Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Analysis of the WITTS Generator

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by dR-Green View Post
    Yes, stay well out of the way of the forthcoming angry mob.
    I had thoughts along these same lines but did not want to say it.
    My hope for their success may be blind, but I wish to send only positive (good luck) to them.

    Comment


    • resonance?

      Originally posted by Siggi1974 View Post
      I would not judge that fast, although I also feel that something is really misleading with the whole "Hopegirl story". Fact is that we do not have yet pure data of what is going on in the QEG. What I find interesting is that V and I seem to be in phase. This is not typical for reactive power. The Input of the motor can also be reduced further using better techniques.

      Best regards
      Siggi
      If the circuit is in resonance, then V and I have to be in phase.
      I fully agree that the test report isn't clear enough to prove the OU claims.
      I sincerely hope these guys publish data that woud convince us all.

      Best of luck
      Ben

      Comment


      • Hope for Money

        Originally posted by Ben2503 View Post
        If the circuit is in resonance, then V and I have to be in phase.
        I fully agree that the test report isn't clear enough to prove the OU claims.
        I sincerely hope these guys publish data that woud convince us all.

        Best of luck
        Ben
        First of all the FTW Team has published price data for consultations via Skype on their Homepage. FTW QEG Consulting

        Best regards
        Siggi
        Asymmetry is the Key for free energy

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Siggi1974 View Post
          First of all the FTW Team has published price data for consultations via Skype on their Homepage. FTW QEG Consulting

          Best regards
          Siggi
          What the F***... All I have to say is 'wow'. They haven't shown anything except a bunch of people cheering because some lights came on. $300 for an hour of consultation?!? $5/minute after that hour?! No wonder they cited WITTS as their source. Go give Timothy Thrapp's new guise some more money!!
          Last edited by Web000x; 05-21-2014, 01:12 AM.

          Comment


          • Beware of Spontaneous Combustion

            You MUST pay for the consulting because this NEW ENERGY SOURCE can start fires at a distance from the QEG! Their claims, not mine.

            It only makes sense that if your DNA is resonating with the machine as Hope Girl claims, that YOU could be the location and fuel source for the fire outbreak.

            Drink plenty of fluids before attempting resonance of this device.

            Flammable fluids such as alcohol should be avoided.

            More warnings are available from me for the appropriate price.

            Comment


            • This is the thread for you.

              Here is where you guys should go post your negative comments.

              http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...rs-thread.html
              Potential, is a terrible thing to waste.

              Comment


              • Jame's Update with Taiwan Team

                2014/5/19

                Hey Guys!

                Sorry I couldn't get on with you last night. I was trying to get a set of data taken and talk to several people... it was 2:30 am before I got it all together... anyway, I'm trying it a different way... I'll leave a message here and you can see it when you get up and around, then I'll check back with you around 6 pm (EST) and we can discuss.

                Here's what I've got so far. Firstly, I want to make sure we're all using peak readings at this point. Can you confirm? So here is the data from 3100 turn coils loop wired as secondary: At 2588 RPM (173Hz output frequency), for 1000W input (at the wall), I'm getting 3000W output. At 600W input, It's 1360W, and at 500W in, I've got 836W out. I'm using roughly the same cap value in series (167nF) as the original config., with the six 100W, 240 volt lamps in the loop as the load. So it's just the original C value, in series with the six lamps. For the 350 turn coils loop, I'm using 14.2uF in series, with no R value in the loop. I don't have any high wattage variable resistors here, but I have an 1800 W (30 ohms) heating element that I want to try in the circuit today.

                I may be able to move the tap on the heating element... Some things I've noticed: With this configuration, I've actually got 3 resonances as I spin up the rotor (to 2588 RPM). The 1st and 2nd do not phase lock (I can dial right through) and are multi-phasic (power going back and forth as Jeremy mentions), and when I get to the 2588 RPM main resonance, the phase lock is amazing! I can vary the input power between about 500W to over 1000W and RPM change is less than 5. If I increase the cap value (to about 200nF), I get a resonance at very low RPM (about 1200) that really locks in, and has even more power (measured 4200W), but there is some sinewave distortion (peaks are not all the same amplitude) and it's really too slow mechanically. The main resonance has a clean sinewave.

