Your banner headline is certainly impressive but as I said and as Dr Royal Raymond Rife says himself, under the documented and recorded inspection of two medical universities (tasked at his own insistence to do exactly that .. He well knew, the opposition! ) And also witnessed by the top medical practitioners of the land he proceeded to return each and every patient to good health … I'm sure I don't have to point out that's one hundred percent! And its also exactly that “a cure all device” writing it bigger and bigger doesn't deny and alter the facts of history!
The majority of these were cancer sufferers although of course there were other horrors amongst the dyeing that he approached resolved and cured them too.
I am also aware cure isn't really a term you can apply to cancer until many years have passed .
However I think in the terms of this thread … If it gone … and there is no trace to be detected of it in a matter of weeks . Then we can regard it as a very effective cure. And I might add a better effective and selective cure than anything available at the moment.
However if you moderated your banner headline to “No cancer cure all device" available to the public “ … at the moment , for obvious reasons
that would be far more acceptable, don't you think?
The majority of these were cancer sufferers although of course there were other horrors amongst the dyeing that he approached resolved and cured them too.
I am also aware cure isn't really a term you can apply to cancer until many years have passed .
However I think in the terms of this thread … If it gone … and there is no trace to be detected of it in a matter of weeks . Then we can regard it as a very effective cure. And I might add a better effective and selective cure than anything available at the moment.
However if you moderated your banner headline to “No cancer cure all device" available to the public “ … at the moment , for obvious reasons
that would be far more acceptable, don't you think?
Comment