Tweet
Free Energy is What?
What FREE ENERGY is... it is a technology term - NOT an economic one.
Free Energy is a reference to free environmental potential from the aether, neutrinos or whatever your favorite flavor is.
If a kid puts in 10 parts work to get a kite in the air and that is what he input/leveraged, the wind, heat rising from solar warming of the ground, etc... are all free environmental input sources and that is "free energy". If these environmental sources put in 490 parts energy, that is a total of 500 parts input.
Let's say there are losses against wind resistance on the kite, losses against the resistance of gravity, etc... and the losses are so bad that an entire half of all input energy is lost... 500 input and 50% lost, that means only 250 parts went to flying the kite. 250 in work divided by 500 total input = 0.50 or 50% efficient.
But if we see that 250 parts were were done but the kid only put in 10 parts, that is 250 parts divided by 10 of the kids input = COP (coefficient of performance of 25!) = that is a 2500% GAIN in energy, real work done compared to what the kid had to input.
All that environmental input is what the FREE stands for in the term FREE ENERGY. This is the meaning of term.
There are semantics that come up regarding this that it isn't free because the kid had to pay for for the kite, etc... so it wasn't free. Well, yes, the wind was free and he didn't pay for that - so semantics are one thing and free energy is what it is and that will never change. Yes, the kid did invest something and got a 2500% return on his investment. But the fact remains, the wind blows for FREE, the sun shines for FREE, the Aether is there for FREE, etc... that is free energy. Don't confuse semantics with the core meaning of the term.
I agree the term can be misleading, but it is up to everyone to do their own due diligence to now what it means in relation to the science itself instead of buying into the entitlement society's definition where everything you do should belong to them. That mentality is the problem - that isn't a solution.
It's very easy to see the truth to Benjamin Franklin's quote and see how it applies to this issue: "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
Now somewhere in the last several years, there has been a serious infiltration into the whole free energy community by those that appear to be communists for a lack of a better term because they are hell-bent on attacking anyone that believes they are entitled to the fruits of their own labors. They believe they are automatically entitled to other people's work FOR FREE. The keep up the lie and constantly repeat over and over that "free energy" is supposed to be free for everyone and that anyone earning money from it is an evil capitalist pig - reminiscent of the American-hating communists.
They're mask themselves under the guise of being some altruistic holier-than-thou saints who give everything away for free because the world is doomed to hell unless this all gets out, etc... Yawn... with good quality solar panels getting close to $1 per watt in bulk buys, solar is now cheaper than natural gas in some parts of the country and most our our energy needs can be met with completely conventional and relatively boring technologies right off the shelf.
Anyway, much of this kind of "free energy" technology has been open sourced for years, but unfortunately these entitlement hounds wouldn't know what open source means if it jumped out and bit them on the nose.
Peter Lindemann, John Bedini and others have been open sourcing this science before 99% of the people interested in this field ever heard of the term Free Energy.
Borderlands open sourced a LOT of documentation and they SOLD books, videos, etc... and anyone was free to take the info and go build things and do things with it because that was the point. Borderlands earned income from those books and it was STILL open source. Being involved with some Free Energy topics doesn't mean that they should have been giving away those books and videos for free... that kind of belief is only a sign of a very sheltered and underdeveloped intelligence.
Open source means you give the info out for free and you kiss it goodbye. Anyone can do what they want with it - use it, build it and sell it, etc... the entitlement communists think it is wrong to sell anything relating to this technology, which is completely idiotic because it means they think only someone that can build it themselves should benefit and the grandma down the street that doesn't even know how to spell soldering iron should suffer!
EVERYONE should be able to benefit from this technology meaning, SOMEBODY HAS TO BUILD IT AND SELL IT to those that are unwilling or incapable to do it themselves. Voila - a new industry is created and the economy is better for it, jobs can be created, etc... yet these people that curse those making a living from it think it should be free no matter what. Basically, their frame of reference for the world doesn't reach past the tip of their nose.
Now if you have a generator that can put out 5000 watts nonstop and run itself, besides minor maintenance, you basically have a free energy power plant. You still had to buy the parts, but the "free" part of free energy is referring to the free potential from the environment that is being tapped and made available to do work via the generator.
CONCEPTUALLY, if the ideal Holy Grail of free energy technologies are available, those could be used to grow all our food, make all our products, etc... and humans can just go about their business pursuing their spiritual passions or whatever floats their boat. I'm all for this theoretical utopian society and is what I yearn for, but I'm also not delusional. Our global society is nowhere nearly evolved enough to take anything like this on. The USA is geared to be the largest gas and oil producers on the planets in the next few years. The game is on at all the highest levels to entrap the globe in this oil slavery for as long as they can and they've done a really good job at it so far.
So, when there is some global collapse of the money system and we are all in a position to sink or swim, the powers that be will wind up cannibalizing each other in their caves, and the time has come to rebuild a new society - that is when free energy technologies will be put into place to provide energy to all - for free - so we can spend our time rebuilding our communities. Until that happens, the entitlement communists can put that in their pipe and smoke it and go get a job and leave the rest of us alone that actually believe in abundance and prosperity and that there is enough to go around so everyone's lives can be enriched and operate at a higher standard of living. Until then, "free energy" will continue to NOT have anything to do with being free for all.
I already know there are opinions that are "well, to me free energy means this or that" but I'm not interested in personally created definitions of a term that has been around for years that described one thing - free environmental radiant potential.
Some will agree with me and some will disagree, but one thing is a fact - this is NOT my definition of it - it is the definition that has lasted the test of time well before the Johnny-come-lately entitlement crew started to spread their propaganda. I hope this gives a clear perspective for at least one other person out there.
