Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Planet Earth Free Energy, from Faraday 1831 to date.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Planet Earth Free Energy, from Faraday 1831 to date.

    INTRODUCTION, PART 1

    Hello to All,

    I have been doing extensive research on this Topic for a while now...it was a recent message dropped at my You Tube Chanel by a Member here...Vidbid...that "reactivated" my desires to conclude all this search and development. And I will need all your help in proving all this Material is completely real.

    Hi, ufopolitics. I hope you're doing well. You know, you can build a generator that produces electricity with no relative motion between the rotor and the magnet. It's true, but instead of using a coil, you use a disk, and get this: the magnet is connected to the disc, and both are rotated, and a current is generated. No relative motion is needed. Check out Bruce De Palma's N-machine and how it works. Good luck.
    I consider it is a fascinating phenomena that We have left behind due to the Higher Development of the Two Piece (Rotor-Stator) Generator Machines...but let's go back in time to 1831...to Faraday's Experimental Lab:

    By the year 1831... chemical reactions were obtaining electricity, the Leyden Jar Batteries were invented...and based on those generated currents, many were creating electromagnets or artificially generated magnetic fields based on coils ( Hans Christian Ørsted in 1820 discovered a deflection on his compass needle when conductors carrying currents from batteries were approached, then André-Marie Ampère in 1825 invented the Solenoid or Coil) ...Faraday wanted to "reverse" this process...He knew if electricity could create a magnetic field...then the inverse process could be possible...obtaining electricity from a Magnetic Field.

    Faraday primary experiments were done with Permanent Magnets...and not Electromagnets...why?

    A Permanent Magnet has its own "Independent and Self Generating Field"...that do not require any external input nor spending of energy...therefore, besides experiments having a simple approach, the "proof of concept" would be radical.

    Faraday conducted many experiments , all reported to the Royal Society Institution of London, Faraday built the hand rotating Homopolar Generator...and basically Three combinations/probabilities were tested:

    1-Static Magnets/Rotating Disc.

    2-Stationary Disc/Rotating Magnets

    3-All (Disc and Magnets) rotating

    Out of this Three, the Second was disregarded as no deflection on the needle of his Galvanometer was obtained...But, First and Third Tests were successful. The Primary one lead to using a single conductor of copper...that later derived in the actual Two Piece Generator complex Coils arrangement Machines that we all have up to now.

    However, the Third arrangement, even though caused exactly same needle deflection...was not fully developed like the First one did over the coming Centuries...

    Faraday was actually more impressed by the last test (3)...than by the primary one, leading him to build further Geometries and experiments besides the Disc and the Horseshoe Magnet we all know...

    EARTH-INDUCTORS...

    [IMG][/IMG]

    In one,* a Hat ring of twelve inches' external diameter, and one inch broad, was cut from a thick copper plate, and mounted to revolve between the poles of the magnet, two conductors being applied to make rubbing contact at the inner and outer edge at the part which passed between the magnetic poles.
    In another,t a disc of copper, one-fifth of an inch thick and only Ii inch in diameter (Fig. 7), was amalgamated at the edge, and mounted on a copper axle. A square piece of sheet metal had a circular hole cut in it, into which the disc fitted loosely; a little mercury completed communication between the disc and its surrounding ring. The latter was connected by wire to a galvanometer; the other wire being connected from the instrument to the end of the axle. Upon rotating the disc in a horizontal plane, currents were obtained, though the earth was the only magnet employed.
    [IMG][/IMG]

    In another apparatus, * a copper cylinder (Fig. 8), closed at one extremity, was put over a magnet, one half of which it enclosed like a cap, and to which it
    was attached without making metallic contact. The arrangement was then floated upright in a narrow jar of mercury, so that the lower edge of the copper cap touched the fluid. On rotating the magnet and its attached cap, a current was sent through wires from the mercury to the top of the copper cap. In another apparatus, still preserved at the Royal Institution, a cylindrical bar magnet, half immersed in mercury, was made to rotate, and generated a current, its own metal serving as a conductor.

