban , pigs like you

[ksor]

He ( the Moderator or admin ) should aslo ban , pigs like you

Oh, then you are NOT part of the "scientific part of persons" dealing with this issue.

[wrtner]

Huge piles of text where whole chapters are complete non sense

Which chapter?
.