Analysis of the WITTS Generator

[Turion]

QEG,
When I posted my little poem, I guess I should have been more specific. In post 452 you made the statement:

"Over-Unity is a very cruel joke."

It was to that statement and your general opinion of such devices I was referring, not to the WITTS device specifically. As I said in my last post, I have not seen enough information about the WITTS device to have an opinion. However, I am skeptical. But just because this particular device may not produce more energy than it takes to run does not mean ALL such devices are frauds. And if you believe that to be the case, why are you here? Just to argue with everyone? To show us the error of our ways? What a waste of your life THAT would be. LOL

Dave

[Farmhand]

Who are you addressing Dave ? I'll assume it is me you are referring to. I was
replying to BroMikey because my name was mentioned in relation to Witts
which is a known scam. I simply answered the question he posed and gave
my opinion on that. The QEG is a copy of the Witts "device" and is in my
opinion also an obvious scam.

That's called free speech. And this site is not only for people who believe in
all scams. Skepticism is healthy.

I am a member of this site because I thought people wanted to collaborate
on new, novel and efficient ways to harness energy.

Why not face reality and call a spade a spade. Why are you here ? Is it to
try to convince people there is free energy from certain devices without
providing any proof or even evidence ? Or is it to display your poetry ?
I don't read peoms on alternative energy forums. If I want poetry I can
write my own.

I'm less likely to post if people do not type my name or refer to me.

..

[Turion]

Farmhand,

If you will look at my post again you will notice it begins:

QEG,
When I posted my little poem, I guess I should have been more specific. In post 452 you made the statement:

"Over-Unity is a very cruel joke."

I began my post:

"QEG,"

I guess I should have begun it:

"Dear QEG"

so it would have been more clear, but I DID reference a statement the individual who calls himself "QEG" made in post #452. I don't believe you made post 452.

As to why I am here. I guess to annoy you. LOL. Actually to learn and to share. I really don't care whether anybody believes in COP>1 devices. If they choose not to, I have no problem leaving them to their own devices and going cheerfully on my way. Unless of course they accuse me of being a liar, a fraud, or incapable of reading my scope. With that I take issue. And as I have seen COP>1 many times, I guess I am here to encourage others to keep looking. The proof is in the numbers.

Dave

[BroMikey]

Toroidal Motor

That's just a two phase generator with a very poor makeshift rotor, I did it just
to show the two voltage phases 90 degrees difference with the rotor magnet
placing I used, nothing special, nothing to do with Witts at all, it is a toroid
wound similarly to Tesla's two phase generator and rotor with permanent
magnets rather than a wound rotor. It has no real working purpose except to
show the winding connections and configuration to get two phases from the
four separate coils wound on each quarter with opposite coils series connected.

Tesla patent on AC generator plant. The text stamped on the patent and
showing in the link should read "Best Available Copy" not
"Best available Cop" the "Y" didn;t come out in the stamping process.
Patent US390721 - Best available cop - Google Patents




Witts are scammers as is FTW and the QEG a scam.
..

Dog Blast that is a nice size machine dude. Seems like you are not very far away from some kind of reconnection diagram to get it doing something else.

WHo knows maybe we will all get enough time to try all these experiments before the bell rings.

I saw your other video and thought wonder what you got from the double coils well 4 coils video???

That reminded me of the old radio days back in the 50's and 60's.

But that core of that round motor should be tested more. Is that big dog all steel? Or ferrite? If it is steel there isnt as much as you can do with it.

But who knows Bedini uses steel rods in his magneto magnet motor.

That's what I call the SSG now.

Anyway I need to say that I am sorry for being so hard on you before and won't hit so hard next time so keep working on something. I know how people feel when they have been around a long time with no free energy.

You will be among some of the first to witness ground breaking results. Can you get time to do what Web000x is doing?

Not that we know the next step. You can run a scope better than me thats for sure but scopes are not everything.

Got any decent cores?

Mikey

[Berg]

Analysis of the WITTS Generator (ver 1.0.7.D) PDF

Version 1.0.7.D

Released on February 14, 2014

Download Your Free Copy

It made for a very interesting read. Thanks to VIDBID!

Berg

[jtanguay]

Well it's about time these plans go mainstream.

Would it be foolish to believe that the plans released have been modified ever so slightly to ensure that the device can never output more than is input?

Looking at Tesla's patent, perhaps this device should first be constructed with a commutator system, tuned, and then analyzed using an oscilloscope. After that a computer controlled system could take over once everyone knows what's happening.