Free Energy is a reference to free environmental potential from the aether, neutrinos or whatever your favorite flavor is.
If a kid puts in 10 parts work to get a kite in the air and that is what he input/leveraged, the wind, heat rising from solar warming of the ground, etc... are all free environmental input sources and that is "free energy". If these environmental sources put in 490 parts energy, that is a total of 500 parts input.
Let's say there are losses against wind resistance on the kite, losses against the resistance of gravity, etc... and the losses are so bad that an entire half of all input energy is lost... 500 input and 50% lost, that means only 250 parts went to flying the kite. 250 in work divided by 500 total input = 0.50 or 50% efficient.
But if we see that 250 parts were were done but the kid only put in 10 parts, that is 250 parts divided by 10 of the kids input = COP (coefficient of performance of 25!) = that is a 2500% GAIN in energy, real work done compared to what the kid had to input.
All that environmental input is what the FREE stands for in the term FREE ENERGY. This is the meaning of term.
There are semantics that come up regarding this that it isn't free because the kid had to pay for for the kite, etc... so it wasn't free. Well, yes, the wind was free and he didn't pay for that - so semantics are one thing and free energy is what it is and that will never change. Yes, the kid did invest something and got a 2500% return on his investment. But the fact remains, the wind blows for FREE, the sun shines for FREE, the Aether is there for FREE, etc... that is free energy. Don't confuse semantics with the core meaning of the term.
I agree the term can be misleading, but it is up to everyone to do their own due diligence to now what it means in relation to the science itself instead of buying into the entitlement society's definition where everything you do should belong to them. That mentality is the problem - that isn't a solution.
It's very easy to see the truth to Benjamin Franklin's quote and see how it applies to this issue: "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
Now somewhere in the last several years, there has been a serious infiltration into the whole free energy community by those that appear to be communists for a lack of a better term because they are hell-bent on attacking anyone that believes they are entitled to the fruits of their own labors. They believe they are automatically entitled to other people's work FOR FREE. The keep up the lie and constantly repeat over and over that "free energy" is supposed to be free for everyone and that anyone earning money from it is an evil capitalist pig - reminiscent of the American-hating communists.
They're mask themselves under the guise of being some altruistic holier-than-thou saints who give everything away for free because the world is doomed to hell unless this all gets out, etc... Yawn... with good quality solar panels getting close to $1 per watt in bulk buys, solar is now cheaper than natural gas in some parts of the country and most our our energy needs can be met with completely conventional and relatively boring technologies right off the shelf.
Anyway, much of this kind of "free energy" technology has been open sourced for years, but unfortunately these entitlement hounds wouldn't know what open source means if it jumped out and bit them on the nose.
Peter Lindemann, John Bedini and others have been open sourcing this science before 99% of the people interested in this field ever heard of the term Free Energy.
Borderlands open sourced a LOT of documentation and they SOLD books, videos, etc... and anyone was free to take the info and go build things and do things with it because that was the point. Borderlands earned income from those books and it was STILL open source. Being involved with some Free Energy topics doesn't mean that they should have been giving away those books and videos for free... that kind of belief is only a sign of a very sheltered and underdeveloped intelligence.
Open source means you give the info out for free and you kiss it goodbye. Anyone can do what they want with it - use it, build it and sell it, etc... the entitlement communists think it is wrong to sell anything relating to this technology, which is completely idiotic because it means they think only someone that can build it themselves should benefit and the grandma down the street that doesn't even know how to spell soldering iron should suffer!
EVERYONE should be able to benefit from this technology meaning, SOMEBODY HAS TO BUILD IT AND SELL IT to those that are unwilling or incapable to do it themselves. Voila - a new industry is created and the economy is better for it, jobs can be created, etc... yet these people that curse those making a living from it think it should be free no matter what. Basically, their frame of reference for the world doesn't reach past the tip of their nose.
Now if you have a generator that can put out 5000 watts nonstop and run itself, besides minor maintenance, you basically have a free energy power plant. You still had to buy the parts, but the "free" part of free energy is referring to the free potential from the environment that is being tapped and made available to do work via the generator.
CONCEPTUALLY, if the ideal Holy Grail of free energy technologies are available, those could be used to grow all our food, make all our products, etc... and humans can just go about their business pursuing their spiritual passions or whatever floats their boat. I'm all for this theoretical utopian society and is what I yearn for, but I'm also not delusional. Our global society is nowhere nearly evolved enough to take anything like this on. The USA is geared to be the largest gas and oil producers on the planets in the next few years. The game is on at all the highest levels to entrap the globe in this oil slavery for as long as they can and they've done a really good job at it so far.
So, when there is some global collapse of the money system and we are all in a position to sink or swim, the powers that be will wind up cannibalizing each other in their caves, and the time has come to rebuild a new society - that is when free energy technologies will be put into place to provide energy to all - for free - so we can spend our time rebuilding our communities. Until that happens, the entitlement communists can put that in their pipe and smoke it and go get a job and leave the rest of us alone that actually believe in abundance and prosperity and that there is enough to go around so everyone's lives can be enriched and operate at a higher standard of living. Until then, "free energy" will continue to NOT have anything to do with being free for all.
I already know there are opinions that are "well, to me free energy means this or that" but I'm not interested in personally created definitions of a term that has been around for years that described one thing - free environmental radiant potential.
Some will agree with me and some will disagree, but one thing is a fact - this is NOT my definition of it - it is the definition that has lasted the test of time well before the Johnny-come-lately entitlement crew started to spread their propaganda. I hope this gives a clear perspective for at least one other person out there.
)
?
Comment