data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/089f0/089f0a38e99dce01827597ce626d56a4f6a6f0bd" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81a32/81a3270b16db0ce1d409b0aa8e2248f32dd45db2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e41d5/e41d5d671935d6b0acff82d1c1000b3c610889e9" alt="Thumbs Up Smiley"
Which of these three universal models do you prefer?
Watch the video if you need help deciding.
The fella in the video is Brian Schmidt, a noble Nobel winner in 2011.
Open - Infinite - Light
Flat - Just Right
Closed - Finite - Heavy
Here is another analogy re: OPEN vs. CLOSED.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f6e3/8f6e35c8b1741afd65b108174dd8514cfd360992" alt=""
source of image:
http://www.energeticforum.com/171565-post160.html
Before voting you might want to read post #14 first.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46c38/46c383b0016c731603048b007f4393c1c720c3b4" alt="Thinking Smiley"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55069/55069ed8576b1ef4a999e0f073132c4246701e88" alt="Finger Dance"
Why do we need to decide what the fIELd looks like?
"If you want to control the field you must replicate the field geometry....structure and function cannot be seperated.
Thats what Tesla was doing when he experimented with different geometries."
-Junglelord
Thats what Tesla was doing when he experimented with different geometries."
-Junglelord
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d1ba/2d1ba45ee48e00c7d0996369db1e72b98b41916e" alt="Beam Me Up"
RIP Junglelord
selah V
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/100e8/100e834e723db277cd61a5c5e79647f4a5267975" alt="Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)"
Raphael
Comment