                I remembered Evens said there was also power in the 350 turn coils (as primary) with this configuration, so I decided to see how much... and this was a big surprise... at 86Hz (half of output frequency), I measured 9,460W with 600W input, and 13,326W at 800W input! I verified with a current probe, and there is over 6 amps in the circuit! At 800W input, this is about 1590W RMS - enough to power the motor. I measured the output from the 350 turn loop previously with the original configuration, and with 700W input, I had only 1,836W peak (about 175W RMS).

                This leads me to think: what if we went back to the original configuration, and place the C (and possibly R) in the 350 turn loop with the load? Obviously more testing is needed. But, I think there is a lot of merit with this new configuration. We need to better understand the interaction between the primary and secondary, and how to optimally tune the loops. I suspect we need at least one variable resistance, in the 350 turn/14.2uF loop, to be able to fine tune and match the resonances.
                The lamps (as load) in the 3100 turn loop provide the R function. I'll try tuning the 350 coil loop today, with this 30 ohm resistive heating element I have. I like the transverter scheme as a means of getting the power out. I believe this would also provide the frequency conversion (from whatever our final output frequency will be) to 50 or 60 Hz, using the timebase in the SCR controller.

                Interfacing to the real world brings up another item I've been wanting to mention to you guys: Judging from Witts latest (full version) video, the lack of any discernable change in resonance/sound/RPM etc. as he turns on lamp after lamp leads me to believe there is a constant impedance load on the output. In other words, I think the generator is operated at full power, full time, and the load is completely isolated from the output circuit (transformer or inductor as load), and all the power is pulled out of the secondary. This transformer/inductor load may also be a 3rd resonant (tuned) circuit on the generator side. And possibly, this may need to be set up first, before trying to tune in to the 'sweet spot' (original configuration).

                The transverter could work this way since there is a step-down transformer... Here's another scheme we were looking at (attached - you guys may have seen this already). This magnetic converter circuit could also provide the constant impedance and frequency conversion. Take a look and let me know your thoughts. I will be back on around 6pm. Leave me your questions here, and I'll pick them up through the day and we can discuss tonight. Thanks so much for all your work and dedication!

                Vive La Resistance!

                Jamie
                Potential, is a terrible thing to waste.

                Comment


                • Watt a bunch of CRAPP.

                  May the force be with you.

                  Regards Cornboy.
                  Last edited by Cornboy 555; 05-21-2014, 09:03 AM.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Stephen Brown View Post
                    Jame's Update with Taiwan Team

                    2014/5/19

                    Hey Guys!

                    Sorry I couldn't get on with you last night. I was trying to get a set of data taken and talk to several people... it was 2:30 am before I got it all together... anyway, I'm trying it a different way... I'll leave a message here and you can see it when you get up and around, then I'll check back with you around 6 pm (EST) and we can discuss.

                    Here's what I've got so far. Firstly, I want to make sure we're all using peak readings at this point. Can you confirm? So here is the data from 3100 turn coils loop wired as secondary: At 2588 RPM (173Hz output frequency), for 1000W input (at the wall), I'm getting 3000W output. At 600W input, It's 1360W, and at 500W in, I've got 836W out. I'm using roughly the same cap value in series (167nF) as the original config., with the six 100W, 240 volt lamps in the loop as the load. So it's just the original C value, in series with the six lamps. For the 350 turn coils loop, I'm using 14.2uF in series, with no R value in the loop. I don't have any high wattage variable resistors here, but I have an 1800 W (30 ohms) heating element that I want to try in the circuit today.

