A couple of things that I have been working on:
The results of iterative dividing 360 by the numbers 2 through 16:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d28ad/d28ad3f3a9ad0972c04e1818c2c999b52342dd2e" alt=""
An example that used the number 2:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a2c8/8a2c88d1e0550f1606558d1fc2ed2f8078ded096" alt=""
Current end results of various observations, research, knowledge etc:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2585/c25854c8a0dd676032f6ec662278a6794f6cd867" alt=""
The Left side is for any type of energy input. Whether emotional, a dietary element such as sodium or exercise.
The Top shows units of Time.
The sine-wave allows for positioning of energy input over time.
The sections of the sine-wave below show the most effective areas to extert control over the rise of input and output/decline.
It is based on the effect of pushing energy into a system to a certain extent (53 degrees). After which (depending on the amount of energy input and duration of time of input) the act of pushing can abruptly end and 'flip' to a pulling effect by the opposite potential. In turn can dramatically increase the rise time as well as the overall peak that is gained. In addition to pulling additional energy from the source that was originally pushing energy into the system.
Both factors are unique in that they are governed by ones understanding of what is actually occuring. The degree of understanding allows for modification of energy input to avoid the rapid and extreme high and/or increase the duration of time for the decline to reach the trough of the sine wave. The shear of of a sharp incline or decline in the least temporarily removes the fundamental source anything requires to exist. This is what decay and in worst cases destruction actually are. All a matter of degree.
For myself it is a valuable tool that enables me to decrease the rate of decay in any area/aspect that it is applied to.
There is a opposite effect present that is revealed in efforts to validate this. I hvae not yet invested thought in it. But I became aware of it when considering the unique affect that runners often experience called a 'runners high' or 'second wind'.
In consideration of the divisions of 360. Kepler made a vague reference regarding (paraphrased) need of a source of comparison to assist in his studies of planetary orbits. No better source than perfection itself. A 360 degree circle. This is useful in many other areas.
After performing the divisions, I realized that I had probably just repeated the Pythagorean string division. Yet to be validated as the angles that arose from this investigation are profoundly interesting. Specifically the number 24. Not to demote the others... but this one appears to be the big kahuna.
Imagine a drop of water falling onto the still surface of a pool of water. The rings generated are near perfect. Imagine now the Sun as that drop of water.
In both instances I call these harmonic rings. In which matter can form in harmony and increase in density.
Knowing that there is always rotations taking place on all planes.. one could safely assume that at a certain level of density this matter would begin to move around it's parent harmonic ring... which effectively would cause a deformation of the otherwise perfect circle.
24 represents perfection. Density represents the degree from perfection. Therefore the numbers we have obtained regarding anything that is physical will not be perfection, but instead an offset from perfection. Examples would be axial tilt, demarcations of the tropic of cancer/capricorn, the full solar sunspot cycle. 23.5 abounds everywhere... but I am curious about what it says regarding what the axis of the earth is point to????
The numbers themselves show a physical/non-physical representation. In the first image there are sums to the right. The top 7 angles and below the remainder (which may be 7).
The top is 270 degrees equating to 3 quarters of a circle.
The bottom 341 is odd... it is 19 off from being a full 360. The number 19 is a sore thumb... if it has been mentioned in texts it is rare.
But in looking at the numbers that provided the sum of 341... there is one number that sticks out as well. 53.
Omitting 53 from the sum we get, 288. Which is exactly 18 degrees from 270.
Stepping backwards by omitting the 53 provides perfection... retaining it shows movement away from perfection.
18 is unique in that it is the sum of the numbers 3,6,9.
In the first image to the right of the number used for the division, specifically 3,6 and 9... just to the right of where you see A). Is the number that defined the line for the angle found. The sequence after the decimal. 3 and 6 seem to make sense as they are derived from dividing by 3 and 6. But what of 9? I have no clue. But I think 9's sequence of 4's is the hint??
An obvious physical/non-physical is simply the lack of a whole number after successive divisions. the more preceeding zeros the further away physicality is.
Some very interesting stuff. Then again one probably has to see the value in metaphor to see it as interesting. Regardless I hope that it causes questions if not here, maybe in your mind.