    In another form, the cylindrical magnet was rotated horizontally about its own axis, and was found to generate currents which flowed from the middle to the ends, or vice versa, according to the rotation.
    [IMG][/IMG]

    In yet another machine (Fig. 9), constructed by Faraday some time later,* a simple rectangle of copper wire w, attached to a frame, was rotated about a
    horizontal axis placed east and west, and generated alternate currents, which could be collected by a simple commutator c.
    The description of these new electrical machines is concluded by Faraday with the following pregnant words :-

    I have rather, however, been desirous of discovering new facts and relations dependent on magneto-electric induction, than of exalting the force of those already obtained ; being assured that. the latter would find their full development hereafter.

    All Reference above :Michael Faraday, his life and work (1898)
    Faraday and the Ether (Intervening Medium)

    The mathematicians, Laplace and Poisson at their head, had seized on this demonstration and had elaborated their mathematical theories.
    Before them, though the research. lay for a century unpublished, Cavendish had shown that the only law of force as between one element of an electric charge and another compatible with a charge being in equilibrium was the law of inverse squares. But in all these mathematical reasonings one thing had been quite left out of sight-namely, the possible properties of the intervening medium.
    Faraday, to whom the idea of mere action at a distance was abhorrent, if not unthinkable, conceived of all these forces of attraction and repulsion as effects taking place by something going on in the intervening medium.
    FARADAY PAPERS TO ROYAL SOCIETY: TERRESTRIAL MAGNETO ELECTRIC INDUCTION (1832)

    He sent to the Royal Society an account of these and the earlier experiments; his paper on terrestrial magneto-electric induction, and on the force and direction of magneto-electric induction, received the distinction of being read as the Bakerian lecture of the year.

    The following summary of this second paper is from the pen of Professor Tyndall :-

    He (Faraday) placed a bar of iron in a coil of wire, and lifting the
    bar into the direction of the dipping needle, he excited by this
    action a current in the coil. On reversing the bar, a current
    in the opposite direction rushed through the wire. The same
    effect was produced, when, on holding the helix in the line of
    dip, a bar of iron was thrust into it. Here, however, the earth
    acted on the coil through the intermediation of the bar of iron.


    He abandoned the bar, and simply set a copper plate spinning
    in a horizontal plane; he knew that the earth's lines of
    magnetic force then crossed the plate at an angle of about 70º.
    When the plate spun round, the lines of force were intersected
    and induced currents generated
    , which produced their proper
    affect when carried from the plate to the galvanometer .
    .. When the plate was in the magnetic meridian, or in any
    other plane coinciding with the magnetic dip, then its rotation
    produced no effect upon the galvanometer."
    At the suggestion of a mind fruitful in suggestions of a profound and philosophic character-I mean that of Sir John Herschel-Mr. Barlow, of Woolwich, had experimented with a
    rotating iron shell Mr. Christie had also performed an elaborate series of experiments on a rotating iron disc. Both of them had found that when in rotation the body exercised a
    peculiar action upon the magnetic needle, deflecting it in a manner which was not observed during quiescence; but neither of them was aware at the time of the agent which
    produced this extraordinary deflection. They ascribed it to some change in the magnetism of the iron shell and disc.

    But Faraday at once saw that his induced currents must come into play here, and he immediately obtained them from an iron disc. With a hollow brass ball, moreover, he produced the effects obtained by Mr. Barlow. Iron was in no way necessary; the only condition of success was that the rotating body should be of a character to admit of the formation of currents in its substance; it must, in other words, be a conductor of electricity. The higher the conducting power, the more copious were the currents.

    He now passes from his little brass globe to the globe of the earth. He plays like a magician with the earth's magnetism. He sees the invisible lines along which its magnetic action is exerted, and, sweeping his wand across these lines, he evokes this new power. Placing a simple loop of wire round a magnetic needle, he bends its upper portion to the west; the north pole of the needle immediately swerves to the east; he bends his loop to the east, and the north pole moves to the west. Suspending a common bar magnet in a vertical position, he causes it to spin round its own axis. Its pole being connected with one end of a galvanometer wire, and its equator with the other end; electricity rushes round the galvanometer from the rotating magnet.

    He remarks upon the "singular independence" of the magnetism and the body of the magnet which carries it.

    The steel behaves as if it were isolated from its own magnetism. And then his thoughts suddenly widen, and he asks himself whether the rotating earth does not generate induced currents as it turns round its axis from west to east...
    This Studies and Experiments from Faraday related to Earth Magnetic Field and Induction continued through the following years, it is impossible to upload everything into this Post...but I encourage you to read the Literature I link at the end of all this Material.