                    I may be able to move the tap on the heating element... Some things I've noticed: With this configuration, I've actually got 3 resonances as I spin up the rotor (to 2588 RPM). The 1st and 2nd do not phase lock (I can dial right through) and are multi-phasic (power going back and forth as Jeremy mentions), and when I get to the 2588 RPM main resonance, the phase lock is amazing! I can vary the input power between about 500W to over 1000W and RPM change is less than 5. If I increase the cap value (to about 200nF), I get a resonance at very low RPM (about 1200) that really locks in, and has even more power (measured 4200W), but there is some sinewave distortion (peaks are not all the same amplitude) and it's really too slow mechanically. The main resonance has a clean sinewave.

                    I remembered Evens said there was also power in the 350 turn coils (as primary) with this configuration, so I decided to see how much... and this was a big surprise... at 86Hz (half of output frequency), I measured 9,460W with 600W input, and 13,326W at 800W input! I verified with a current probe, and there is over 6 amps in the circuit! At 800W input, this is about 1590W RMS - enough to power the motor. I measured the output from the 350 turn loop previously with the original configuration, and with 700W input, I had only 1,836W peak (about 175W RMS).

                    This leads me to think: what if we went back to the original configuration, and place the C (and possibly R) in the 350 turn loop with the load? Obviously more testing is needed. But, I think there is a lot of merit with this new configuration. We need to better understand the interaction between the primary and secondary, and how to optimally tune the loops. I suspect we need at least one variable resistance, in the 350 turn/14.2uF loop, to be able to fine tune and match the resonances.
                    The lamps (as load) in the 3100 turn loop provide the R function. I'll try tuning the 350 coil loop today, with this 30 ohm resistive heating element I have. I like the transverter scheme as a means of getting the power out. I believe this would also provide the frequency conversion (from whatever our final output frequency will be) to 50 or 60 Hz, using the timebase in the SCR controller.

                    Interfacing to the real world brings up another item I've been wanting to mention to you guys: Judging from Witts latest (full version) video, the lack of any discernable change in resonance/sound/RPM etc. as he turns on lamp after lamp leads me to believe there is a constant impedance load on the output. In other words, I think the generator is operated at full power, full time, and the load is completely isolated from the output circuit (transformer or inductor as load), and all the power is pulled out of the secondary. This transformer/inductor load may also be a 3rd resonant (tuned) circuit on the generator side. And possibly, this may need to be set up first, before trying to tune in to the 'sweet spot' (original configuration).

                    The transverter could work this way since there is a step-down transformer... Here's another scheme we were looking at (attached - you guys may have seen this already). This magnetic converter circuit could also provide the constant impedance and frequency conversion. Take a look and let me know your thoughts. I will be back on around 6pm. Leave me your questions here, and I'll pick them up through the day and we can discuss tonight. Thanks so much for all your work and dedication!

                    Vive La Resistance!

                    Jamie
                    Interesting.

                    Thanks for sharing.

                    Regards,

                    VIDBID
                    Regards,

                    VIDBID

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Stephen Brown View Post
                      Here is where you guys should go post your negative comments.

                      http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...rs-thread.html
                      Sorry but where b.s. appears; b.s. should be called. But thanks for the suggestion.

                      Cheerleaders for the QEG should contact James and ask him if he can multipy by .707 like the rest of the world.

                      Perhaps they could also ask him why he thinks he has a measurable output without a resistive load? Ok he has light bubs that don't look fully lit. If he is producing so much power above and beyond these light bulbs, why measure it when he could just add light bulbs ad infinitum?

                      Why does he think he needs to tap an 1800 watt heating element. I would be much more impressed if he would run his 3000 watts of supposed output through that element and make it glow white hot and burn it up!

                      Then shall I believe. Hell, I might even put on a cheerleader skirt myself.
                      So far, this group has done nothing to put out information that looks real and true. They have said some pretty far out and strange things that don't resonate (pun intended).

                      Comment


                      • To be fair!

                        Originally posted by OrionLightShip View Post
                        Sorry but where b.s. appears; b.s. should be called. But thanks for the suggestion.

                        Cheerleaders for the QEG should contact James and ask him if he can multipy by .707 like the rest of the world.