The results of iterative dividing 360 by the numbers 2 through 16:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d28ad/d28ad3f3a9ad0972c04e1818c2c999b52342dd2e" alt=""
An example that used the number 2:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a2c8/8a2c88d1e0550f1606558d1fc2ed2f8078ded096" alt=""
Current end results of various observations, research, knowledge etc:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2585/c25854c8a0dd676032f6ec662278a6794f6cd867" alt=""
The Left side is for any type of energy input. Whether emotional, a dietary element such as sodium or exercise.
The Top shows units of Time.
The sine-wave allows for positioning of energy input over time.
The sections of the sine-wave below show the most effective areas to extert control over the rise of input and output/decline.
It is based on the effect of pushing energy into a system to a certain extent (53 degrees). After which (depending on the amount of energy input and duration of time of input) the act of pushing can abruptly end and 'flip' to a pulling effect by the opposite potential. In turn can dramatically increase the rise time as well as the overall peak that is gained. In addition to pulling additional energy from the source that was originally pushing energy into the system.
Both factors are unique in that they are governed by ones understanding of what is actually occuring. The degree of understanding allows for modification of energy input to avoid the rapid and extreme high and/or increase the duration of time for the decline to reach the trough of the sine wave. The shear of of a sharp incline or decline in the least temporarily removes the fundamental source anything requires to exist. This is what decay and in worst cases destruction actually are. All a matter of degree.
For myself it is a valuable tool that enables me to decrease the rate of decay in any area/aspect that it is applied to.
There is a opposite effect present that is revealed in efforts to validate this. I hvae not yet invested thought in it. But I became aware of it when considering the unique affect that runners often experience called a 'runners high' or 'second wind'.
In consideration of the divisions of 360. Kepler made a vague reference regarding (paraphrased) need of a source of comparison to assist in his studies of planetary orbits. No better source than perfection itself. A 360 degree circle. This is useful in many other areas.
After performing the divisions, I realized that I had probably just repeated the Pythagorean string division. Yet to be validated as the angles that arose from this investigation are profoundly interesting. Specifically the number 24. Not to demote the others... but this one appears to be the big kahuna.
Imagine a drop of water falling onto the still surface of a pool of water. The rings generated are near perfect. Imagine now the Sun as that drop of water.
In both instances I call these harmonic rings. In which matter can form in harmony and increase in density.
Knowing that there is always rotations taking place on all planes.. one could safely assume that at a certain level of density this matter would begin to move around it's parent harmonic ring... which effectively would cause a deformation of the otherwise perfect circle.
24 represents perfection. Density represents the degree from perfection. Therefore the numbers we have obtained regarding anything that is physical will not be perfection, but instead an offset from perfection. Examples would be axial tilt, demarcations of the tropic of cancer/capricorn, the full solar sunspot cycle. 23.5 abounds everywhere... but I am curious about what it says regarding what the axis of the earth is point to????
The numbers themselves show a physical/non-physical representation. In the first image there are sums to the right. The top 7 angles and below the remainder (which may be 7).
The top is 270 degrees equating to 3 quarters of a circle.
The bottom 341 is odd... it is 19 off from being a full 360. The number 19 is a sore thumb... if it has been mentioned in texts it is rare.
But in looking at the numbers that provided the sum of 341... there is one number that sticks out as well. 53.
Omitting 53 from the sum we get, 288. Which is exactly 18 degrees from 270.
Stepping backwards by omitting the 53 provides perfection... retaining it shows movement away from perfection.
18 is unique in that it is the sum of the numbers 3,6,9.
In the first image to the right of the number used for the division, specifically 3,6 and 9... just to the right of where you see A). Is the number that defined the line for the angle found. The sequence after the decimal. 3 and 6 seem to make sense as they are derived from dividing by 3 and 6. But what of 9? I have no clue. But I think 9's sequence of 4's is the hint??
An obvious physical/non-physical is simply the lack of a whole number after successive divisions. the more preceeding zeros the further away physicality is.
Some very interesting stuff. Then again one probably has to see the value in metaphor to see it as interesting. Regardless I hope that it causes questions if not here, maybe in your mind.
Comment