    I have tried to set this paper as brief and extracted as possible without missing the important/relevant aspects We all need to know, in order to elaborate further developments and new type of machines...
    Last edited by Ufopolitics; 02-23-2014, 09:19 PM.
    Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

  • #2
    Part 2

    PART 2

    MAGNETIC FIELD SPATIAL DENSITY

    The phenomenon of direct extraction of electrical energy from space has a simple explanation based on a re-interpretation of magnetism. Heretofore, it has been believed that the magnetic field comes from the magnet. The phenomenon of the magnetic field can also be explained by positing a primordial energy field, which, in the first order is uniform and homogeneus. The highly anisotropic condition of the material of the magnet, if it be the permanent variety, or the condition created by the passage of electric current through a solenoid, causes a distortion of the isotropic spatial field which we know as magnetism. Passing a conducting wire through the spatial distortion adjacent to the pole of a magnet elicits the electric potential across the ends of the wire.

    Field magnets in electric generators do not run down nor does more electrical excitation need to be applied no matter how much energy is being drawn from the machine. This is because the generated electrical energy is being drawn from the spatial distortion created by the field magnets.

    The drag and energy penalty of the conventional two piece induction electrical generator arises from the incomplete understanding of magnetism and the nature of the magnetic field. If we accept the notion that all electricity generation arises from distortion of a primordial energy field than we could look to methods of creating the appropiate distortion and concomitant energy generation without invoking Lenz's Law.

    Bruce De Palma

    When Faraday originally discover in 1831, that "just one" conductor passing in front of a static magnetic field will deflect the needle of his Galvanometer...all the further development , based on this simple experiment, opened up in future years... the design of very complex windings...up to now.

    However, the Discovery that in Faraday caused more surprise...the magnet and copper disc rotating together...and even a lonely magnet with copper "cap" cylinder...or even a Cylinder Magnet by itself...will still produce SAME degree of deflection on Galvanometer as the rotary disc/static magnets does..However, this late discovery did not go through same development of more clever machines...¿ ?

    The different opinions from many experimenters/scientists...debating WHY magnet by itself would produce electricity...derived into many speculations...but basically two.

    1- Are the Magnetic Field Lines rotating with Magnet embodiment?

    2-Or...are they Static?

    (Another "possibility" came to play into the "Dilemma"...The Conducting wires and Galvanometer itself, could be serving as to cut the lines of the moving field, therefore being the ones to generate electrical flow...but we will not even stop/talk -as of now- about that ridiculous theory...since with only a few different ways/turns to rigidly expand wires away from rotating model...will exempt them from being inside the lines of force in a Perpendicular way.)

    Faraday, as soon as he observed this phenomena (magnet rotating and producing electrical flow)...came to the conclusion that the Metal from Magnet was cutting the lines of its own Magnetic Field.

    To me this is the perfect and right conclusion...now, whether magnetic field is Static or Moving with Magnet Body...I have read so many books related to further experiments...done since the late 1800's, and I have NOT found, just one conclusion/statement from so many brilliant scientists working on this... that considers a different approach between Moving or Static Theories:

    Why none of them thought of an "in-between" the Two Theories approach?

    Magnetic Field "Spatial" Density being higher than the "Physical" Body of Magnet?

    When We rotate a Physical Body through a fixed/shaft attached to a Motor or other Prime Mover...we obtain Immediate Response...and as Motor reaches "X" RPM's...our rotating body would reach EXACTLY SAME RPM's...BUT...What about a Dense Field "lingering in Space" not DIRECTLY -PHYSICALLY- ATTACHED to that Rotating Body?

    To me...Magnetic Field "stays behind" (relative to physical rotation) at certain HIGH RPM's parameter, where the differential of acceleration reaches A value...then Metal from Magnet starts cutting its own Magnetic Field lines of force...Electricity is then generated.

    Putting it in Math simple Equations:

    V1=Speed of Physical Magnetic Body
    V2=Speed of Spatial Magnetic Field

    Therefore, when We have:

    V1=V2 No Electricity is Generated.

