Planet Earth Free Energy, from Faraday 1831 to date.

[TheoriaApophasis]

INTRODUCTION, PART 1
Faraday primary experiments were done with Permanent Magnets...and not Electromagnets...why?

A Permanent Magnet has its own "Independent and Self Generating Field"...that do not require any external input nor spending of energy.

)

Utterly true, the dielectric inertial plane, concentrated AT , focused AT, (NOT located at) the midpoint of any perm. magnet.



inter-atomic dielectric coherency with resultant point non-specific self-similarity thru the entire perm "magnet".

[TheoriaApophasis]

Ufopolitics

something NOT studied (yet) is that the magnetomotive force in a perm "magnet" is wholly diff. than that of an electro maggie.




The empirical quantification of the MMF between the two can be empirically the same, but are in fact WHOLLY DIFFERENT.


In an electro maggie, magnetic divergence is presented from an already transverse hybrid of electricity which is itself ALREADY unquestionably Phi and Psi (mag and dielectric) wherein which we have the distinction of:

Transverse divergence vs. counterspatial atemporal (NON-TRANSVERSE-causative) discharge (as in a PERM. MAGGIE).




It blows my &#(@($ mind that SH*T like this goes unstudied.

[Ufopolitics]

Conclusions from previous Four Posts..

Conclusions,

The main reason from building this Last Four (4) series of posts, is in order for all of you to "see" like I did...how this whole process works, from the Old, Primitive and raw examples of Induction back from the 1800's and still the exact same models up to now...We have not evolved from the same type of Symmetrical Induction...a "Mirror like" Action-Reaction, encountered in a "Front End Collision" through straight Vectors colliding into each others...now, do you really believe this was and still is... the only way out, in order to achieve same or even better results without facing opposite vectors?

Magnetic Transfer or Re-Direction of Poles from Exciter to Induced Cores, does NOT NECESSARILY require straight vectors, that MUST BE performed in straight lines...they accept angular excitement, since -thanks God and Nature- Magnetic Fields propagate in a Three Dimensional World...not in a straight, flat or tube plane...

Magnetic Fields contain Opposite Vortexes, counter-rotating, like we have seen Theoria Apophasis demonstrate to all of Us...then why we must use RIGID, straight lines, in the main action-reaction exchanges of energy that all this machines utilize?...None of them COMPLY with the way Magnetic Fields revolves and manifests into Space...

The main conflict I see by using this type of principle like above...is that the Energy we are spending to excite, stir the Aether Energy through a Vortex...is being forced to encounter the even stronger forces generated in every single turn...Imagine a Vortex, enclosed like Turbines housings, having at each end of its "tails" or exhaust pipes, distributed through the whole 360º...and spinning clockwise...that is our spent energy...then the energy we try to collect is generated through the same exact type of Turbine...but spinning counterclockwise...and each exhaust tail pipes end is literally CONNECTED, FACE TO FACE with our Vortex of Energy output...what happens?

We only collect the "dripping/left over" energy from the result of this HUGE and constant collisions between this two Vortexes...

At the same time...I would be "recalling" this Four Posts, as a reference to my New coming Thread...where I will show you all a new type of Machine that would avoid this type of colliding forces...am still testing prototypes, but all the schematics and 3d Models are almost done.

It may establish a difference...i do not know yet...but at least, it will show there are "OTHER WAYS" to achieve Induction, not based on the same old models we had for over 130 years.


Regards to All


Ufopolitics