                        Perhaps they could also ask him why he thinks he has a measurable output without a resistive load? Ok he has light bubs that don't look fully lit. If he is producing so much power above and beyond these light bulbs, why measure it when he could just add light bulbs ad infinitum?

                        Why does he think he needs to tap an 1800 watt heating element. I would be much more impressed if he would run his 3000 watts of supposed output through that element and make it glow white hot and burn it up!

                        Then shall I believe. Hell, I might even put on a cheerleader skirt myself.
                        So far, this group has done nothing to put out information that looks real and true. They have said some pretty far out and strange things that don't resonate (pun intended).
                        I read through the post and it is fair enough to mention that he is giving RMS data that look quiet promising. For me it is also OK to bring impedance, capacitance and resistance in the game to be values that are dependant on each other to achieve resonance and phase lock in harmonics. The problem is now to make these values to do real work for you. I am working on this Problem in my test rig (no QEG) for years and I will be more than happy when James solves this. As soon as there is any small proof that the QEG is able to selfrun I will build it and be a cheerleader

                        Best regards
                        Siggi
                        Asymmetry is the Key for free energy

                        Comment


                        • Uncle

                          Originally posted by Siggi1974 View Post
                          I read through the post and it is fair enough to mention that he is giving RMS data that look quiet promising. For me it is also OK to bring impedance, capacitance and resistance in the game to be values that are dependant on each other to achieve resonance and phase lock in harmonics. The problem is now to make these values to do real work for you. I am working on this Problem in my test rig (no QEG) for years and I will be more than happy when James solves this. As soon as there is any small proof that the QEG is able to selfrun I will build it and be a cheerleader

                          Best regards
                          Siggi
                          whatever dude. I see nothing of value there but I suppose if someone talks enough you can read whatever you want. at any rate, I'm done wasting time here. people believe the strangest things and I'm frankly shocked that this "device" still attracts attention after all the ignorance (lack of knowledge) that they have displayed as well as the b.s. mystical nature of their "technology".

                          you need a basis for operation. their basis is a quantum energy field in the exciter coil. they might as well say it's magic.

                          this all originated with Timothy Thrapp. If you buy anything he is selling then perhaps you need to have your hopes dashed a few times to get back to reality. this will end up being the biggest debacle ever....worse than Mylow.

                          I'm out

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by OrionLightShip View Post
                            ...Why does he think he needs to tap an 1800 watt heating element. I would be much more impressed if he would run his 3000 watts of supposed output through that element and make it glow white hot and burn it up!...
                            Exactly! If I had something I thought was generating 4KW I'd stick a load on it and see, rather than philosophising about it. Reminds me of Naudin's Kapanadze replication (debacle more like) - for months we were treated to seemingly better & better results, only to have him buy a more expensive piece of kit to show it was all an illusion! All Naudin would have had to do was stick a few light-bulbs in series with the mains supply and see if they'd pop - 140W in, 1000+ watts out if memory serves - instead we were treated to a dog & pony show. I also tried replicating it, mostly because of his positive results. Suffice it to say, I saw no overunity. I also decided after that, that Naudin was bought & paid for, just another funded distraction.

                            Comment


                            • Morocco: Test & Measurement Report released

                              From: Quantum Energy Generator Forum :: Topic: Updates from the Fix The World (1/1)

                              QEG Morocco Test and Measurement Report Opensourced:

                              http://hopegirl2012.files.wordpress....eport-v1-0.doc

                              QEG 3rd Phase Development: Self-running:

                              QEG 3rd Phase Development: Self-running | HOPEGIRL BLOG

                              Show Them The Money! Fix the World QEG Statement of Expenditures Report:

                              Show Them The Money! Fix the World QEG Statement of Expenditures Report | HOPEGIRL BLOG

                              Wish'n them success
                              Dan

                              Comment


                              • May 30 Update

                                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jhd0Ebygriw

                                http://be-do.com/media/kunena/attach...ort-v2-011.pdf


                                from the cheerleading
                                section
                                dan

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X