    But, when:

    V1>V2...Electricity is generated

    And of course it all depends upon magnetic field density specifications, magnetic field physical geometries and properties, etc.
    As We all know that not all materials generate same spatial magnetic field attributes/spec's...like strength, amplitude into space or...density.

    Imagine we find a very light weight Matter or Material based Magnet...but with a very Dense/Strong Coefficient of Spatial Magnetic Field...

    Then We all will have an "Ideal Scenario" if:

    V1<V2

    This would mean that by rotating a super light weight magnetic body at very low RPM's...huge amounts of Electrical Power would be generated instantly.
    Last edited by Ufopolitics; 02-23-2014, 09:11 PM.
    Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

    Comment


    • #3
      Part 3

      PART 3

      CONTEMPORARY SCIENCE/MODERN PHYSICS

      VAN ALLEN RADIATION BELT

      [IMG][/IMG]

      A Van Allen radiation belt is one of at least two layers of energetic charged particles (plasma) that is held in place around the planet Earth by the planet's magnetic field. The belts extend from an altitude of about 1,000 to 60,000 kilometers above the surface in which region radiation levels vary. Most of the particles that form the belts are thought to come from solar wind and other particles by cosmic rays.[1] The belts are named after their discoverer, James Van Allen, and are located in the inner region of the Earth's magnetosphere. The belts contain energetic electrons that form the outer belt and a combination of protons and electrons that form the inner belt. The radiation belts additionally contain lesser amounts of other nuclei, such as alpha particles. The belts endanger satellites, which must protect their sensitive components with adequate shielding if their orbit spends significant time in the radiation belts. In 2013, NASA reported that the Van Allen Probes had discovered a transient, third radiation belt, which was observed for four weeks until destroyed by a powerful, interplanetary shock wave from the Sun.

      Inner Belt

      While protons form one radiation belt, trapped electrons present two distinct structures, the inner and outer belt. The inner electron Van Allen Belt extends typically from an altitude of 0.2 to 2 Earth radii (L values of 1 to 3) or 600 miles (1,000 km) to 3,700 miles (6,000 km) above the Earth.[1][12] In certain cases when solar activity is stronger or in geographical areas such as the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA), the inner boundary may go down to roughly 200 kilometers[13] above the Earth's surface. The inner belt contains high concentrations of electrons in the range of hundreds of keV and energetic protons with energies exceeding 100 MeV, trapped by the strong (relative to the outer belts) magnetic fields in the region. [14]

      It is believed that proton energies exceeding 50 MeV in the lower belts at lower altitudes are the result of the beta decay of neutrons created by cosmic ray collisions with nuclei of the upper atmosphere. The source of lower energy protons is believed to be proton diffusion due to changes in the magnetic field during geomagnetic storms.[15]

      Due to the slight offset of the belts from Earth's geometric center, the inner Van Allen belt makes its closest approach to the surface at the South Atlantic Anomaly

      From:Van Allen radiation belt - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


      CORIOLIS EFFECT


      THE SAA (South Atlantic Anomaly)
      Last edited by Ufopolitics; 02-28-2014, 07:24 AM.
      Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

      Comment


      • #4
        Earth Equator Line

        Part 4

        Earth Equator Line And Commercial Flights...

        [IMG][/IMG]

        Watch video below:

        airtraffic - YouTube

        Now, please note that there are absolutely NO International Flights (Continent to Continent) flying (following) through Equator Line...or even the Tropics of Cancer or Capricorn...even though it is the shortest distance?

        Then read all "Hypothesis" that Aviators are taught by "Officials/Authorities" as "possible causes"...that generates Turbulence and electrical-electromagnetic malfunctions of on board sensitive equipment... when flying over the Equator Line

        The ITCZ (Inter Tropical Convergence Zone)

        Or even for "Clear Blue Skies"...The CAT (Clear Air Turbulence)

        AIRLINERS/AVIATION/FORUMS

        Turbulence Over The Equator — Civil Aviation Forum | Airliners.net

        This Guy offers a pretty good and different theory...Circumference of Planet Earth around Equator...versus Northern or Southern circumference...versus Earth Rotating Speed.

