My Analysis...on the QEG/WITTS GEN
Hello to All,
I like this Machine, it's got "something" about it that is pretty simple and complex at same time...and I love it.
However, there are some things I can not find relation to...or understand them quite well.
On the QEG pdf they mention the Tesla Patent related to a reciprocating Generator, and they say they just "transfer" same principle to a Rotary Device...When we read the Tesla Patent, in essence He is Synchronizing Two Resonances, one is a completely Mechanical one...A Spring loaded, then released to obtain that "Self Vibration" controlled to be in one vector of force...as also Magnetic Resonance is controlled to go same directional vector, and Tesla mentions the Electromagnetic Resonance should be near the Mechanical one, but mechanical should be always above...understood why perfectly...a great patent.
Now...Neither on the QEG or the WITTS Generators...I canīt seem to find any Mechanical Resonance obtained by rotation...ŋ?
On the other hand Mr. Lindemann relates to this Machine as a "Reluctance Generator"...
Reluctance means Resistance applied to electromotive forces...Magnetic Resistance...Magnetic Reluctance...same thing.
On ALL the Reluctance Motors and Generators I have searched for...so far (maybe I missed "the one")..I have not found just one...where the Coils are in a Toroidal Shape "away" from their magnetic fields (like QEG/WITTS), whether self induced or excited...conflicting directly with laminated pure steel rotors...so, honestly, I can not see any magnetic "reluctance or resistance" here at all....and, for sake of simplicity...we could call it...Magnetic Drag.
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
I do understand perfectly, that by turning coils like all those Reluctance Machines above...the Steel Rotor would be "suffering" a huge and constant magnetic drag (steel is "dancing" within a 100% magnetic field(s) environment)...just because a simple knowledge about magnetic field projection perpendicular to coil "flat plane" created/defined by its circular/square/rectangular windings...
But, but...in a Toroidal Winding Shape...everything changes!!...as we all know the magnetic field is projected within the Toroid Geometric Volume...so, never projecting directly against steel rotor...no matter if rotor contains windings as well...
Nikola Tesla has so many Patents...where he builds this type of Toroidal Generating Windings, where the Exciting Fields (Stators) Rotors, are never encountering a "Face to Face" magnetic field projection...therefore they are all...almost "magnetic drag or resistance free".
I have mentioned this big time difference all along my posts here...
In conclusion...Mr. Lindemann, I could not see any direct/frontal Magnetic Reluctance/Resistance on the QEG or WITTS Designs...so, could you please, clear my ignorance, enlightening me on this fields... as why you categorize this type of design as the reluctance type?
Thanks in advance Mr. Lindemann!
Kind Regards to All
Ufopolitics
Hello to All,
I like this Machine, it's got "something" about it that is pretty simple and complex at same time...and I love it.
However, there are some things I can not find relation to...or understand them quite well.
On the QEG pdf they mention the Tesla Patent related to a reciprocating Generator, and they say they just "transfer" same principle to a Rotary Device...When we read the Tesla Patent, in essence He is Synchronizing Two Resonances, one is a completely Mechanical one...A Spring loaded, then released to obtain that "Self Vibration" controlled to be in one vector of force...as also Magnetic Resonance is controlled to go same directional vector, and Tesla mentions the Electromagnetic Resonance should be near the Mechanical one, but mechanical should be always above...understood why perfectly...a great patent.
Now...Neither on the QEG or the WITTS Generators...I canīt seem to find any Mechanical Resonance obtained by rotation...ŋ?
On the other hand Mr. Lindemann relates to this Machine as a "Reluctance Generator"...
Reluctance means Resistance applied to electromotive forces...Magnetic Resistance...Magnetic Reluctance...same thing.
On ALL the Reluctance Motors and Generators I have searched for...so far (maybe I missed "the one")..I have not found just one...where the Coils are in a Toroidal Shape "away" from their magnetic fields (like QEG/WITTS), whether self induced or excited...conflicting directly with laminated pure steel rotors...so, honestly, I can not see any magnetic "reluctance or resistance" here at all....and, for sake of simplicity...we could call it...Magnetic Drag.
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]
I do understand perfectly, that by turning coils like all those Reluctance Machines above...the Steel Rotor would be "suffering" a huge and constant magnetic drag (steel is "dancing" within a 100% magnetic field(s) environment)...just because a simple knowledge about magnetic field projection perpendicular to coil "flat plane" created/defined by its circular/square/rectangular windings...
But, but...in a Toroidal Winding Shape...everything changes!!...as we all know the magnetic field is projected within the Toroid Geometric Volume...so, never projecting directly against steel rotor...no matter if rotor contains windings as well...
Nikola Tesla has so many Patents...where he builds this type of Toroidal Generating Windings, where the Exciting Fields (Stators) Rotors, are never encountering a "Face to Face" magnetic field projection...therefore they are all...almost "magnetic drag or resistance free".
I have mentioned this big time difference all along my posts here...
In conclusion...Mr. Lindemann, I could not see any direct/frontal Magnetic Reluctance/Resistance on the QEG or WITTS Designs...so, could you please, clear my ignorance, enlightening me on this fields... as why you categorize this type of design as the reluctance type?
Thanks in advance Mr. Lindemann!
Kind Regards to All
Ufopolitics
Comment