I still believe that the QEG is very similar to the Lockridge device in the way it harnesses power. Keep it simple.

[jtanguay]

FluxSwitch.jpg

Looking at the solid state version, it's probably the better choice of units to try and replicate. The idea appears to be the same. Just change the flux in the core at resonance, and do the best to capture the electricity that comes off it.

Expensive circuitry isn't even a requirement for this one. But an elaborate mechanical switching device is if you go that route. With the advent of cheap electronics these days, it's probably best to go solid state, but to spread this technology to the masses, a mechanical means in which any man could construct would be ideal.

It would be quite interesting to construct a solid state version of the QEG using the solid state coil switching the flux within the core. I bet the circular shape would help increase the efficiency of the coil.

flux-switch-dual-toroid.jpg

I did that up pretty quick for visual reference just to give an idea of how to increase the efficiency of the flux travel and probably boost the output. I forgot to add the magnet in the middle but you get the point.

[gyula]

.... Just change the flux in the core at resonance, and do the best to capture the electricity that comes off it.

....

.

Hi,

Do you mean mechanical resonance of the core? if yes, how do you look for it I wonder.

If you have an inclination to solid state flux switching, I'd like to show you a patent application from 2009: US 20090096219 which does just that but (I believe) in an even more advanced way you show in your last drawing. here is a link:
https://www.google.com/webhp?tbm=pts...US+20090096219

And interestingly enough, the same principle is used for a switching mode power supply circuit by the same inventors, their application is US 2014091890, the link is:
https://www.google.com/webhp?tbm=pts...S+2014091890++

Gyula

[jtanguay]

Baahahahaahahaha!!!

gyula you just made my day/night.

Just goes to show how pointless it is to patent things.

Everything out there is already waiting to be discovered.


My idea for a mechanical oscillator would require a variable capacitor, or some measuring tools to get the inductance of the coils and make sure it all works together.

If you can envision a mechanical switch such a commutator, variable of course so that the timing can be adjusted. A set of 4 would be necessary to control both sets of blocking coils. A motor powered by sharp pulses such as that of a bedini could be used to rotate the switching device to conserve power.

Or... buy one of those cheaper microcontrollers. If you know which frequency is the best for resonance, it will help immensely as it can be calculated by measuring the length of wire (and thickness) of your coils (to give impedance and capacitance)

[interdesign21]

hello all
the fig 18 in the witts pdf, about a 90 degrees shift, drove me to the following (mini) generator with two AC outputs 90 degrees shifted.
May it be useful to anyone as a substitute of a mechanical switch. ( my first thought was for the Figuera setup)

image attached
cheers
Alvaro

[jtanguay]

hello all
the fig 18 in the witts pdf, about a 90 degrees shift, drove me to the following (mini) generator with two AC outputs 90 degrees shifted.
May it be useful to anyone as a substitute of a mechanical switch. ( my first thought was for the Figuera setup)

image attached
cheers
Alvaro

That's an excellent example of a rotor driven 'switch'

There's a good reason that thrapp character mentions 'flux' all the time... Pretty much all their devices appear to make use of flux switching, which makes so much sense.

In my mind, I see it as a 'sea' of energy in balance. There's a way of mechanically trying to force this sea of energy in order to do something, but why not rather direct the flow using some sort of diverter 'valve'?

I wonder if it's possible to make a solid state flux path device that changes it's own flux, utilizing capacitors in order to change the frequency of the flux diversion... To get it started all one would need to do is give it a 'bump' and have it hooked up to some load. Hmmm... maybe that's how that TPU device works? Mark did say that the device relies on a bunch of little 'kicks' that, when combined, can be used to do real work.

Ah if I only had the time/money. Sucks being a slave

[Jack2200]

WITTS a scam? No way Farmhand ! Many independent engineers have verified their stuff. Watch their weekly program on wednesday evening
https://new.livestream.com/WorldImprovement
and learn.
Archive of their older programs:
WorldImprovement on Vimeo

[Iamnuts]

Oh Jack, you're so naive,
I think an old farmhand has a pretty good idea what's going on.
The Witts machine certainly works, it rakes in cash for old Thrapp.
Give Thrapp some of your money, then some more and possibly more
after that.
You'll end up spending thousands and be left with a pile of junk!
John.

[vidbid]

Robert L Zimmerman



https://www.google.com/patents/US2816240

It looks like Zimmerman first came up with this idea.

Regards,

VIDBID

[vidbid]

Just an idea.

Regards,

VIDBID