        Now here is where this discussion gets tricky. The circumference of the earth at the equator is 25,000 miles. But the circumference of the earth north or south of the equator is less. If you measured the circumference of the earth at the latitude of New York or San Francisco you would find the circumference is about 19,000 miles.

        This means a place on the equator - such as Guayaquil, Ecuador or Belem, Brazil - rotates 25,000 miles a day. New York or San Francisco rotate 19,000 miles a day. Now, how many miles per hour is that. Already you realize there equator is moving at about a thousand miles per hour. Why? Because, if you divide 25,000 miles by 24 hours, you find out point at the equator is moving at a linear speed of a little over 1000 miles per hour. (The SOAR Library » Turbulence, High Places and Propriocepion)
        Here is a similar version related to the "Great Circle" (The Equator)

        Air Travel: Why don't airplanes typically fly by equator? - Quora


        Now, the fact is that Planes DO CRASH when trying to fly on Equator line...for a steady long period of time.

        (CNN) -- There is a region of the world where the weather is always hot and humid and it rains almost every day of the year. Sounds predictable, right? But weather in the Intertropical Convergence Zone, or ITCZ, can be volatile and dangerous.
        Air France Flight 447 went down in a volatile zone along the equator between South America and Africa.

        [IMG][/IMG]

        Air France Flight 447 went down in a volatile zone along the equator between South America and Africa.

        The Intertropical Convergence Zone, which circles the Earth near the equator, is where officials say Air France Flight 447 plunged into the Atlantic Ocean. While weather has not been cited as a reason for the plane's crash, the tragedy does call attention to the region.

        The ITCZ is a belt of low pressure that wraps around the planet. Clouds and storms form along it because it is literally where the winds of the world's hemispheres meet.

        High pressure in the Northern Hemisphere churns air from the northeast toward the equator. On the flip side, air is steered from the southeast by high pressure in the Southern Hemisphere. The winds that move this air toward the equator are also known as "trade winds" and converge in the middle of the tropics. That's where the Intertropical Convergence Zone name comes from.

        Here, air and water temperatures are typically in the mid-80s. The warm, moist air is heated further by the blazing tropical sun. Steamy air, coming off the ocean, rises until it hits cooler, drier air aloft, forming clouds and thunderstorms. These gigantic storms contain volatile updrafts and downdrafts that can move at speeds of 100 mph.

        (Airplane went down in volatile equatorial zone - CNN.com
        I have not been able to find ANY, Hypothesis or even a single Theory...that blames this Phenomena to Earth Magnetism...Earth as a Giant Magnet...where Equator Line would be where the concentration of Lines of Force are at its greatest strength and uniformity/alignment...or other words...Faraday 1831...... and the fact that a Commercial/International Airplane body is made of Aluminum...a Paramagnetic Material...and when traveling Equator Line would be "Inducing" High Electrical Currents on its metal structure, by "cutting" perpendicularly this lines of force...causing all kind of malfunctions on sensitive electronics and controls...as a heck of a Turbulent ride on top of the field waves...


        Regards


        Ufopolitics
        Last edited by Ufopolitics; 02-28-2014, 07:32 AM.
        Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

        Comment


        • #5
          Conclusions And Literature

          Conclusions And Literature 1
          Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

          Comment


          • #6
            Conclusions 2

            Conclusions Part 2
            Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

            Comment


            • #7
              Brief Explanation of all this crazy Thread...

              Hello to All,

              Please do not think I have become completely "Mentally Insane"(even though I know many here are positive that I am... )

              It is just sooo much material that One single Post-Thread is not enough to even fill the first part of this...so I "reserved" spaces with Material to be uploaded...in order to keep a solid continuation of the whole Initial Thread.

              Thanks for your attention and patience...while I Edit and Fill empty spaces...


              Ufopolitics
              Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

              Comment


              • #8
                I should have read the last post, now I can't delete, my last post, and yes, we all know your crazy, buts that's ok.
                Oops, I guess I did delete it, oh well, your still crazy.

                Comment


                • #9
                  The aether or whatever

                  I'd like to know how a rotor of magnets surrounded by stator coils can feed capacitors , that aren't even connected?
                  They're in close proximity ,but not connected?
                  Also it only happens at certain rpm. And only when shorting the coils , or perhaps releasing the short?
                  Looking forward to more of the old stuff....crazy might not be so bad.
                  artv

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Hi Ufopolitics,

                    Awesome thread.

                    Michael Faraday is the Man!

                    also, Bruce DePalma!

                    Regards,

                    Vidbid
                    Regards,

                    VIDBID

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I am very happy to see this thread, especially since it is you Ufo, sharing your ideas. Fascinating stuff.
                      Looking forward to reading all you and everyone have to say on this subject.

                      Regards
                      Last edited by Cadman; 02-28-2014, 02:05 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Here is a picture of an earth device that could have been used by ancients:

                        It had great importance. the device has three orbital rings stacked vertical from small to large at the top a hemisphere.
                        The shape indicates conical implication therefore hyperbolic geometry the sphere could be for adjustment
                        which leads me to speculate the device used resonance and sound.
                        This does not leave much to work with a question remains regarding
                        the other devices whether there is anything supporting speculation this was as tuning fork sort of vibration category.
                        Is there anything that might suggest that when it was used it had any magnitude ? gloves or safety glasses or anything else.
                        Is it the remains from a crashed saucer or is there something to suggest it was working and an earth devise. Stone cutter whatever.
                        It is like a forensic puzzle. The reason I posted this here is like ancients that the actual purpose is not always clear,
                        something in the equipment could be overlooked and a discussion is better than only one authors opinion. thank you forum and poster

                        Now on the Faraday diagram for this post

                        Some of the Faraday stuff was also weird, things that are not used for typical physics models but are placed
                        on shelves in museums away from the rest of the artifacts. If anything was published by Faraday during that time
                        on what he was doing it may be helpful in putting those documents on this thread.
                        Attached Files
                        Last edited by mikrovolt; 02-28-2014, 01:39 AM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          @mikrovolt:

                          That represents an early Egyptian/ancient battery (long before Volta took credit for it after Europe's raid on Egyptian culture).

                          Seek more on it with the related 'Ankh' (the early tank circuit) of the times.

                          Resonance to all !

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            The Evolution of Matter...

                            Years ago, I had been told by several people, that the US government frequently removes books they deem dangerous or 'sensitive' from libraries. Some are replaced with sections removed or rewritten so as to 'contain' information that should not be available to the public despite the authors intent. A key example was during the Manhattan Project when the US was trying to finalize research into atomic bombs. They removed any books that dealt with the subject and two of them were by Dr. Gustave Le Bon since they dealt with both energy and matter including radioactivity. (/http://www.keelynet.com/news/122613e.html)

                            Page 88 - Without the ether there could be neither gravity, nor light, nor electricity, nor heat, nor anything, in a word, of which we have knowledge. The universe would be silent and dead, or would reveal itself in a form which we cannot even foresee. If one could construct a glass chamber from which the ether were to be entirely eliminated, heat and light could not pass through it. It would be absolutely dark, and probably gravitation would no longer act on the bodies within it. They would then have lost their weight.


                            Page 96-97 - A material vortex may be formed by any fluid, liquid or gaseous, turning round an axis, and by the fact of its rotation it describes spirals. The study of these vortices has been the object of important researches by different scholars, notably by Bjerkness and Weyher. They have shown that by them can be produced all the attractions and repulsions recognized in electricity, the deviations of the magnetic needle by currents, etc. These vortices are produced by the rapid rotation of a central rod furnished with pallets, or, more simply, of a sphere. Round this sphere gaseous currents are established, dissymetrical with regard to its equatorial plane, and the result is the attraction or repulsion of bodies brought near to it, according to the position given to them. It is even possible, as Weyher has proved, to compel these bodies to turn round the sphere as do the satellites of a planet without touching it.


                            The Evolution of Matter/ DR Gustave Le Bon

                            I highly recommend this Free E-Book: The Evolution of Matter...It will greatly help Us to "Digest" many aspects, many laws...and many phenomena that Classic Physics can not...or have not taught Us...


                            Regards


                            Ufopolitics
                            Principles for the Development of a Complete Mind: Study the science of art. Study the art of science. Develop your senses- especially learn how to see. Realize that everything connects to everything else.― Leonardo da Vinci

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
                              Page 88 - Without the ether ...
                              And the word and meaning of "ether" (also spelled "aether") is related to the word "eternity" (Latin "aeternitas")

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X